Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-37380

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of subjective sonographic assessment in distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS: The patients scheduled for elective surgery due to adnexal masses were recruited into the study. All patients were sonographically examined within 72 hours of surgery were subjectively evaluated by the experienced sonographer, who had no any information of the patients, to differentiate between benign and malignant adnexal masses based on sonographic morphology. The final diagnoses, used as gold standard, were based on either pathological or operative findings. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients with 174 adnexal masses, (benign; 108 and malignant; 66) were recruited into the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were of 89.7%, 84.9 % and 92.6 %, 87.5% and 90.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective evaluation of sonographic morphology has high accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/ultraestructura , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Endometrioide/ultraestructura , Estudios Transversales , Cistadenoma Seroso/ultraestructura , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Doppler
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA