RESUMEN
The academic thinking of WU Pei-heng derived from the theory of thinking highly of yang-qi in Inner Canon of Huangdi and the theory of waming yang to support vital qi in Treatise on Febrile Diseases. He considered that the yang-qi was the essence of the life, warming yang and assisting yang was the core of his academic thinking. He was good at using Radix Aconiti Lateralis Preparata with hige dosage. The 4 cases in this article proved the science and practicality of warming yang and assisting yang.
RESUMEN
The academic thoughts of WU Pei-heng originate from the theory of emphasizing yang in Inner Canon of Huangdi and warming and assisting yang theory in Treatise on Cold Pathogenic Diseases,which inherits and develops the theorectical essence of ZHENG Qin-an.The core of WU Pei-heng’s academic thoughts is the importance of yang-qi in human body.In his opinion,yang-qi is the essence of human,warming yang is the basic principle and treatment in clinic,large dose of aconite root should be used to saving critical patient.In addition,two cases treated by warming yang method are recorded to verify the practicability of WU Pei-heng’s thoughts.
RESUMEN
Objective: To observe the effect of L-carniti ne (L-CN) in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). Meth ods: Fifty-six cases of chronic CHF randomly received routine treatment (Digitalis, diuretics, vasodilator, ACEI or βblocker) or L-CN (3.0 g/d ,V D×10 d) with routine therapy. Results: The treatment efficiency of L-CN group and control group were 89.3% and 60.7% (P<0.01), respect ively. No adverse reactions related to the drug were observed. Conclusio n: L-CN with routine therapy might be a safe way to the treat CHF.
RESUMEN
Objective: To observe the effect of L carnitine ( L CN) in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). Methods: Fifty six cases of chronic CHF randomly received routine treatment (Digitalis, diuretics, vasodilator, ACEI or ?blocker) or L CN (3.0 g/d ,VD?10 d) with routine therapy. Results: The treatment efficiency of L CN group and control group were 89.3% and 60.7% ( P