Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care. 2017; 21 (2): 141-146
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-189137

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare the effect of adding two different doses of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine, on onset and duration of analgesia for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients scheduled for upper limb orthopedic surgery


Methodology: This prospective randomized double blind comparative study was conducted at our institution. After ethical committee approval and informed patient consents, 50 patients of ASA I, II and aged 21-60 years, who were scheduled for elective upper limb surgery and were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two equal groups. They received either 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine [1 micro g/kg] diluted with normal saline up to 5 ml [total volume = 35 ml] in Group 1 or 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine [2 micro g/kg] diluted with normal saline up to 5 ml [total volume = 35 ml] in Group 2. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, sedation score, VAS and side effects were recorded


Results: Onset time of sensory and motor block were earlier in Group 2 than in Group 1 [p < 0.001]. Duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia were longer in Group 2 than in Group 1 [p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia between both the groups [p > 0.05]. There was a statistically significant reduction in number of rescue analgesic doses and total dose consumption in 24 hours in Group 2 than in Group 1. Quantitative data are represented as arithmetic mean and standard deviation and analyzed using Student's t test or ANOVA as per need. Qualitative data are represented as number [proportion or percentage] and analyzed using Chi square test. The levels of significance and alpha-error were kept 95% and 5% respectively for all statistical analyses. P values < 0.05 were considered significant


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Clavícula , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Doble Ciego , Analgesia , Amidas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA