Diagnóstico de infecciones asociadas a artroplastias / Recommendations for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections

Resumen La infección de prótesis articulares es la más temida de las complicaciones en estas cirugías. Su diagnóstico continúa siendo un gran desafío, debido a su presentación poco evidente y solapada, exigiendo una alta sospecha clínica para que el mismo pueda ser realizado en forma oportuna. El presente documento representa una revisión actualizada de las evidencias y recomendaciones existentes, con el objeto de proveer una herramienta que permita a los profesionales seguir un curso de acción basado en los conocimientos actuales y recursos disponibles, según la opinión de los miembros de la Comisión de Infecciones Osteoarticulares de la Sociedad Argentina de Infectología (SADI).

Abstract Prosthetic joint infection is the most feared complication of implant surgeries. Its diagnosis continues to be a challenge since its clinical presentation is usually not very evident and overlapping. A high clinical suspicion is needed to make a timely diagnosis. This document represents an updated review of the existing evidence and recommendations, in order to provide a tool that allows professionals to follow a course of action based on current knowledge and available resources, according to the opinion of the members of the Commission of Osteoarticular Infections from the Argentinean Society of Infectious Diseases (SADI).

Mucormicosis asociada a COVID-19. Un caso en Argentina / COVID-19 associated mucormycosis. A case in Argentina

Resumen La enfermedad COVID-19 provocada por el virus SARS-CoV-2 presenta una gravedad variable. Recientemente se ha observado un aumento en el número de casos informados de mucormicosis asociada a COVID-19 (CAM), principalmente en personas con diabetes mellitus, cetoacidosis diabética o en tratamiento con esteroides. El mayor número de casos ha sido notificado en India, en donde la prevalencia de CAM en pacientes hospitalizados en el año 2020 fue de 0.27%, lo que implica un aumento en la prevalencia de mucormicosis de 2.1 veces respecto del año 2019. Si bien el tratamiento con corticoides reduce la mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 grave, su uso prolongado, en combinación con otros factores clínicos e inmunológicos, puede aumentar el riesgo de infección fúngica invasiva. Comunicamos un caso de CAM en Argentina. El presente informe representa una alerta para fundar sospecha de infección fúngica invasiva en pacientes con COVID-19.

Abstract SARS-CoV-2 virus disease presents variable severity. Recently, an increasing report of cases of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) has been observed, mainly in patients with diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis or under steroids treatment. The highest number of cases have been reported in India, with a prevalence of 0.27 % in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during year 2020, which implies a 2.1-fold increase in the prevalence of mucormycosis compared to year 2019. Although corticosteroids treatment reduces mortality in patients with severe COVID-19, its prolonged use, in combination with other clinical and immunological factors, could increase the risk of invasive fungal infection. We report a case of CAM in Argentina. This report represents a warning for considering the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection in patients with severe COVID-19.

Relación entre desarrollo de los programas para la gestión del uso de antimicrobianos, apropiabilidad y consumo de antibióticos en hospitales de Argentina / Relationship between the antimicrobial stewardship program development, appropriateness and antimicrobial consumption in Argentinean hospitals

Introducción: La implementación de Programas para la Optimización de Uso de Antimicrobianos (PROAs) ha resultado una estrategia útil para mejorar los resultados asistenciales, de manera segura y costo-efectiva, reduciendo el desarrollo de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos.Objetivo: Estimar la relación entre nivel de desarrollo de los PROAs, apropia-bilidad y consumo de antimicrobianos en hospitales ArgentinosMaterial y métodos: Entre Jul-2016 y Ene-2017, 111 hospitales condujeron una autoevaluación del nivel de desarrollo de sus PROAs usando un instrumen-to basado en los lineamientos del CDC (0 a 100 puntos), además de un cor-te de prevalencia para evaluar la apropiabilidad de las prescripciones de an-timicrobianos y su consumo mensual [Dosis Diarias Definidas (DDD) c/100 días-paciente]. Para la comparación de estos indicadores, los centros fueron dicotomizados tomando como punto de corte el percentilo 75 (p75) de la au-toevaluación.Resultados: La comparación entre hospitales con puntaje ≥p75 vs.

Objective: To assess the association between the level of AMS programs development, appropriateness and antimicrobial consumption in Argentinean hospitalsMaterial and methods: Between Jul-2016 and Jan-2017, 111 hospitals performed a self-assessment survey of their AMS programs using a standardized tool based on CDC recommendations (0­100 scale). In addition, the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescription was measured through one-day prevalence study using specific criteria. The monthly consumption of a group of antimicrobials was calculated using Defined Daily Doses (DDD) per 100 patient-days. To assess the relationship between the level of AMS programs development and the appropriateness and antimicrobial consumption indicators, participating centers were grouped into two categories by using the 75th percentile (75thp) of the self-assessment scoreResults: Comparison between hospitals with score ≥75thp vs <75thp showed significant differences in all indicators analyzed (self-assessment score: 51.6 vs 25.4; diff. 26.2; 95%CI 30.3 to 22.0, p<0.000; surgical prophylaxis: ≤ 24 hs 64.8% vs 52.3%; diff. 12.5%; 95%CI 5.1% to 20.0%, p<0.002; compliance with guidelines: 77.6% vs 47.0%; diff. 30.6%; 95%CI 28.1% to 33.0%, p<0.000; prospective audit with feedback: 69.4% vs 46.8%; diff. 22.6%; 95%CI 20.0% to 25.2%, p<0.000; antimicrobial consumption: 114.8 DDDs vs 259.2 DDDs; diff.­144.4; 95%CI ­140.6 to ­148.2, p<0.000)Conclusions: Hospitals with higher self-assessment score showed better appropriateness and consumption antimicrobial indicators, reinforcing the relevance of an effective implementation of AMS programs

Recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones asociadas a artoplastia electiva en adultos / Recommendations for prevention of surgical site infection in adult elective arthroplasty

Las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico que complican las cirugías ortopédicas con implante prolongan la estadía hospitalaria y aumentan tanto el riesgo de readmisión como el costo de la internación y la mortalidad. Las presentes recomendaciones están dirigidas a: (i) optimizar el cumplimiento de normas y la incorporación de hábitos en cada una de las fases de la cirugía, detectando factores de riesgo para infecciones del sitio quirúrgico potencialmente corregibles o modificables; y (ii) adecuar la profilaxis antibiótica preoperatoria y el cuidado intra y postoperatorio.

Surgical site infections complicating orthopedic implant surgeries prolong hospital stay and increase risk of readmission, hospitalization costs and mortality. These recommendations are aimed at: (i) optimizing compliance and incorporating habits in all surgery phases by detecting risk factors for surgical site infections which are potentially correctable or modifiable; and (ii) optimizing preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis as well as intraoperative and postoperative care.

Adherence to an occupational blood borne pathogens exposure management program among healthcare workers and other groups at risk in Argentina

We conducted a retrospective review of 130 occupational blood borne pathogens exposure (BBP-OE) records at Centro de Estudios Médicos e Investigaciones Clínicas, a university hospital with an ongoing educational program and a postexposure management program for healthcare workers (HCWs) since 1995, in order to evaluate adherence to a hospital BBP-OE management program. We compared HCWs from our institution (Group 1) and HCWs from independent institutions that contract our postexposure management program (Group 2). Compliance with standard precautions in Group 1 was inadequate in 77 percent, 23 percent, and 16 percent of nurses, physicians, and others, respectively. A greater proportion of HCWs in Group 1 (74 percent vs. 40 percent) reported occupational accidents within two hours after exposure (p = 0.0001). No difference was observed regarding compliance with adherence to schedule, partial adherence, and loss at follow-up (14 percent, 33 percent, and 53 percent; p > 0.05). Adherence to the standard of care for BBP-OE, including postexposure prophylaxis, was low (HIV: 53 percent and HBV: 63 percent). Knowledge of the seropositive status of the source patient did not improve adherence. We conclude that postexposure programs do not guarantee appropriate behavior by HCWs. General interventions and ongoing personnel education to modify individual attitudes are needed, as are continued efforts to assess HCWs' experiences with these programs, as well as the identification of strategies to improve adherence.