Psychological and financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the first stages of the pandemic: Brazilian orthodontists´ perspective

ABSTRACT Introduction: Brazil faced a catastrophic situation in the coronavirus pandemic. Due to the high risk of contamination and spread of COVID-19, dentist have been attending only urgency and emergency services in Brazil at the beginning of the pandemic. Objective: This research aimed to evaluate the psychological and financial impacts caused by the coronavirus pandemic in Brazilian orthodontists. Methods: This population-based cross-sectional study collected demographic data and mental health measurements from 404 orthodontists. Depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress were evaluated through Brazilian versions of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (9-PHQ), the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale and Mini-Tracking (GAD), the 7-item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), respectively. The demographic data of the sample was described using descriptive statistics. The data was analyzed according to sex, professional status, and economic income. Comparisons were performed using Chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Kruskal-Wallis followed by post-hoc tests. Results: Females, graduate students, and lower incomes subgroups showed higher levels of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress. Most orthodontists showed moderate to extreme financial and professional concerns during the pandemic. Conclusion: The coronavirus pandemic negatively affected the psychological health and increased the financial concerns of the Brazilian orthodontists, mainly female, graduate students, and with income below 10k participants.

RESUMO Introdução: O Brasil enfrentou uma situação catastrófica durante a pandemia do coronavírus. Devido ao alto risco de contaminação e disseminação do vírus da COVID-19, os cirurgiões-dentistas passaram a realizar apenas atendimentos de urgência ou emergência no início da pandemia. Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o impacto financeiro e psicológico causado pela pandemia do coronavírus nos ortodontistas brasileiros. Métodos: Este estudo transversal de base populacional coletou os dados demográficos e o impacto da pandemia em 404 ortodontistas. Depressão, ansiedade, insônia e angústia foram avaliadas, respectivamente, por meio da versão em português do Questionário de Saúde do Paciente (PHQ-9), do módulo de transtorno de ansiedade generalizada (GAD) do Mini-Tracking (GAD/Mini-Tracking), do Índice de Severidade de Insônia (ISI) e o do Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). As características demográficas da amostra foram apresentadas por meio de estatística descritiva. Os dados foram analisados de acordo com o sexo, situação profissional e renda econômica. As comparações foram realizadas utilizando os testes de Qui-quadrado, Mann-Whitney U e Kruskal-Wallis, seguidos de testes post-hoc (p<0,05). Resultados: Mulheres, estudantes de pós-graduação e profissionais com menores rendas apresentaram níveis mais altos de depressão, ansiedade, insônia e angústia. A maioria dos ortodontistas mostrou preocupação financeira e profissional moderada a extrema durante a pandemia. Conclusão: A pandemia do coronavírus afetou negativamente a saúde psicológica dos ortodontistas brasileiros e aumentou as preocupações financeiras desses profissionais. As mulheres, os estudantes de pós-graduação e os participantes com renda mensal menor que R$10 mil foram os grupos mais afetados.

Class II malocclusion treatment changes with the Jones jig, Distal jet and First Class appliances

Abstract Objective Maxillary molar distalization with intraoral distalizer appliances is a non-extraction orthodontic treatment used to correct molar relationship in patients with Class II malocclusion presenting maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and minor skeletal discrepancies. This study compares the changes caused by three distalizers with different force systems. Methodology 71 patients, divided into three groups, were included. The Jones jig group (JJG, n=30; 16 male, 14 female, 13.17 years mean age) was treated with the Jones jig for 0.8 years. The Distal jet group (DJG, n=25; 8 male, 17 female, 12.57 years mean age) was treated with the Distal jet for 1.06 years. The First Class group (FCG, n=16; 6 male, 10 female, 12.84 years mean age) was treated with the First Class for 0.69 years. Intergroup treatment changes were compared using one-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Tukey's tests. Results Intergroup comparisons showed significantly greater maxillary incisor protrusion in DJG than in FCG (2.56±2.24 mm vs. 0.74±1.39mm, p=0.015). The maxillary first premolars showed progressive and significantly smaller mesial angulation in JJG, FCG and DJG, respectively (14.65±6.31º, 8.43±3.99º, 0.97±3.16º; p<0.001). They also showed greater mesialization in JJG than FCG (3.76±1.46 mm vs. 2.27±1.47 mm, p=0.010), and greater extrusion in DJG compared to JJG (0.90±0.77 mm vs 0.11±0.60 mm, p=0.004). The maxillary second premolars showed progressive and significantly smaller mesial angulation and mesialization in JJG, FCG and DJG, respectively (12.77±5.78º, 3.20±3.94º, -2.12±3.71º and 3.87±1.34 mm, 2.25±1.40 mm, 1.24±1.26 mm, respectively; p<0.001). DJG showed smaller distal angulation of maxillary first molars (-2.14±5.09º vs. -7.73±4.28º and -6.05±3.76º, for the JJG and FCG, respectively; p<0.001) and greater maxillary second molars extrusion (1.17±1.41 mm vs -0.02±1.16 mm and 0.16±1.40 mm, for the JJG and FCG, respectively; p=0.003). Overjet change was significantly larger in DJG compared to FCG (1.79±1.67 mm vs 0.68±0.84; p=0.046). Treatment time was smaller in FCG (0.69±0.22 years vs 0.81±0.33 years and 1.06±0.42 years, comparing it with the JJG and DJG, respectively; p=0.005). Conclusion The three appliances corrected the Class II molar relationship by dentoalveolar changes. The Distal jet produced smaller molar distal angulation than the Jones jig and First Class. The First Class appliance showed less anchorage loss, greater percentage of distalization and shorter treatment time than the Jones jig and Distal jet.

Classe II tratada com distalizador associado à ancoragem esquelética / Angle class II malocclusion treated with intraoral distalizer associated with skeletal anchorage

O caso relatado no presente artigo refere-se a uma paciente com má oclusão de Classe II de Angle que foi tratada em duas fases: a primeira consistindo na instalação de um distalizador intrabucal First Class modificado, associado a mini-implantes no palato e a segunda consistindo no aparelho fixo. A severidade da discrepância anteroposterior era moderada, com apinhamento leve em ambos os arcos, sem comprometimento esquelético significante. O aparelho promoveu distalização dos molares, bem como uma pequena perda de ancoragem nos dentes anteriores à distalização. A segunda fase com aparelho fixo visou promover o alinhamento e nivelamento dos arcos, bem como a retração anterior, auxiliada por uma ancoragem baseada em um botão de Nance associado aos mini-implantes. Ao final do tratamento foram observadas a correção da discrepância anteroposterior dos arcos, bem como uma oclusão balanceada e estética satisfatória.(AU)

The present case report refers to a patient with Angle Class II malocclusion who was treated in two phases: the first phase consisting of the installation of a modified First Class intraoral distalizer associated with mini implants on the palate, and the second phase consisting of a fixed appliance. The anteroposterior discrepancy severity was moderate, with light crowding in both arches, without significant skeletal component. The device promoted distalization of the molars, as well as a small loss of anchorage in the anterior teeth. The second phase with a fixed appliance promoted the alignment and leveling of the arches, as well as the anterior retraction, assisted by an anchorage reinforcement based on a Nance button associated to the mini implants. At the end of the treatment the anteroposterior discrepancy was corrected and a balanced and esthetic occlusion was observed.(AU)

Cantilever ancorado a mini implante para distalização de molares superiores / Cantilever with mini-screw for maxillary molar

Dentre as diversas formas de tratar a má oclusão de Classe II, a distalização de molares superiores com aparelhos intrabucais fixos é uma alternativa conservadora e com mínima necessidade de colaboração do paciente. O cantilever para distalização utilizado no presente caso clínico, confeccionado no Departamento de Ortodontia da Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, é ancorado a um mini-implante e tem o objetivo de ser um dispositivo simplificado, de fácil confecção, instalação e ativação. O objetivo deste relato de caso é apresentar as características deste distalizador e sua utilização em um paciente com má oclusão de Classe II, divisão 1. A relação molar de Classe I foi obtida no período de aproximadamente 5 meses, acompanhada de movimento distal dos pré-molares e sem provocar protrusão anterior.(AU)

Maxillary molar distalization with fixed intraoral appliances is a conservative alternative that requires minimal need of patient collaboration. The cantilever for molar distalization used in the present case report was made in the Department of Orthodontics of Bauru Dental School. It is anchored to a mini-screw and aims to be a simplified device, easy to make, to install and to activate. The objective of this case report is to present the characteristics of the distalizer and its use in a patient with Class II division 1 malocclusion. The Class I molar relationship was efficiently achieved after a period of 5 months, followed by premolars distal movement and overjet maintenance. (AU)