RESUMEN
Aims: IMPROVE Brady assessed whether a process improvement intervention could increase adoption of guideline-based therapy in sinus node dysfunction (SND) patients. Methods: /Results: IMPROVE Brady was a sequential, prospective, quality improvement initiative conducted in India and Bangladesh. Patients with symptomatic bradycardia were enrolled. In Phase I, physicians assessed and treated patients per standard care. Phase II began after implementing educational materials for physicians and patients. Primary objectives were to evaluate the impact of the intervention on SND diagnosis and pacemaker (PPM) implant. SF-12 quality of life (QoL) and Zarit burden surveys were collected pre- and post-PPM implant. A total of 978 patients were enrolled (57.7 ± 14.8 years, 75% male), 508 in Phase I and 470 in Phase II. The diagnosis of SND and implantation of PPM increased significantly from Phase I to Phase II (72% vs. 87%, P < 0.001 and 17% vs. 32%, P < 0.001, respectively). Pacemaker implantation was not feasible in 41% of patients due to insurance/cost barriers which was unaltered by the intervention. Both patient QoL and caregiver burden improved at 6-months post-PPM implant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A process improvement initiative conducted at centers across India and Bangladesh significantly increased the diagnosis of SND and subsequent treatment with PPM therapy despite the socio-economic constraints.
RESUMEN
Aims: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a devastating complication amongst survivors of myocardial infarction (MI). Mortality is high in the initial months after MI. The aims of the INSPIRE-ELR study were to assess the proportion of patients with significant arrhythmias early after MI and the association with mortality during 12 months of follow-up. Methods: The study included 249 patients within 14 days after MI with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) _x0001_35% at discharge in 11 hospitals in India. Patients received a wearable external loop recorder (ELR) 5 ± 3 days after MI to monitor arrhythmias for 7 days. Results: Patients were predominantly male (86%) with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. In 82%, reperfusion had been done and all received standard of care cardiovascular medications at discharge. LVEF was 32.2 ± 3.9%, measured 5.1 ± 3.0 days after MI. Of the 233 patients who completed monitoring (7.1 ± 1.5 days), 81 (35%) experienced significant arrhythmias, including Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation (VT/ VF): 10 (4.3%); frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs): 65 (28%); Atrial Fibrillation (AF): 8 (3.4%); chronic atrial flutter: 4 (1.7%); 2nd or 3rd degree Atrioventricular (AV) block: 4 (1.7%); and symptomatic bradycardia: 8 (3.4%). In total, 26 patients died. Mortality was higher in patients with clinically significant arrhythmia (at 12 months: 23.6% vs 4.8% with 19 vs 7 deaths, hazard ratio (HR) ¼ 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3 to 13.0, p < 0.0001). Excluding 7 deaths during ELR monitoring, HR ¼ 4.5, p < 0.001. Conclusion: ELR applied in patients with acute MI and LV dysfunction at the time of discharge identifies patients with high mortality risk.