RESUMEN
Objective@#To compare the surgical accuracy of the 3D printing surgical guide and traditional occlusal splint in the treatment of skeletal facial asymmetry cases.@*Methods@#12 facial asymmetric patients underwent joint orthognathic and orthodontics treatments were included in this research. In the 3D printing group (n=6) the pre-surgical CT scan for the skeleton and laser scan for the dentures were performed and 3D orthognathic procedures including Le FortⅠ and BSSRO combined with genioplasty were planned. The 3D printing surgical guides were manufactured and applied during surgeries. Another 6 cases were received same procedures by traditional occlusal splint techniques as the control group. Post-surgical CT reconstruction and 3D superimposition with pre-surgical planning was carried out for outcome comparison.@*Results@#The maximal error of maxillar was 0.65 mm and average error was less than 1 mm in 3D printing group, while the maxillary maximal error was 2.11 mm and average error was greater than 1 mm in traditional group which showed the statistical significance (P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#The usage of 3D printing surgical guide could improve the orthognathic surgical precision by controlling the jaw bone in a three-dimensional way.