RESUMEN
Eye care programs, in developing countries, are often planned using the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment, often estimated from Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys. A limitation of this planning approach is that it ignores the annual overall eye care requirements for a given population. Moreover, targets set are arbitrary, often influenced by capacity rather than need. To address this lacunae, we implemented a novel study design to estimate the annual need for comprehensive eye care in a 1.2 million populations. We conducted a population-based longitudinal study in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, India. All permanent residents of all ages were included. We conducted the study in three phases, (i) household-level enumeration and enrollment, (ii) basic eye examination (BEE) at household one-year post-enrollment, and (iii) assessment of eye care utilization and full eye examination (FEE) at central locations. All people aged 40 years and above were invited to the FEE. Those aged <40 years were invited to the FEE if indicated. In the main study, we enrolled 24,327 subjects (58% aged below 40 years and 42% aged 40 years and above). Of those less than 40 years, 72% completed the BEE, of whom 20% were referred for FEE at central location. Of the people aged ?40 years, 70% underwent FEE. Our study design provides insights for appropriate long-term public health intervention planning, resource allocation, effective service delivery, and designing of eye care services for resource-limited settings.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of manual regurgitation on pressure over the lacrimal sac (ROPLAS) versus lacrimal irrigation for screening nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in adults prior to intraocular surgeries. Methods: This cross-sectional study took place in a tertiary eye care hospital in South Tamil Nadu, India. From January to December 2017 and included consecutive patients who presented for routine cataract surgery. Prospective data collection occurred in 8369 eyes of patients who underwent cataract surgery. All patients underwent ROPLAS testing by an ophthalmologist followed by lacrimal irrigation by trained ophthalmic assistants, rechecked or confirmed in equivocal cases by ophthalmologists who were masked to the ROPLAS status. The primary outcome, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values to detect lacrimal occlusion by ROPLAS compared with lacrimal irrigation with 95% confidence intervals was estimated. Results: A total of 8369 eyes underwent cataract surgery during the time periods of the study. ROPLAS and lacrimal irrigation were performed in all eyes. The sensitivity of ROPLAS to diagnose NLDO correctly was 54.5% (95% CI, 44.8%�.9%) and its specificity was 100% (95% CI, 100%�0%). The positive and negative predictive values were 75.3% (95% CI, 65.6%-83.0%) and 99.4% (95% CI, 99.2%�.5%), respectively. Conclusion: We found that ROPLAS when used alone had very low sensitivity and low positive predictive value in detecting NLDO prior to cataract surgery as compared with lacrimal irrigation. Hence, we recommend performing ROPLAS and lacrimal irrigation in every patient as part of the routine preoperative workup prior to cataract surgery
RESUMEN
The ophthalmic lenses that come in contact with the eyes pose a high risk for the transmission of bacterial and viral infections in eye clinics. Disinfecting these lenses does not happen stringently in a busy practice. We describe a novel method of disinfecting ophthalmic contact lenses using a semiautomated lens disinfector equipment, semiautomated lens disinfector. The equipment has motors to pump in and pump out water and disinfecting solution into a reservoir bath. The used ophthalmic lenses will be placed in a tray that partially dips into the bath for disinfection. Microbiology tests that were done to check the quality of the disinfection cycle showed good outcomes. Disinfection of ophthalmic contact lenses with the new equipment appeared to effectively eliminate contaminant microorganisms. This equipment can be used in busy ophthalmic clinics to alleviate the chances of cross-infection.