Validez y confiabilidad de los resultados del instrumento MEDUC-PG14 para medir el desempeño docente en la residencia médica en Perú / Performance of the MEDUC-PG14 instrument to evaluate teaching performance in medical residency programs

Background: There are few instruments to evaluate teachers' performance during medical residency in Spanish. Aim: To determine the validity and reliability of the MEDUC-PG14 instrument to evaluate teaching performance in the medical residency programs of the Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH). Material and Methods: An open question about positive aspects that characterize a good teacher was added to the MEDUC-PG14 questionnaire. A pilot test was carried out with 15 residents to assess the correct comprehension of each question and carry out necessary changes. Subsequently, the instrument was sent by email to 366 residents of the UPCH Department of Medical Clinics. The reliability of the instrument was evaluated using Cronbach's Alpha. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis, and the validity of content by a qualitative analysis of the answers to the open question added. Results: Seventy residents answered the questionnaire evaluating 46 teachers. Each resident evaluated one teacher. The factor analysis showed two dimensions explaining 83% of the variance: the dimension "Teaching and Evaluation" (11 items) and the dimension "Respectful Behavior" (three items). The global Cronbach's Alpha was 0.97 (0.97 for the Teaching Dimension 0.96 and for the Behavioral Dimension). The concept of "professional competence as a medical specialist" was rescued from the responses to the open question. Conclusions: The MEDUC-PG14 is an instrument with valid and highly reliable results. It is useful and easy to apply to evaluate teaching performance in postgraduate studies. Its use is recommended in residency programs of Spanish-speaking countries. However, the inclusion of an item referring to the professional competence of the teacher is suggested.

Precisión de la taquipnea y las retracciones subcostales como signos clínicos para diagnóstico de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en niños: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis / Identification of tachypnea and subcostal retractions as clinical signs for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia among children: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objetivos. Evaluar si la taquipnea y las retracciones subcostales son predictoras eficientes para el diagnóstico de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) en niños. Materiales y métodos. Se revisaron las bases de datos: PubMed, LILACS, The African Journal Database y The Cochrane Central Library. Se incluyeron estudios originales que evaluaron el rendimiento diagnóstico de los criterios clínicos de taquipnea o retracciones subcostales, definidos según los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) para el diagnóstico de NAC en niños de hasta cinco años de edad con tos y fiebre. Se estimaron las razones de probabilidades (LR), el odds ratio diagnostico (DOR) y sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95% (IC95%) para cada prueba clínica evaluada. Resultados. Se encontraron 975 estudios, incluyendo ocho en la revisión. Se enrolaron 4740 pacientes y analizaron 3584 (75%), de los cuales 916 (19%) tuvieron el diagnóstico de NAC. Al combinar los datos, la taquipnea obtuvo una LR positiva de 3,16, (IC95% 2,11-4,73) y una LR negativa de 0,36 (IC95% 0,23-0,57). El DOR fue de 10,63 (IC95% 4,4-25,66, I2=93%). Al realizar el análisis para retracciones subcostales se obtuvo un LR positivo de 2,49 (IC95% 1,41-4,37) y un LR negativo de 0,59 (IC95% 0,4-0,87). El DOR fue de 5,32 (IC95% 1,88-15,05, I2=89%). Conclusiones. Se puede tomar en cuenta la presencia o ausencia de taquipnea y retracciones subcostales en el diagnóstico de NAC, cabe considerar la incertidumbre relativa en su poder diagnóstico y los LR relativamente modestos. La confianza en estos resultados es baja por la inadecuada calidad de la evidencia en este tema.

Objectives. Determine whether tachypnea and subcostal retractions can be efficient predictors for the diagnosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) among children. Materials and methods. These were the databases used: PubMed, LILACS, The African Journal Database and The Cochrane Central Library. Original studies were included which assessed the diagnostic performance of the clinical criteria for tachypnea or subcostal retraction defined in accordance with the criteria of the World Health Organization (OMS) for CAP diagnosis in children ≤ 5 with cough and fever. The likelihood ratio (LR), the diagnosis odds ratio (DOR), and their respective confidence intervals at 95% (IC95%) were estimated for each clinical test. Results. 975 studies were found, eight were included in the review. 4740 patients were enrolled and 3584 (75%) were analyzed, 916 (19%) of which had a CAP diagnosis. When data were combined, tachypnea had a positive LR of 3.16, (95% CI 2.11-4.73) and a negative LR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.23-0.57). The DOR was 10.63 (95% CI 4.4-25.66, I2=93%). When subcostal retractions were analyzed, a positive LR of 2.49 (95%CI 1.41-4.37) and a negative LR of 0.59 (95%CI 0.4-0.87) were obtained. The DOR was 5.32 (95%CI 1.88-15.05, I2=89%). Conclusions. The presence or absence of tachypnea and subcostal retractions can be used in CAP diagnosis; it is worth considering the relative uncertainty in its diagnostic power and relatively modest LR. The confidence of these results is low due to the inadequate quality of the related evidence.