RESUMEN
Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder and can be defined as lid margin blepharitis accompanied by conjunctivitis and keratopathy.Typical clinical characteristics of BKC consisted of conjunctival hyperemia,papillary hyperplasia follicles,punctate keratitis,marginal keratitis,corneal punctuate epithelial erosion,corneal ulcer,corneal scar and vascularization,corneal perforation.The clinical symptoms and signs of BKC are complicated,which can lead to misdiagnose.The physiotherapy of BKC includes eyelid hygiene,meibomian glands massage and warm compresses;the drug treatment of BKC includes artificial tear,topical antibiotics,corticosteroids,nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),immunosuppressants and so on.Corneal transplantation is required for the severe BKC patients.The etiology,pathogenesis,diagnosis and management of BKC was reviewed in this artcle.
RESUMEN
Objective To analyze the retrieval of master and doctorial dissertations entitledsystematic review/meta analysis in domestic universities of traditional Chinese medicine. Methods Master and doctorial dissertations entitledsystematic review/meta analysis in domestic universities of traditional Chinese medicine retrieved from China Dissertation Full-text Database were analyzed using Excel and SPSS 17. 0,respectively. Results Of the 423 master and doctorial dissertations included in this study,71. 9% were retrieved from both Chinese and English databases, 27. 7% were retrieved from Chinese databases,82. 8% were retrieved from two or more Chinese databases,54. 1% were retrieved from two or more English databases. The most frequently retrieved Chinese database was CKNI, followed by VIP, CBM and Wanfang. The most frequently retrieved English database was PubMed, followed by Cochrane Library, EMBASE and OVID. Conclusion The low use of traditional Chinese medicine databases is the main prob-lem in retrieval of master and doctorial dissertations entitledsystematic review/meta analysis in domestic univer-sities of traditional Chinese medicine. No significant difference is found in retrieved doctorial dissertations and mas-ter dissertations between 211and non-211 universities of traditional Chinese medicine.