How Should ICDs Be Stopped in the Terminal Phase of Cancer?: Five Cases of Patients in a Palliative Care Unit

<p>From January 2015 to January 2017, we encountered five terminal cancer patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the palliative care unit of our hospital. Due to delirium or dementia, four of these five patients did not have the decision-making capacity to stop their ICD. Although one patient was capable of making his own decisions, his family did not agree with the medical professional considering the patient’s decision. The families of all five patients made decisions on behalf of the patients. The procedure for stopping the ICD was first discussed with the families at 2–21 days prior to the patients’ deaths. The ICDs were stopped between 3 h and 11 days prior to the patients’ deaths, following the consent of the families, which was obtained after 1–5 consultations. Through these experiences, we became aware of the following problems with regard to stopping ICDs: (1) the lack of experience of medical professionals in decision-making, (2) the lack of recognition of medical professionals to the distress caused to patients by ICDs, (3) the psychological burden and time constraint of discussions, and (4) the lack of knowledge of ICDs among patients and their families. These problems need to be addresses as part of advance care planning for cancer patients. </p>

Frequency of Serious Adverse Skin Reactions Caused by Continuous Subcutaneous Administration of Psychotropic Drugs

Continuous subcutaneous injections of medication are effective in controlling symptoms of the terminal stage of cancer. Chlorpromazine and levomepromazine occasionally cause skin irritation. We examined all patients who underwent continuous subcutaneous administration of psychotropic drugs (chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, midazolam) at the palliative care unit of our hospital from April 2010 to March 2013, the frequency of adverse skin reactions of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 grade 3 or above. Of the 603 hospitalized patients, 389 (64.5%) underwent continuous subcutaneous administration of one of the three drugs. The frequency of grade 3 or above (ulceration or necrosis) adverse skin reactions was 4 out of 345 chlorpromazine cases (1.2%; 95% CI: 0.0-2.3%), 2 out of 90 levomepromazine cases (2.2%; 95% CI: −0.8-5.2%), and 0 out of 210 midazolam cases (0.0%; 95% CI: 0.0-0.0%). The frequency of serious adverse skin reactions caused by continuous subcutaneous administration of psychotropic drugs was low, suggesting that this treatment is relatively safe for the skin.

A case report of intractable nausea due to zoledronic acid-refractory hypercalcemia treated with denosumab

Introduction: We report a case of intractable nausea due to zoledronic acid-refractory hypercalcemia for which the nausea was alleviated with denosumab, thereby improving quality of life. Case: A 54-year-old woman presented with metastatic renal pelvis cancer. Elevation of serum calcium level and nausea were noted. After multiple antiemetics were administered with no appreciable symptomatic improvement, treatment with zoledronic acid resulted in a decrease in the calcium level and an improvement of nausea from Japanese version Support Team Assessment Schedule （STAS-J） 3 to 1. After the third dose of zoledronic acid, the corrected calcium level was 11.8 mg/dl, indicating refractory. Because no improvement in nausea was noted, treatment with denosumab was initiated. After the treatment, the calcium level decreased to 9.4 mg/dl, and nausea improved from STAS-J 4 to 0. The patient could spend good time with her family, albeit for a short time, and no progression of the symptoms or adverse events due to denosumab occurred until her death. Discussion: Denosumab appears to be useful for improvement of intractable nausea in zoledronic acid-refractory hypercalcemia.