Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics ; (6): 177-180, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-463359

RESUMEN

Objective To compare the purification process of two types of ceramic hydroxyapatite(CHT I and CHT II)to remove the aggregates from two monoclonal antibodies(mAb 1 and mAb 2).Methods All the chromatography runs were performed on AKTA AVANT 150 with Tricon 10/50 column.The dynamic binding capacity( DBC) of two types of CHT was studied firstly, and then purification research was carried out selecting the suitable DBC.The column was equilibrated with 5 mmol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate pH 6.5, and then was eluted with gradient buffers which were 10 mmol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate pH 6.5 and 2 mol/L sodium chloride pH 6.5.Aggregate content in loading and elution pool was evaluated by size exclusion chromatography.Scale-up process was carried on 20 cm height chromatography column XK16/40.Results DBC of CHT I for mAb 1 was 40 mg/mL and mAb 2 was 45 mg/mL.After purity, monomer content of mAb 1 reached 98.6% and yield was 92.5% and monomer content of mAb 2 reached 98.8%and yield was 91.5%.DBC of CHT II for mAb1 was 16 mg/mL and mAb 2 was 20 mg/mL.After purity, monomer content of mAb 1 reached 99.8% and yield was 91.8% and monomer content of mAb 2 reached 99.9% and yield was 92.2%.Conclusion Two types of CHT both can remove aggregates effectively from monoclonal antibodies when aggregate content reaches more than 10%, and results conform to the regulations.CHT I has higher dynamic binding capacity than CHT II, and CHT II is superior to CHT I in removing aggregate efficiency.The purification process is simple and can be easily scaled up in pilot and manufacture.Therefore, it meets the requirement pilot and scale production.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA