Cardioembolic stroke: risk factors, clinical features, and early outcome in 956 consecutive patients

ABSTRACT Background: There is little information about the early clinical features of cardioembolic stroke before complementary examinations. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors, clinical features, and early outcomes of cardioembolic stroke. Methods: Retrospective study based on prospectively collected data available from a university medical center hospital-based stroke registry. Consecutive patients diagnosed with cardioembolic infarction were selected and compared to those diagnosed with an atherothrombotic stroke. Predictors of cardioembolic infarction were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: From a cohort of 4597 consecutive patients, we studied 956 patients diagnosed with cardioembolic infarction (80 years [standard deviation (SD) 9.14]; 63% women) and 945 with atherothrombotic infarction (77.01 years [SD 9.75]; 49.8% women). The univariate comparative analysis reported that advanced age (≥ 85 years), female gender, atrial fibrillation (AF), ischemic heart disease, and congestive heart failure were significantly more frequent in the cardioembolic group, whereas hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, heavy smoking, hyperlipidemia, and previous transient ischemic attack were significant in the atherothrombotic group. In the logistic regression model, AF (odds ratio [OR] 15.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.14-20.42), ischemic heart disease (OR 3.12, 95% CI: 2.16-4.5), female gender (OR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-2.00), and sudden-onset (OR 1.97, 95% CI: 1.54-2.51), were independent significant predictors of cardioembolic stroke. Conclusions: Potential cardioembolic stroke requires a comprehensive evaluation, since early classification and identification through predictors would improve effective management. (REV INVEST CLIN. 2021;73(1):23-30)

Perfil clínico diferencial entre los infartos lacunares y los infartos cerebrales aterotrombóticos / Differential clinical profile of lacunar infarcts compared to atherothrombotic brain infarcts

Aims and objectives: The present study makes a comparative analysis between the clinical profile of lacunar infarcts (LI) and that of atherothrombotic brain infarcts (ABI). Methods: Hospital-based descriptive study of 1809 consecutive patients admitted over a period of 24 years with a diagnosis of lacunar cerebral infarction (n = 864) or atherothrombotic cerebral infarction (n = 945). A comparative analysis of the demographic data, cerebral vascular risk factors, clinical data and hospital evolution between both subtypes of cerebral infarction was performed using a univariate and multivariate statistical methodology. Results: LI accounted for 26.5% and ABI for 28.9% of all cerebral infarctions in the registry. The variables directly and independently associated with ABI were: ischemic heart disease, previous transient ischemic attack, previous cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease, anticoagulant therapy, age > 85 years, vegetative symptoms, decreased level of consciousness, sensory deficit, visual deficit, speech disorders, and neurological, respiratory and urinary complications during hospital admission. In contrast, the absence of neurological symptoms at hospital discharge was directly associated with LI. Conclusions: LI and ABI have a distinct clinical profile. The best functional prognosis of LI during the acute phase of the disease is characteristic. In contrast, ICAs have a higher atherosclerotic burden and a worse prognosis.

Fundamentos y objetivo: El objetivo del estudio es efectuar un análisis comparativo entre el perfil clínico de los infartos lacunares (IL) y el perfil de los infartos cerebrales aterotrombóticos (ICA). Métodos: Estudio hospitalario descriptivo de 1809 pacientes consecutivos ingresados durante un período de 24 años con el diagnóstico de infarto cerebral de tipo lacunar (n = 864) o por infarto cerebral aterotrombótico (ICA) (n = 945). Se realizó un análisis comparativo de los datos demográficos, factores de riesgo vascular cerebral, datos clínicos y de evolución hospitalaria utilizando una metodología estadística univariada y, posteriormente, multivariada. Resultados: Los IL representaron el 26.5% y los ICA el 28.9% del total de infartos cerebrales del registro. Las variables asociadas directamente y de forma independiente con los ICA fueron: cardiopatía isquémica, ataque isquémico transitorio previo, infarto cerebral previo, enfermedad vascular periférica, uso de anticoagulantes, edad > 85 años, síntomas vegetativos, disminución del nivel de conciencia, déficit sensitivo, déficit visual, trastornos del habla y complicaciones neurológicas, respiratorias y urinarias durante el ingreso hospitalario. En cambio, la ausencia de sintomatología neurológica al alta se asoció directamente con los IL. Conclusiones: Los IL y los ICA tienen un perfil clínico diferenciado. Es característico el mejor pronóstico funcional de los IL durante la fase aguda de la enfermedad. En cambio, los ICA presentan mayor carga aterosclerótica y peor pronóstico evolutivo.