Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a two years experience at combined military hospital Malir cantt Karachi

Objective: To compare the safety, outcome and advantages of three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Study Design: Prospective descriptive study

Place and Duration of Study: The study was done at Combined Military Hospital Malir Cantt Karachi starting, from Mar 2013 to Oct 2015

Material and Methods: Total 200 patients who had undergone gall bladder removal laparospically were studied. Complication rate, duration of operation, insertion of 4th port, converting laparoscopic method to open, duration of hospital admission, early return to work and need of analgesics were studied in patients with three ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC] vs. four ports LC

Results: A total of 200 patients who had removal gall bladder laparospically, three-port LC were performed in 117 [58.5%] patients and four-port LC was performed in 83 [41.5%] patient. There was no significant difference with respect to complication rate, converting to open technique and duration of operation were comparable to four ports LC. One patient required 4th port in left hypochondrium for liver retractor to retract enlarged left liver lobe

Conclusion: LC using thee ports can be performed safely when done by experts in this method. The said procedure has significant benefits over the conventional four-port method with respect to decreased use of pain killers and duration of hospital admission

Five years experience of carcinoma breast

To evaluate the presentation, staging and histology of carcinoma breast patients admitted over a period of five years A retrospective analytical study was conducted at surgical unit two, Civil Hospital Karachi over a period of five years from October 2001 to October 2006. Eighty five female patients with biopsy proven carcinoma breast admitted and operated, were included in the study. 43.5% patients were under the age of 45 years. 4.7%had family history, 49.4%were premenopausal, none had history of oral contraceptive intake. 84.7% had breast fed their siblings, 12% were nulliparous. 29.4% had skin involvement at presentation; nipple retraction was seen in 23.5%. 90.5% had infiltrating ductal carcinoma with 58.8% having histological involvement of axillary lymph nodes. 50% had stage 3 and 41% stage 2 cancers. The risk / predisposing factors for carcinoma breast were not significantly present in our study population. Most of the patients at presentation had stage two and three carcinoma, with the predominant cancer type being infiltrating ductal carcinoma