RESUMEN
Objective To compare the clinical effects and safety of surgical clipping and intravascular interventional therapy in treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysm.Methods The clinical data of 158 patients with intracranial wide-necked aneurysm from February 2010 to February 2013 were retrospectively analyzed,all patients were divided into two groups:surgical clipping group with 92 cases and intravascular interventional therapy group with 66 cases,the postoperative curative effects,treatment time,hospital stay,hospital expenses and postoperative complications between two groups were compared.Followed up for 10-46 months,the recurrence rate were compared.Results The good prognosis and defective rates between surgical clipping group and intravasular interventional therapy group had no significant difference [90.2％(83/92) vs.90.9％(60/66),9.8％(9/92) vs.9.1％ (6/66)] (x2 =0.298,P ＞ 0.05).The preoperative Hunt-Hess classification and CT Fisher classification between two groups had no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).Six months after discharge,mRS score was used to evaluate the curative effect,the defective rates in same level patients between two kinds of treatment methods had no significantdifference (P ＞ 0.05).The treatment time,hospital stay in surgical clipping group were significantly longer than those in intravascular interventional therapy group [(4.03 ± 1.01) h vs.(1.61 ± 0.98) h,(15.90 ± 2.03) dvs.(13.20 ± 1.95) d],hospital expenses was significantly lower than that in intravascular intervention therapy group [61 829.4 ±320.6) yuan vs.(99 876.2 ±371.5) yuan] (P ＜0.05).The postoperative complications rate between two groups had no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).Followed up for 31.3 (10-46) months,the recurrence rate in surgical clipping group was significantly lower than that in intravascular intervention therapy group [1.1％ (1/94) vs.8.8％ (6/68)] (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Surgical clipping and intravascular interventional therapy in treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysm has their own different characteristics,so patients' treatment methods should be based on their preoperative status (especially preoperative Hunt-Hess and Fisher classification) and patients' economic conditions.
RESUMEN
Objective To discuss the clinical effects of using CT positioning keyhole approach to treat hy-pertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).Methods 85 cases of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemor-rhage(HICH) were chosen and divided into two groups according to the operation methods:the observation group had 55 cases given CT positioning keyhole approach ,while the control group had 30 cases treated with traditional cranioto-my hematoma removal operation .All patients were supplemented by postoperative blood pressure control and nutrition -al support treatment .The average operation time ,hematoma disappearing time ,the length of hospital stay and re-bleed-ing rates and postoperative ability of daily life ( ADL) scores of the two groups were all carefully recorded and com-pared.Results The average operation time,hematoma disappearing time and hospital stay of the observation group were (66.5 ±12.8)min,(3.4 ±1.3)d,and (9.3 ±1.7)day which were all significantly lower than those of the con-trol group(193.5 ±23.7)min,(5.8 ±2.1)d and (15.2 ±3.8)d;T-test values of the two groups were 2.874,3.125 and 3.433 separately(P0.05).6 months′follow-up after opera-tion,in the control group 2 cases were lost to follow-up while in the observation group 3 cases were lost to follow-up;Using ADL to evaluate the two groups of patients with survival and continuous follow-up,we found that the observation group′s postoperative quality of life was better than that of the control group′s(μ=3.325,P<0.05).Conclusion Using CT positioning keyhole approach has smaller trauma , shorter operation time and faster postoperative recovery and other characteristics,which is an effective method for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH).