RESUMEN
Objective To compare the effect of diversification rehabilitation team mode on function in patients with cerebral infarction. Methods Sixty-six patients with cerebral infarction were divided into diversification rehabilitation team mode group (diversification group) and routine rehabilitation mode (routine group) according to the rehabililation method with 33 cases each. All patients of 2 groups were treated for 2 weeks. Evaluations were made before and after treatment. The simplified Fugl-Meyer motor function rating scale was used to evaluate motor function, modified Barthel index was used to evaluate activities of daily living, and MOS 36-item short form health survey was used to evaluate quality of life;and 0-100 digital simulation assessment was used to evaluate patient satisfaction after treatment. Results The simplified Fugl-Meyer motor function rating scale score, modified Barthel index score, MOS 36-item short form health survey score and patient satisfaction rate after treatment in diversification group were significantly better than those in routine group: (76 ± 4) scores vs. (63 ± 3) scores, (65 ± 3) scores vs. (52 ± 4 ) scores, (57 ± 7) scores vs. (44 ± 6) scores, (92 ± 5) scores vs. (77 ± 3) scores, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05). Conclusions Both kinds of rehabilitation model can promote functional recovery in patients with cerebral infarction, but diversification rehabilitation team model is better than conventional model.