Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) ; (12): 791-793, 2011.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-814506

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE@#To review the technical details of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and evaluate the clinical effect.@*METHODS@#Between June 2004 and December 2008, 69 patients (55 males and 14 females) with upper ureteral calculus received retroperitoneal laparoseopic ureterolithotomy (40 left sides and 29 right sides). The stone size ranged from 1.5 to 3.1 cm [(2.2±0.6) cm].@*RESULTS@#All the patients underwent retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy. The operation time was 40-295 (63.1±19.8) min,and the blood loss was 30-150 (57.2±23.0) mL.The hospital stay was 5-8 (6.7±1.3) d. During the followup, there was neither ureteral stricture nor recurrent calculus.@*CONCLUSION@#Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy is safe, effective and minimally invasive, which may replace the conventional open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Estudios de Seguimiento , Laparoscopía , Métodos , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Uréter , Cirugía General , Cálculos Ureterales , Cirugía General , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Métodos
2.
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) ; (12): 634-637, 2009.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-406291

RESUMEN

Objective To observe the effect of extraeorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on residual stones after different methods of surgery. Methods Clinical resources of 100 patients with residual stones after different methods of surgery treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from May 2006 to May 2008 were retrospeetively studied. Of the 100 patients, ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy was used for 15 patients (Group Ⅰ) , ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy was used for 25 (Group Ⅱ), mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) with holmium laser for 11 (Group Ⅲ), mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) with airpressure path lithotripterfor 12 (Group Ⅳ) , open surgery for the other 37 (Group Ⅴ). Results About 94% of the residual stones were shattered, and 86 % of the residual stones were cleared successfully. The clearance rate of residual stones from Group Ⅰ to Ⅴ was 100% , 100% , 81.8% , 83.3% , and 73.0% , respectively. The clearance rate of residual stones in Group Ⅰ + Ⅱ was higher than that of Group Ⅲ + Ⅳ and Group V (P<0.05). Conclusion Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is good for the treatmentof residual stones after different methods of surgery, especially the management of residual stones after trans-urethral ureteroscope technique.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA