Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in adolescents / Confiabilidade e validade da versão brasileira do Índice de Qualidade do Sono de Pittsburgh em adolescentes

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Methods: 309 adolescents, subdivided into a sample of 209 subjects, of whom 25 were reassessed, and another sample of 100 adolescents. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α-values, intraclass correlation coefficient, Standard Error of Measure, Minimum Detectable Change, and Bland-Altman plotting. Exploratory analysis of the questionnaire components was performed based on the sample of 209 adolescents. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed with a sample of 100 individuals. Results: The sample of 209 participants had a mean age of 14.38 (±1.94) years, comprising 80 (38.3%) girls and 129 (61.7%) boys. The sample of 100 adolescents had a mean age of 13.66 (±2.35) years, comprising 51 (51%) girls and 49 (49%) boys. The questionnaire obtained a Standard Error of Measure = 1.12 and Minimum Detectable Change = 3.10. Cronbach's α was 0.71 and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.21-0.85). The factor analysis showed that the best model of components was the one that consisted of two factors, excluding the component on the use of sleep medications. Conclusion: The questionnaire showed high internal consistency and moderate reliability. Furthermore, a model with two factors seems to be the most appropriate to evaluate the quality of sleep in adolescents.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a confiabilidade e validade da versão brasileira do Índice de Qualidade do Sono de Pittsburgh. Métodos: Uma amostra de 309 adolescentes, subdivididos em uma de 209 indivíduos, dos quais 25 foram reavaliados, e outra de 100 adolescentes. A confiabilidade foi avaliada por meio dos valores de α de Cronbach, coeficiente de correlação intraclasse, erro padrão da medida, mínima mudança detectável e plotado gráfico Bland-Altman. A análise exploratória dos componentes do questionário foi feita com base na amostra de 209 adolescentes. A análise fatorial confirmatória foi feita com a amostra de 100 indivíduos. Resultados: A amostra de 209 participantes teve uma média de 14,38 (± 1,94) anos, 80 (38,3%) meninas e 129 (61,7%) meninos. A amostra composta por 100 adolescentes teve uma média de 13,66 (± 2,35) anos, 51 (51%) meninas e 49 (49%) meninos. O questionário obteve erro padrão da medida = 1,12 e mudança mínima detectável = 3,10. O α de Cronbach foi de 0,71 e coeficiente de correlação intraclasse de 0,65 (IC95% 0,21-0,85). As análises fatoriais apontaram como melhor modelo de componentes aquele composto por dois fatores, com exclusão do componente sobre uso de medicamentos para dormir. Conclusão: O questionário obteve elevada consistência interna e confiabilidade moderada. Além disso, um modelo de dois fatores parece ser o mais adequado para avaliar a qualidade do sono em adolescentes.

Low and high-frequency TENS in post-episiotomy pain relief: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of low-frequency TENS (LFT) and high-frequency TENS (HFT) in post-episiotomy pain relief. Method: A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with placebo composed of 33 puerperae with post-episiotomy pain. TENS was applied for 30 minutes to groups: HFT(100 Hz; 100 µs), LFT (5 Hz; 100 µs), and placebo (PT). Four electrodes were placed in parallel near the episiotomy and four pain evaluations were performed with the numeric rating scale. The first and the second evaluation took place before TENS application and immediately after its removal and were done in the resting position and in the activities of sitting and ambulating. The third and fourth evaluation took place 30 and 60 minutes after TENS removal, only in the resting position. Intragroup differences were verified using the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, and the intergroup analysis employed the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: In the intragroup analysis, there was no significant difference in the PT during rest, sitting, and ambulation (P>0.05). In the HFT and LFT, a significant difference was observed in all activities (P<0.001). In the intergroup analysis, there was a significant difference in the resting position in the HFT and LFT (P<0.001). In the sitting activity, a significant difference was verified in the second evaluation in the HFT and LFT (P<0.008). No significant difference was verified among the groups in ambulation (P<0.20). Conclusions: LFT and HFT are an effective resource that may be included in the routine of maternity wards. .