A Comparison of the Short-term Morbidity and Mortality Between Late Preterm and Term Newborns

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Late preterm babies are defined as those born between 34 to 36 completed weeks. There has been a recent increased awareness that this group of babies has a higher incidence of morbidity as compared to term babies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term morbidities occurring in this group of babies managed in the neonatal unit at Singapore General Hospital (SGH).</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A retrospective study was done of babies managed in the neonatal unit at SGH from January 2005 to December 2008. Maternal, perinatal and neonatal data were obtained from the departmental database. The outcomes of late preterm infants were compared with term infants.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 6826 babies were admitted. Ten percent (681 out of 6826) of babies were late preterm babies, making up 63% (681 out of 1081) of all preterm babies. Late preterm babies had significantly greater need for resuscitation at birth. They also had statistically significant increased risks of developing hyaline membrane disease (2.5% vs 0.1%), transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) (8.1% vs 1.7%), pneumonia (7.0% vs 2.8%), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (4.3% vs 1.1%), hypotension (0.7% vs 0%), apnoea (3.7% vs 0%), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (1.5% vs 0.3%), polycythaemia (2.2% vs 1.0%), anaemia (3.4% vs 1.2%), thrombocytopenia (3.2% vs 0.6%), hypoglycaemia (6.6% vs 1.7%), neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy (41.1% vs 12.2%) and sepsis (1.7% vs 0.6%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Late preterm infants are indeed a vulnerable group of infants with significant morbidities that need to be addressed and treated. Despite their relatively large size and being almost term, the understanding that late preterm infants are not similar to term infants is important to both obstetricians and neonatologists.</p>

Short- and long-term outcomes at 2, 5 and 8 years old for neonates at borderline viability--an 11-year experience

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Neurodevelopmental outcome of borderline viability neonates have lagged behind improvement in survival figures. Accurate figures based on local outcome allow us to better counsel parents and to prognosticate with greater accuracy on both short- and longterm outcomes.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A retrospective cohort study of 101 consecutively born neonates, born from 21 to 26 weeks gestation over an 11-year period from 1 January 1994 to 31 December 2005 was conducted. Long-term outcomes were assessed at 2, 5 and 8 years of age in terms of mental developmental index (MDI) or intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, hearing and visual impairments, handicaps and impairments, school placement and interventions required.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Survival rates were 20.0%, 60.9%, 70.4% and 73.2% for neonates born at 21 to 23, 24, 25 and 26 weeks gestation respectively. Factors that predicted increased mortality included higher alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO2) with odds ratio (OR) 1.005 and lower birth weight OR 0.993. Rates of severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (stage 3 or worse) were 100%, 57.1%, 42.1% and 26.7% for 21 to 23, 24, 25 and 26 weeks gestation respectively. Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) were 100.0%, 57.1%, 63.2% and 60.0% respectively. Rates of severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) were 0%, 7.1%, 5.3% and 10.0% respectively. Moderate to severe disability rates at 2 years old were 100%, 44.4%, 33.3% and 30.4% respectively. At 5 years old, moderate to severe disability rates were 16.7%, 22.2% and 14.3% respectively for those born at 24, 25 and 26 weeks gestation. Interpretation at 8 years was limited by small numbers.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our results indicated that local figures for mortality and morbidity remained high at the limits of viability, although they were comparable to outcomes for large scale studies in advanced countries.</p>