Risk of bias in dentistry-related randomized controlled trials in spanish language journals

Objectives: To assess the risk of bias (RoB) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in dental journals in the Spanish language. Methods: A systematic retrospective survey was conducted of all RCTs published from 1980 to 2019 in dentistry Spanish and Latin American journals. We extracted data and performed RoB assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: 292 RCTs published in 51 journals were included. The best-rated domains were incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. The domains assessed with higher proportions of an unclear or high risk of bias were sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding of outcome assessment. There is a low proportion of RCTs published in Spanish language journals. However, the number has been increasing over the years, and the low risk of bias assessment rates across domains show an increasing trend. Conclusions: A low percentage of Spanish-language dental journals issue RCTs. Our assessment of these RCTs' RoB suggests higher difficulties in the design and conduction phase than in the posterior reporting stage.

Uso de antibióticos para instalación de implantes óseo integrados

Introducción: La extracción de dientes permanentes se puede deber a varias razones, como la caries dental, enfermedad periodontal, entre otras. Frente a este problema, surgen los implantes dentales, definidos como un dispositivo protésico aloplástico implantado en el tejido óseo, proporcionando retención y soporte para una prótesis dental fija o removible. A pesar de la alta tasa de éxito, existen fracasos en implantología, a causa de una infección postoperatoria. Es por esto, que se han incluido dentro del tratamiento distintos regímenes de terapias antibióticas, sin embargo, actualmente su efectividad para evitar complicaciones peri y postoperatorias es controversial. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metaanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados y conclusiones: Identificamos 23 revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 16 estudios primarios, de los cuales, 9 corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que la terapia antibiótica pre operatoria en comparación a placebo probablemente reduce el fracaso de los implantes y de las prótesis, sin embargo, puede generar poca o nula diferencia en las infecciones postoperatorias. Por otro lado, no está claro si el tratamiento de terapia antibiótica (perioperatoria y postoperatoria) en comparación a placebo reduce el fracaso de los implantes y de infección postoperatoria, debido a que la certeza de la evidencia existente es muy baja.

Introduction: The extraction of permanent teeth can be due to various reasons, such as dental caries, periodontal disease, among others. Faced with this problem, dental implants arise, defined as an alloplastic prosthetic device implanted in bone tissue, providing retention and support for a fixed or removable dental prosthesis. Despite the high success rate, there are failures in implantology, due to postoperative infection. For this reason, different antibiotic therapy regimens have been included in the treatment; however, their effectiveness in avoiding perioperative and postoperative complications remains controversial. Methods: A search was performed using Epistemonikos, the biggest database for systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening of multiple sources of information, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. Data from systematic reviews were extracted, and analysis of the primary studies was performed, including a meta-analysis and a summary of findings table using GRADE approach. Results and conclusions: We identified 23 systematic reviews that together included 16 primary studies, of which 9 correspond to randomized clinical trials. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis compared to placebo probably reduces implant and prosthetic failure, however, it may make little or no difference in postoperative infections. On the other hand, it is not clear whether antibiotic therapy treatment (perioperative and postoperative) compared to placebo reduces implant failure and postoperative infection, because the certainty of the existing evidence is very low.