RESUMEN
Objective:To explore influence of negative emotions on prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .Methods :Self‐rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self‐rating depression scale (SDS) were used to assess 90 patients undergoing PCI .According to the score results ,patients were divided into pure depression group (n=28 ,occupied 31.11% ) ,pure anxiety group (n=22 ,24.44% ) ,anxiety com‐plicated depression group (n= 25 ,27.78% ) and normal group (n = 15 ) . All patients were followed up for 12 months ,and Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) .Results:Incidence rates of MACE in pure depression group ,pure anxiety group and anxiety complicated depression group were significantly higher than that of normal group (42.86% vs .40.91% vs .64.00% vs .6.67% , P<0.05 or <0.01) ,and that of anxiety complicated depression group was significantly higher than those of pure depression group and pure anxiety group (P<0.05 both) .Logistic regression analysis indicated that anxiety ,depres‐sion ,anxiety complicated depression were risk factors for MACE (OR = 1.49 ,2.16 ,3.28 , P < 0.05 or < 0.01) . Conclusion : Most patients undergoing coronary intervention possesses negative emotions ,which are risk factors for adverse clinical events and affect their prognosis .
RESUMEN
Objective:To explore influence of different guide wire on transradial coronary angiography (CAG). Methods:A total of 238 patients,who received successful transradial CAG in our hospital from Nov 2009 to Jan 2013,were selected.According to kinds of guide wire,they were divided into group A (n=119,used ordinary J type exchange guide wire)and group B (n=119,used loach exchange guide wire.Trafficability,supporting force and incidence rate of complications were compared between above two groups.Results:The trafficability of loach exchange guide wire was significantly better than that of ordinary J type exchange guide wire,the pass rates of elbow joint (98.3% vs.87.4%)and brachiocephalic trunk (100% vs.96.2%)were significantly higher than those of or-dinary J type exchange guide wire (P<0.01 or <0.05).For guide wire support to rotate catheter,ordinary J type exchange guide wire had obvious advantages,its success rate of left CAG (98.3%)was significantly higher than that of loach exchange guide wire (89.1%),P<0.01.There were no significant differences in incidence rate of compli-cations between two groups.Conclusion:Ordinary J type exchange guide wire could be preferred in coronary angiog-raphy,and loach exchange guide wire can be considered if the former can't pass.