Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-232518

RESUMEN

Background: Gynaecological emergencies are common causes of emergency hospital presentation/admission. Majority of the emergencies are mostly pregnancy related and pose threat to two lives as well as the women’s future reproductive careers. There is therefore need to evaluate them to make better preparations in managing them.Methods: This was a 10 year (from 01 January 2012 to 31 December 2021) retrospective study of gynaecological emergencies managed at Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki (AEFUTHA), evaluating their management and outcomes.Results: The commonest cause of gynaecological emergency at AEFUTHA was miscarriage accounting for up to 69.1% out of which incomplete miscarriage contributed 70.8% and majority had manual vacuum aspiration with good outcome. Ruptured ectopic pregnancies were the commonest surgical emergencies with the incidence of 7.1% and all had laparotomy and partial salpingectomy. Gestational trophoblastic diseases accounted for 2.0% of gynaecological emergencies. The commonest non-pregnancy related gynaecological emergency was acute pelvic inflammatory diseases which accounted for 9.3% of cases. Other gynaecological emergencies reviewed were ovarian accidents (2.9%), abnormal uterine bleeding (3.9%), gynaecological malignancies (2.3%), coital laceration (1.5%), sexual assault (2.4%) and Bartholin’s abscess (0.2%). Factors that affected the outcome were the age of the patients, marital status and disease type and were statistically significant (p<0.05).Conclusions: Management outcomes of gynaecological emergencies were optimum. Mortality occurred in 1.3% of cases, with gynaecological malignancies accounting for 81.4%. There is usually a good prognosis when prompt, accurate diagnosis and treatment are administered.

2.
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-232507

RESUMEN

Background: Better birth initiative is a global initiative that promotes humane and evidence-based care for women during childbirth. This study was designed to assess compliance to aspects of better birth initiative and maternal satisfaction with a view to making recommendations.Methods: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study of 396 consenting post-partum women to assess maternity services at AEFUTHA. A sample size of 423 was determined at power of 90% and ?-error of 0.05. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. Chi-square was used to analyze categorical variables and odds ratios determined. Continuous variables were expressed as mean or standard deviation. P value of <0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.Results: Out of a total of 423 questionnaires deployed, only 396 were completed and duly returned (giving a 93.6% response rate). Majority of the parturient were between the ages of 20 to 34 years (80.3%), multiparas (74.2%) and with tertiary education (74.2%). Although many (74.2%) were not allowed companions, free mobility (78.8%), food (70.7%) and position of choice in labour (100%), they were satisfied with the care. Factors that likely affected maternal satisfaction were the age of participants, having a companion in labour, having a dedicated midwife to each parturient, free mobility in labour, oral fluid intake in labour and good health worker attitude (p value: 0.002, 0.024, 0.002, 0.0002, 0.0001 and 0.00001 respectively).Conclusions: There is need to continuously enlighten health professionals on aspects of better birth initiatives in order to improve client’s satisfaction.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA