Effect of two primary revisions for dystrophic or atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft after intramedullary nailing on health-related quality of life / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To explore the effect of primary exchange reamed nailing (ERN) and augmentation compression plating (ACP) combined with autogenous bone grafting (ABG) on health-related quality of life in patients with dystrophic or atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft after intramedullary nailing. Methods The study used a prospective study method. Sixty- two patients with femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing from August 2010 to October 2016 were selected, and the patients were divided into ERN group (group A, 32 cases) and ACP group (group B, 30 cases) by random digits table method. In group A, isthmus nonunion was in 18 cases (56.2％), and non-isthmus nonunion in 14 cases (43.8％); in group B, isthmus nonunion was in 16 cases (53.3％), and non-isthmus nonunion in 14 cases (46.7％ ). The health- related quality of life was compared between 2 groups, including physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) in the- 12- item short form health survey (SF- 12), brief pain inventory- severity (BPI- S) and brief pain inventory- interference (BPI- I). Results Fifty-four patients were followed-up for more than 1 year, and the mean follow-up time was 18.3 (13 to 37) months. All patients successfully achieved bone union, and the mean time was 5.8 (4 to 8) months. Significant improvements in terms of SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS score were noted after operation for patients with isthmus nonunion in both groups (t=3.148, 2.156, 2.456 and 2.559; P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences before and after operation in group A with non-isthmus nonunion (P >0.05). At the last follow-up, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS in group B were significantly improved compared with those in group A: (45.2 ± 5.8) scores vs. (33.6 ± 4.7) scores and (48.8 ± 6.5) scores vs. (39.4 ± 5.6) scores, and there were statistical difference (P<0.05); SF-12 BPI-S and BPI-I showed obvious relief: (4.6 ± 2.1) scores vs. (6.2 ± 2.5) scores and (5.2 ± 1.9) scores vs. (6.8 ± 2.7) scores, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05); however there were no statistical difference in SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, BPI-S and BPI- I between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with ERN combined with ABG, ACP combined with ABG can significantly improve the quality of life in patients with dystrophic or atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft after intramedullary nailing. It has greater advantage on the improvement of health-related quality of life, especially for patients with non-isthmus nonunion.

Analysis on risk factors of re-nonunion after primary revision for femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To analyze the related risk factors of re-nonunion after primary revision for femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing. Methods A retrospective study was performed in 61 patients with femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing from June 2008 to June.All patients were divided into re-nonunion group(22 cases)and non-re-nonunion group (39 cases) according to diagnostic criteria of bone re-nonunion. Univariate analysis was used to analyze 14 factors that may lead to the occurrence of re-nonunion after revision for femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol abuse, injury reason, fracture types, intramedullary nail types, locking screws technology for intramedullary nail, bone nonunion sites, bone nonunion time, pathological types of bone nonunion, primary revision methods and autologous bone graft or not, and multi-factor logistic regression analysis was performed on the factors showing a significant difference. Results Univariate analysis showed significant difference in smoking (χ2= 6.564, P = 0.036), BMI (χ2= 6.783, P = 0.021), bone nonunion sites(χ2=7.316,P=0.011),primary revision methods(χ2=8.069,P=0.003)and autologous bone graft or not(χ 2=6.668,P=0.027).Logistic regression analysis showed that primary revision methods(OR=1.027,95% CI 0.028-0.463,P<0.05)and autologous bone graft or not(OR=1.024,95% CI 0.006-0.363, P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for re-nonunion after revision of femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing. Conclusions Primary revision methods and autologous bone graft or not are independent risk factors for re-nonunion after revision of femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing.By strictly controlling the surgical indications and combining with autogenous bone grafting,it is possible to reduce the occurrence of nonunion after primary revision of the femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing.

Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation accompanying with lumbar instability with internal fixation and spinal fusion / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore operative effect of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation accompanying with lumbar instability.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Form June 2000 to June 2006, 46 patients of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation accompanying with lumbar instability were treated with decompression through posterior approach, diskectomy, spinal fusion and vertebral pedicle internal fixation. Including 33 males and 13 females,the age was from 37 to 68 years with an average of 48 years. The course of disease was from 4 months to 20 years with an average of 3.5 years. There were simple segment in 21 cases, double segments in 22 cases, three segments in 3 cases.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All patients were followed up for 12-45 months with an average of 25 months. All cases got solid fusion and clinical symptom improved obviously. According to clinical standard to evaluation, 32 cases obtained excellent result, 8 good, 6 fair. The rate of excellent and good was 86.9%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Diskectomy, spinal fusion and internal fixation can obtain satisfactory clinical effect for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation accompanying with lumbar instability.</p>

Operative treatment of benign bone tumor defects in proximal joint by fibula transplantation with vascular and artificial joint replacement / 中国综合临床

Objective To explore the reconstructive methods of benign bone tumor defects in proximal joint. Methods Operative treatment was performed in 11 cases with benign bone tumor defects in proximal joint, a-mong whom 4 cases were treated by curettage,cauterization of wall and bone grafting,3 cases were treated by filling branch through segment fibula transplantation with vascular,2 cases were treated by fibula head transplantation with vascular to reconstruct the glenohumeral joint and rediocarpal joint, and 2 cases were treated by artificial joint re-placement. Results The follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 6 years. All of cases got excellent bone unioned without re-lapse and 2 cases of them developed with little limitation in joint function. Conclusion The importance and recon-structive achievement of fibula transplantation in treating the benign bone tumor defects in proximal joint should be thought fully. The indication of artificial tumor prosthesis replacement should be strictly mastered.