RESUMEN
Giant hypertrophy of gastric mucosa is rare and lack of typical clinical manifestations. The main treatment measures were minimally invasive surgery and drug intervention. Clinicians should pay attention to it's imaging features, in order to make early diagnosis and treatment, and obtain a good prognosis. The authors introduce the results of gastro-enterography and computed tomography in a case with giant hypertrophy of gastric mucosa, and differentiate the imaging results from gastric cancer, lymphoma and gastric stromal tumor, so as to provide references for the clinical diagnosis of the disease.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the computed tomography (CT) features of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm (GNEN).Methods:The retrospective and descriptive method was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 30 GNEN patients who were admitted to two domestic medical centers (13 cases in Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and 17 cases in Wenzhou People′s Hospital) from January 2010 to December 2018 were collected. There were 23 males and 7 females, aged (62±4)years, with a range from 27 to 78 years. The patients underwent abdominal CT plain scan and dynamic enhancement scan. Two associate chief radiologists with more than 20 years of work experience observed and analyzed all the images respectively. Observation indicators: (1) CT examination; (2) treatment and postoperative pathological examination; (3) follow-up. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect the survival of patients up to December 2018. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Results:(1) CT examination: of the 30 patients, 14 had the tumor located in the fundus of stomach, 10 had the the tumor located in the body of stomach, and 6 had the tumor located in the antrum. The tumor was elliptical in 18 cases and irregular in 12 cases. There were 15 cases of endogenous type, 13 cases of exogenous type, and 2 cases of intramural type. Patients with G1 neuroendocrine tumor had the maximum diameter of (6.8±1.6)cm, of which 4 cases had the maximum diameter less than 5.0 cm and 4 cases had the maximum diameter of 5.0 to 10.0 cm. Patients with G2 neuroendocrine tumor had the maximum diameter of (8.3±2.7)cm, of which 1 case had the maximum diameter less than 5.0 cm, 4 cases had the maximum diameter of 5.0 to 10.0 cm, and 2 cases had the maximum diameter greater than 10.0 cm. Patients with G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma had the maximum diameter of (17.8±2.2)cm, of which 6 cases had the maximum diameter of 5.0 to 10.0 cm and 9 cases had the maximum diameter more than 10.0 cm. The tumor showed swelling growth in 14 cases and invasive growth in 16 cases. The tumor boundary was clear in 14 cases and unclear in 16 cases. CT plain scan showed homogeneous tumor density in 10 cases and heterogeneous density in 20 cases. Nine patients had iso-density in the tumor parenchymal part, and the CT value was (34.0±3.5)HU. In the 18 cases of low density, the CT value was (16.6±1.4)HU. In the 3 cases of high density, the CT value was (45.3±3.6)HU. Of the 30 patients, 21 cases had small punctate or small round necrotic cyst lesions in the tumor, 10 cases had mesenteric lymph node, peritoneum, liver metastasis and adjacent omentum invasion; 17 cases had abdominal effusion. In the CT enhancement examination, 12 cases showed mild enhancement, and the CT value was (56.5±6.3)HU; 15 cases showed moderate enhancement, and the CT value was (66.0±5.4)HU; 3 cases showed significant enhancement, and the CT value was (76.6±5.8)HU. Seven cases showed homogeneous enhancement and 23 cases had heterogeneous enhancement. There were 8 cases with tortuous vessels. (2) Treatment and postoperative pathological examination: of the 30 patients, 10 cases with mesenteric lymph nodes, peritoneum, liver metastasis and adjacent omentum invasion underwent radical total gastrectomy; 14 cases without surrounding tissue invasion or metastasis underwent radical subtotal gastrectomy; 6 cases with tumor diameter less than 4.0 cm and without surrounding tissue invasion or metastasis underwent endoscopic resection. All the 30 patients were confirmed GNEN by postoperative pathological examination, including 8 cases of G1 neuroendocrine tumor, 7 cases of G2 neuroendocrine tumor, and 15 cases of G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma. Results of immunohistochemical staining showed that 30 patients were positive for synaptophysin, 23 were positive for chromogranin A, and 9 were positive for cytokeratin. (3) Follow-up: all the 30 patients were followed up for 10-80 months, with a median follow-up time of 39 months. The 5-year survival rate of 30 patients was 43.3% (13/30). The 5-year survival rates were 6/8, 3/7 and 4/15 of patients with G1 neuroendocrine tumor, G2 neuroendocrine carcinoma, and G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma.Conclusions:GNEN has the main manifestation as abdominal pain, with G3 as pathological classification, which is common in fundus and body of stomach. The CT findings of GNEN are characterized by swelling or infiltrating growth and round or irregular low-density masses. Tumors are prone to cystic transformation, and showed the mildly to moderately heterogeneous enhancement.
RESUMEN
Objective To make a systematical review of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation versus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. Methods We electronically searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2016), CNKI, WanFang Data and from Jan., 1980, to Mar., 2015, collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EVL versus EVS for the patients of esophageal variceal bleeding. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 24 studies including 2020 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, there were no signiifcant differences in the variceal eradication rate (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.09, P=0.090) between the EVL group and the EVS group; Compared with the EVS group, the EVL group could significantly reduce the rate of variceal rebleeding (RR=0.69, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.81, P=0.000), the rate of mortality (RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.63 to 0.90, P=0.002) and the rate of complication (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.63, P=0.000), but the rate of variceal recurrent rate of EVS group was lower than that of the EVL group (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.01,P=0.000). Conclusion Current evidence shows that, the variceal eradication rate between EVL and EVS is similar, but the EVL has less incidence of variceal rebleeding and mortality and complication.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare of clinical and pathological features between gastric polyps and colorectal polyps.Methods The clinical characteristics and pathological features of 2 125 patients with gastric polyps and 4 924 patients with colorectal polyps admitted in Wenzhou People's Hospital from 2004 to 2013 were compared.The detection rates,the indication of endoscopy,distribution,number,size and pathological type of gastric polyps and colorectal polyps were analyzed.Results The detection rate of gastric polyps was 3.1％ (2 125/69 575) and that of colorectal polyps was 24.5％ (4 924/20 124) (χ2 =9 886.401,P ＜0.01).The detection rates of gastric polyps in age groups ＜ 20,20-39,40-59 and ≥60 were 1.8％ (23/1 302),1.8％ (399/22 600),3.4％ (1 137/33 087) and 4.5％ (566/12 586),respectively (χ2 =238.867,P ＜ 0.01);and those for colorectal polyps were 6.6％ (14/211),11.6％ (623/5 385),26.0％ (2 622/10 070) and 37.3％ (1 665/4 458),respectively (χ2 =934.724,P ＜ 0.01).The detection rates of gastric polyps in age groups 20-39,40-59 and ≥60 were lower than those in colorectal polyps(all P ＜ 0.01).The detection rate of gastric polyps in males was lower than that in females(2.3％,848/36 447 vs.3.9％,1 277/33 128,χ2 =273.807,P ＜0.01),while the detection rate of colorectal polyps in males was higher than that in females (28.8％,3 239/11 230 vs.18.9％,1 685/8 894,χ2 =262.518,P ＜ 0.01).Diarrhea and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with colorectal polyps was more common than those in patients with gastric polyps (23.5％,1 156/4 924 vs.2.5％,54/2 125,χ2 =558.080,P＜0.01;12.1％,597/4 924 vs.2.4％,51/2 125,χ2 =168.150,P ＜0.01).Single polyps were more common in gastric polyps than colorectal polyps(80.7％,1 714/2 125 vs.67.6％,3 331/ 4 924,χ2 =186.337,P ＜0.01).Polyps with size ≥ 1.0 cm were more common in colorectal polyps than those in gastric polyps (24.3％,1 197/4 924 vs.13.6％,289/2 125,χ2 =102.333,P ＜ 0.01).The proportion of inflammatory and hyperplastic types in gastric polyps was higher than that in colorectal polyps (67.1％,1 378/2 125 vs.27.5％,1 273/4 924,χ2 =934.394,P ＜0.01;26.9％,552/2 125 vs.9.9％,459/4 924,χ2 =319.588,P ＜0.01);while the proportion of adenoma and canceration in gastric polyps was lower than that in colorectal polyps (1.7％,34/2 125 vs.62.4％,2 893/4 924,χ2 =2 135.743,P ＜0.01;0.4％,9/2 125 vs.4.8％,221/4924,χ2 =80.362,P＜0.01).Conclusions In comparison with gastric polyps,the detection rate of colorectal polyps is higher.The detection rate of gastric polyps is higher in females,w hile that of colorectal polyps is higher in males.The detection rates of gastric polyps andcolorectal polyps increase with the age.The main pathological type of gastric polyps is inflammatory,while that of colorectal polyps is adenoma.The canceration of colorectal polyps is more common than that of gastric polyps.