Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 54(4): e10273, 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1153542

RESUMEN

Vascular invasion and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) are risk factors for the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. At present, the correlation between the two is not clear. This meta-analysis explored the relationship between preoperative SII and vascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. According to the search formula, the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were searched for the relevant research until March 2020. After the quality evaluation of the included literature, the odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effect measure. Stata 15. 0 software was used for statistical analysis. The meta-analysis eventually included seven retrospective cohort studies of 3583 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The results showed that the choice of SII cut-off value affects SII's efficiency in predicting the risk of vascular invasion. In the cohort of studies with appropriate SII cut-off value, the high SII preoperative group had a higher risk of vascular invasion (OR=2.62; 95%CI: 2.07-3.32; P=0.000) and microvascular invasion (OR=1.82; 95%CI: 1.01-3.25; P=0.045) than the low SII group. The tumor diameter (OR=2.88; 95%CI: 1.73-4. 80; P=0.000) of the high SII group was larger than that of the low SII group. There was no publication bias in this study (Begg's test, P=0.368). As a routine, cheap, and easily available index, SII can provide a certain reference value for clinicians to evaluate vascular invasion before operation.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Inflamación
2.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 52(5): e8265, 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001531

RESUMEN

We determined the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric carcinoma. Sixty patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma in Lishui Hospital between March and October 2016 were randomized to receive either ERAS (30 patients) or conventional care (30 patients, controls). Clinical, economic, and laboratory indices were analyzed. ERAS patients showed faster recovery and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the controls (P<0.05). Some clinical indices (i.e., time to first flatus and defecation, time to removal of drainage tubes, time to resumption of oral feeding, time to postoperative mobilization, and postoperative complications) were significantly better in ERAS patients than in controls. Duration of postoperative infusion was lower in ERAS patients than in controls (P<0.05). In ERAS patients, serum albumin and prealbumin were higher on postoperative day 7, C-reactive protein was lower on postoperative days 3 and 7, and neutrophil count was lower on postoperative day 3 compared to the values in controls (P<0.05 for all). IgM levels were higher in ERAS patients on postoperative days 3 and 7 (P<0.05), while IgG levels were higher on postoperative day 3 (P<0.05). Total T lymphocytes were higher in ERAS patients on postoperative day 3, while helper T cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were higher on postoperative days 3 and 7 (P<0.05 for all). In gastric carcinoma patients, ERAS may reduce perioperative inflammation, improve immunity and postoperative nutrition, shorten hospitalization, and enhance rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Gastrectomía/rehabilitación , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recuperación de la Función , Tiempo de Internación , Estadificación de Neoplasias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA