Serological follow up of positive SARS-CoV-2 cases / Seguimiento serológico de casos positivos a SARS-CoV-2

Abstract: Objective: To describe the humoral response in a cohort with mild and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection previously identified in a community-based serological survey. Materials and methods: This study was an observational follow up of 193 subjects previously identified with positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies invited for a second test 112 days after the first sampling. All completed a standardized electronic questionnaire. IgM/IgG antibodies were determined using a qualitative IgM/IgG chemiluminescent immunoassay. Results: Among the 193 eligible subjects, a total of 174 (90%) attended the follow-up visit, and their serum samples were tested. Of the samples, 171 (98.3%) were still positive, and 3 (1.7%) were negative. Also, the cut-off index (COI) value of the immunoassay significantly increased from the first to the second test (P <0.001). Conclusions: Our findings support a sustained humoral response in individuals with mild and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection up to 112 days after a positive serologic baseline test, accompanied by increasing antibody titers.

Resumen: Objetivo: Describir la respuesta humoral en una cohorte con una infección leve o asintomática por SARS-CoV-2, previamente identificada en una encuesta serológica comunitaria. Material y métodos: Se realizó un seguimiento observacional de 193 individuos previamente identificados con anticuerpos IgM/IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 invitados 112 días después de una determinación serológica inicial. Todos los participantes completaron un cuestionario electrónico estandarizado. Se determinaron los anticuerpos IgM/IgG mediante un inmunoensayo quimioluminiscente cualitativo. Resultados: De entre los 193 sujetos elegibles, 174 (90%) acudieron al seguimiento. De las muestras, 171 (98.3%) eran positivas y 3 (1.7%) negativas. Además, el valor de COI del inmunoenasayo se incrementó al comparar la primera y segunda determinación (P <0.001). Conclusiones: Los presentes resultados apoyan una respuesta humoral sostenida en individuos con infección por SARS-CoV-2 con síntomas leves o asintomática hasta 112 días después de una prueba serológica positiva, acompañada de incremento en los títulos de anticuerpos.

Toma de decisiones compartidas en la atención de pacientes con diabetes mellitus: un desafío para Latinoamérica / Shared decision making in patients with diabetes mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus often have several medical problems and carry a burden imposed by their illness and treatment. Health care often ignores the values, preferences and context of patients, leading to treatments that do not fit into patients’ overwhelmed lives. Shared Decision Making (SDM) emerges as a way to answer the question: “What’s best for the patient?”. SDM promotes an empathic conversation between patients and clinicians that integrates the best evidence available with their values, preferences and context. We discuss three SDM approaches for patients with diabetes: one focused on sharing information, another on making choices, and a third one on helping patients and clinicians to talk about how to address the problems of living with diabetes and its comorbidities. Despite the benefits demonstrated in studies conducted in the U.S. and Europe, the implementation of SDM continues to be a challenge. In Latin America, healthcare and socio-economic conditions render the implementation of SDM more challenging. Research aimed to respond to this challenge is necessary. Meanwhile, clinicians can practice SDM by sharing evidence-based information, giving voice to patients’ values and preferences in making choices, and creating empathic conversations aimed at decisions aligned with patients’ context, dreams, goals, and life expectations.

Hemoglobin A1c: a reliable and accurate test for diabetes care? A prospective study in Mexico / Hemoglobina A1c: ¿una prueba precisa y confiable para el cuidado de la diabetes ? Estudio prospectivo en México

Objective. To compare the concordance correlation coefficient for HbA1c results in an in-field experience. Materials and methods. A prospective study in Monterrey, Mexico from April to August 2012 was conducted to evaluate the day-to-day clinical situation when measuring HbA1c. Blood samples from 38 consecutive patients were sent to seven local laboratories and one international reference laboratory. Results. Poor concordance was found in 4 out of 7 laboratories, moderate in 2 out of 7, and significant in just one. HbA1c values from three laboratories fluctuated more than 1% above or below the reference laboratory in more than 30% of cases, and more than 2% in 10%-20% of subjects. Conclusions. Standardized HbA1c measurement has not occurred worldwide. Physicians should be aware of this issue and be cautious of HbA1c guidelines on diabetes diagnosis or management until proper standardization programs are implemented.

Objetivo. Comparar el coeficiente de correlación de concordancia de HbA1c. Material y métodos. Estudio prospectivo en Monterrey, México, de abril a agosto de 2012 para evaluar la medición de la HbA1c. Participaron 38 individuos y se envió la muestra a 7 laboratorios locales y a uno internacional de referencia. Resultados. Se encontró pobre concordancia en 4 de 7 laboratorios, moderada en 2 y una concordancia significativa en uno. Los valores de HbA1c de tres laboratorios fluctuaron más de 1% del laboratorio de referencia en más de 30% de los casos y más de 2% en 10 a 20%. Conclusiones. La estandarización de la HbA1c no está concluida. Los médicos deberían tomar con cautela las recomendaciones de las guías para HbA1c en el diagnóstico o manejo de la diabetes hasta que se implementen los programas de estandarización.