Clinical outcomes of MANTA vs suture-based vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis

Objective: A recently published randomized control trial showed different results with suture-based vascular closure device (VCD) than plug-based VCD in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The learning curve for MANTA device is steep, while the learning curve for suture based VCD is shallow as the devices are quite different. In this meta-analysis, we have compared suture-based (ProGlide and Prostar XL) vs plug-based VCDs (MANTA). Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies (using PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases) reporting the clinical outcome of plug-based vs suture-based VCDs in transfemoral TAVR patients. Results: We included nine studies with a total of 2865 patients (plug-based n ¼ 1631, suture-based n ¼ 1234). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of all bleeding when using plugbased as opposed to suture-based VCDs (RR 1.14 [0.62e2.06] I2 ¼ 72%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of secondary outcomes between two groups including major life threatening bleeding (RR 1.16 [0.38e3.58] I2 ¼ 65%), major vascular complications (RR 0.84 [0.35e2.00] I2 ¼ 55%), minor vascular complications (RR 1.05 [0.56e1.95] I2 ¼ 42%), pseudo aneurysm (RR 1.84 [0.11e29.98] I 2 ¼ 44%), stenosis-dissection (RR 0.98 [0.66e1.47] I2 ¼ 0%), VCD failure (RR 1.71 [0.96e3.04] I2 ¼ 0%), and blood transfusion (RR 1.01 [0.38e2.71], I2 ¼ 61%). Conclusion: Large bore arteriotomy closure with plug-based VCD was not superior to suture-based VCDs in this transfemoral TAVR population. There was very frequent use of secondary VCDs in suture-based VCD group which is not practical when using MANTA. Additional high-powered studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of MANTA device.

Papel dos peptídeos natriuréticos no controle, nos desfechos e no prognóstico em sepse e choque séptico / The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

RESUMO A sepse persiste como importante sobrecarga à saúde pública nos Estados Unidos e em todo o mundo. Com o crescente uso de tecnologias laboratoriais, tem se renovado o interesse na utilização de biomarcadores na sepse, para auxiliar em um processo mais preciso e direcionado para tomadas de decisão. Os peptídeos natriuréticos vem sendo cada vez mais reconhecidos por seu papel que vai além da insuficiência cardíaca. Estes peptídeos estão comumente elevados em pacientes críticos que apresentam condições de disfunção cardiopulmonar e podem ter papel na identificação de pacientes com sepse e choque séptico. São poucos os dados disponíveis em relação ao papel destes biomarcadores no diagnóstico, no controle, nos desfechos e no prognóstico de pacientes sépticos. Esta revisão procura descrever o papel dos peptídeos natriuréticos na ressuscitação volêmica, no diagnóstico de disfunção ventricular, nos desfechos e no prognóstico de pacientes com sepse. Tem sido observado que o peptídeo natriurético tipo B (BNP) e o fragmento N-terminal do peptídeo natriurético tipo B (NT-proBNP) se associam com disfunção ventricular sistólica e diastólica, tanto esquerda quanto direita, em pacientes com cardiomiopatia séptica. O BNP e o NT-proBNP podem predizer a responsividade a volume, e as tendências de medidas seriadas destes peptídeos podem ser importantes na ressuscitação volêmica. A despeito da sugestão de correlação com mortalidade, o papel do BNP nos desfechos de mortalidade e prognóstico, durante a sepse, ainda necessita melhor avaliação.

ABSTRACT Sepsis continues to be a leading public health burden in the United States and worldwide. With the increasing use of advanced laboratory technology, there is a renewed interest in the use of biomarkers in sepsis to aid in more precise and targeted decision-making. Natriuretic peptides have been increasingly recognized to play a role outside of heart failure. They are commonly elevated among critically ill patients in the setting of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and may play a role in identifying patients with sepsis and septic shock. There are limited data on the role of these biomarkers in the diagnosis, management, outcomes and prognosis of septic patients. This review seeks to describe the role of natriuretic peptides in fluid resuscitation, diagnosis of ventricular dysfunction and outcomes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) have been noted to be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. BNP/NT-proBNP may predict fluid responsiveness, and trends of these peptides may play a role in fluid resuscitation. Despite suggestions of a correlation with mortality, the role of BNP in mortality outcomes and prognosis during sepsis needs further evaluation.