Analysis of the factors related to glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes without albuminuria / 南方医科大学学报

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the risk factors affecting the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetic patients without albuminuria.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 131 type 2 diabetic patients with normal urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) were divided into normal GFR group and decreased GFR group. The factors relevant to GFR were analyzed by multiple factors regression.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Age, course of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, prevalence of hypertension, the level of serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and uric acid (UA) were significantly higher in decreased GFR group than in normal GFR group. Multivariate regression showed that SCr, age, systolic blood pressure, and UA were negatively correlated to GFR.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Reduced GFR occurs in some type 2 diabetic patients without albuminuria. SCr, age, systolic blood pressure and UA are the major factors related to decreased GFR. The degree of early renal damage in diabetic patients can be better evaluated by combining GFR and UAER.</p>

Association of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c control with the complications in type 2 diabetic patients / 南方医科大学学报

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the status of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (GHbA(1c)) control in type 2 diabetic patients and its relation to diabetic complications.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 676 patients with type 2 diabetes were investigated for GHbA(1c) level and the diabetic complications. The patients were divided into two groups with GHbA(1c) >7% and GHbA(1c)< or =7%, and the relation of GHbA(1c) with the complications was analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The rate of good GHbA(1c) control (GHbA(1c)< or =7%) was 35.1% (237/676) in these patients, and 64.9% (439/676) of the patients showed poor GHbA(1c) control (GHbA(1c)>7%). The rates of hypertension and cerebralovascular complications were significantly higher in patients with GHbA(1c)>7% than in those with GHbA(1c)< or =7% (69.9% vs 55.7%, and 21.8% vs 8.9%, respectively, P<0.001), but the rate of coronary heart disease was comparable between the two groups (18.7% vs 17.3%, P>0.05). The patients with poor GHbA(1c) control had significantly higher incidences of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and fatty liver than those with good GHbA(1c) control (46.0% vs 35.0%, and 36.9% vs 25.3%, respectively, P<0.01), but no significant differences were found in the incidences of diabetic nephropathy (18.7% vs 16.5%), diabetic retinopathy (30.8% vs 27.4%) or diabetic feet (5.0% vs 3.8%) between the two groups (P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Type 2 diabetic patients have generally low rate of successful GHbA(1c) control, which can be associated with the occurrence of diabetic complications, suggesting the necessity of more rigorous diabetic health education and GHbA(1c) monitoring in these patients.</p>