RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the risk factors of perioperative heart failure in the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture treated with hip joint replacement so as to provide relevant clinical reference.Methods A retrospective case control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 155 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent total hip or hemiarthroplasty in Wenzhou Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital from May 2012 to August 2016.There were 62 males and 93 females,aged (75.6 ± 7.4)years.The patients were divided into heart failure group (26 patients)and non heart failure group (129 patients).Heart failure group included 10 males and 16 females,aged (78.3 ± 8.2)years.There were 52 males and 77 females in the non heart failure group,aged (74.5 ±6.7) years.Information including age,gender,history of hypertension,history of heart diseases,American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification,duration from injury to surgery,preoperative renal function,perioperative fluid balance,operation method,operation time,postoperative pain score,perioperative blood loss,and constipation were collected.Univariate analysis was firstly performed on the above data,and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted on the significant factors generated by the univariate analysis so as to identify independent risk factors for perioperative heart failure.Results According to the univariate analysis,age,history of heart diseases,preoperative renal function,and perioperative fluid balance were statistically different between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Multivariate analysis results showed that the independent risk factors of perioperative heart failure included age (OR =5.351,95％ CI 1.459-19.623,P ＜ 0.01),history of heart diseases (OR =5.717,95 ％ CI 2.399-13.624,P ＜ 0.01),preoperative renal function (OR =2.670,95％ CI 1.125-6.336,P ＜ 0.05),perioperative fluid balance (OR =2.980,95％ CI 1.287-6.899,P ＜0.01).Conclusions Age,history of heart diseases,preoperative renal function,and perioperative fluid balance are the risk factors of perioperative heart failure in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.Therefore,more attention should be paid to these risk factors and corresponding preventative measures should be taken to reduce the incidence of perioperative heart failure.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To observe the analgesic and sedative effect and safety of application of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil in dressing change of conscious patients with non-intubation in burn intensive care unit.@*Methods@#Forty patients conforming to the study criteria hospitalized in our burn intensive care unit from April 2015 to April 2017 were selected. Prospective, randomized, and double-blind method was used for the design. Patients were divided into dexmedetomidine group and dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group according to the random number table, with 20 cases in each group. Patients in the two groups were respectively given corresponding drugs during dressing change. The frequency and time of dressing change, Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) score of patients during dressing change (at drug administration for 25 minutes) and after dressing change (25 min after dressing change), Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) during dressing change, satisfaction level for anesthesia of the patients and physicians after dressing change, dosage of remifentanil, and various adverse effects during and after dressing change were recorded. The heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), respiratory rate, and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) before drug administration and at 10, 15, and 25 minutes after drug administration were also recorded. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test, chi-square test, and Fisher′s exact probability test.@*Results@#(1) Totally 38 patients completed the trial. There were no statistically significant differences between patients in two groups in gender, American Association of Anesthesiologist Grading, age, weight, and total burn area (χ2=0.230, 0.146, t=0.224, 0.351, 0.367, P>0.05). (2) The frequency of dressing change of patients in two groups were both 48 times. The time of dressing change and VRS scores during dressing change of patients in two groups were similar (t=0.821, 1.522, P>0.05). The VRS score of patients in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group after dressing change was (3.1±0.4) points, obviously lower than (3.8±0.8) points in remifentanil group (t=2.213, P<0.05). The RSS, satisfaction level scores for anesthesia of the patients and physicians after dressing change in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group were (3.13±0.32), (3.44±0.41), and (3.13±0.25) points, respectively, obviously better than (1.82±0.24), (2.71±0.23), (2.53±0.41) points in remifentanil group (t=2.226, 2.684, 7.702, P<0.01). The dosage of remifentanil of patients in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group was (282±19) μg, obviously less than (340±31) μg in remifentanil group (t=9.896, P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between patients in two groups in rates of respiratory inhibition and hypotension (χ2=0.211, 0.154, P>0.05). Compared with those in remifentanil group, the rates of nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal symptoms of patients in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group were obviously reduced (P<0.05), but the rate of bradycardia was obviously increased (χ2=6.008, P<0.05). (3) There were no statistically significant differences between patients in two groups in heart rate, MAP, respiratory frequency, and SpO2 before drug administration (t=0.444, 0.892, 1.059, 1.039, P>0.05). The heart rates of patients in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group at 10, 15, and 25 minutes after drug administration were (83±11), (78±10), and (82±14) times per minute, respectively, significantly lower than (95±10), (87±12), and (89±12) times per minute in remifentanil group (t=5.592, 3.992, 2.630, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The MAP of patients in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group at 15 and 25 minutes after drug administration were (69.4±3.1) and (73.8±2.2) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), respectively, significantly lower than (75.4±3.0) and (78.1±3.5) mmHg in remifentanil group (t=9.181, 7.206, P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between patients in two groups in respiratory frequency at each time point after drug administration (t=1.489, 1.862, 1.963, P>0.05). The SpO2 of patients in dexmedetomidine+ remifentanil group at 15 minutes after drug administration was 0.972±0.018, obviously lower than 0.979±0.015 in remifentanil group (t=2.070, P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#Application of remifentanil with small dosage has effective analgesia for conscious burn patients with non-intubation during dressing changes, however, adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting are likely to occur. Remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine not only guarantee the analgesic effect, but also reduce the dosage of analgesics, improve the sedative effect and satisfaction of the patients for anesthesia, and reduce various adverse effects. However, it will increase the incidence of bradycardia and has some inhibition effect on circulation at the same time.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To observe the effects of arnebia root oil on wound healing of rats with full-thickness skin defect, and to explore the related mechanism.@*Methods@#Eighty SD rats were divided into arnebia root oil group and control group according to the random number table, with 40 rats in each group, then full-thickness skin wounds with area of 3 cm×3 cm were inflicted on the back of each rat. Wounds of rats in arnebia root oil group and control group were treated with sterile medical gauze and bandage package infiltrated with arnebia root oil gauze or Vaseline gauze, respectively, with dressing change of once every two days. On post injury day (PID) 3, 7, 14, and 21, 10 rats in each group were sacrificed respectively for general observation and calculation of wound healing rate. The tissue samples of unhealed wound were collected for observation of histomorphological change with HE staining, observation of expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) with immunohistochemical staining, and determination of mRNA expressions of VEGF and bFGF with real time fluorescent quantitive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Data were processed with analysis of variance of factorial design, t test, and Bonferroni correction.@*Results@#(1) On PID 3, there were a few secretions in wounds of rats in the two groups. On PID 7, there were fewer secretions and more granulation tissue in wounds of rats in arnebia root oil group, while there were more secretions and less granulation tissue in wounds of rats in control group. On PID 14, most of the wounds of rats in arnebia root oil group were healed and there was much red granulation tissue in unhealed wounds, while part of wounds of rats in control group was healed and there were a few secretions and less granulation tissue in unhealed wounds. On PID 21, wounds of rats in arnebia root oil group were basically healed, while there were still some unhealed wounds of rats in control group. (2) On PID 3 and 7, the wound healing rates of rats in arnebia root oil group were (39±5)% and (46±4)% respectively, which were close to (34±3)% and (44±4)% of rats in control group (with t values respectively 0.807 and 0.481, P values above 0.05). On PID 14 and 21, the wound healing rates of rats in arnebia root oil group were (76±4)% and (90±3)% respectively, which were significantly higher than (60±6)% and (73±5)% of rats in control group (with t values respectively 2.308 and 3.072, P<0.05 or P<0.01). (3) On PID 3, 7, and 14, granulation tissue, fibroblasts, and nascent capillaries in unhealed wound tissue of rats in the two groups both gradually increased, and more ranulation tissue, fibroblasts, and nascent capillaries were seen in unhealed wound tissue of rats in arnebia root oil group. On PID 21, granulation tissue, fibroblasts, and nascent capillaries in unhealed wound tissue of rats in the two groups both gradually decreased. (4) On PID 3, 7, and 14, the numbers of VEGF positive cells and bFGF positive cells in unhealed wound tissue of rats in the two groups both gradually increased; there were more VEGF positive cells and bFGF positive cells in unhealed wound tissue of rats in arnebia root oil group than those in control group. On PID 21, positive expressions of VEGF and bFGF both decreased in unhealed wound tissue of rats in the two groups. (5) On PID 3, 7, and 14, mRNA expressions of VEGF in unhealed wound tissue of rats in arnebia root oil group were higher than those of control group (with t values from 2.967 to 4.173, P values below 0.01). On PID 21, mRNA expression of VEGF in unhealed wound tissue of rats in arnebia root oil group was lower than that of control group (t=-4.786, P<0.001). From PID 3 to 21, mRNA expressions of bFGF in unhealed wound tissue of rats in arnebia root oil group were higher than those of control group (with t values from 2.326 to 4.702, P<0.05 or P<0.01).@*Conclusions@#Arnebia root oil can promote wound healing of rats with full-thickness skin defect, which may relate to increasing expressions of VEGF and bFGF.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the short and long-term effects of different approaches in the treatment of distal tibia post-pilon fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out in 29 patients with distal tibia post-pilon fractures. They were divided into group A ( postmedial approach, n =16 ) and group B ( anterolateral approach,n=13) according to different operative approaches. The length of stay,healing time,postoperative complica-tions and excellent and good rate of hip functional recovery in the two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in length of stay and bone healing time between the two groups(all P>0. 05). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of postoperative complication between the two groups(6. 3% vs. 23. 1%,χ2 =1. 708,P>0. 05),but the incidence rate of partial necrosis in incision corner of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(0. 0% vs. 23. 1%,χ2 =4. 118,P<0. 05). There was no significant difference in excellent and good rate of hip functional recovery between group A(93. 8%) and group B(76. 9%) (χ2 =1. 708,P >0. 05). Conclusion Posterior approach can fully expose the field of operation with good reduction effect,provide possible for anatomical reduction of ankle mortise,good long-term efficacy can be obtained through stable fixation and postopera-tive early hip functional rehabilitation training,can be used as great reference,but need to grasp the indications.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the short and long-term effects of different approaches in the treatment of distal tibia post-pilon fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out in 29 patients with distal tibia post-pilon fractures. They were divided into group A ( postmedial approach, n =16 ) and group B ( anterolateral approach,n=13) according to different operative approaches. The length of stay,healing time,postoperative complica-tions and excellent and good rate of hip functional recovery in the two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in length of stay and bone healing time between the two groups(all P>0. 05). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of postoperative complication between the two groups(6. 3% vs. 23. 1%,χ2 =1. 708,P>0. 05),but the incidence rate of partial necrosis in incision corner of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(0. 0% vs. 23. 1%,χ2 =4. 118,P<0. 05). There was no significant difference in excellent and good rate of hip functional recovery between group A(93. 8%) and group B(76. 9%) (χ2 =1. 708,P >0. 05). Conclusion Posterior approach can fully expose the field of operation with good reduction effect,provide possible for anatomical reduction of ankle mortise,good long-term efficacy can be obtained through stable fixation and postopera-tive early hip functional rehabilitation training,can be used as great reference,but need to grasp the indications.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the clinical effect for treatment of scapula neck or body fractures by straight incision approach and the Judet approach.Methods From July 2001 to July 2011,32 patients with scapula neck or body fractures were treated using the two different approaches:(1) the straight incision approach in 15 patients including 11 males and 4 females,the average age of 38.10 years,fractures classified by Ada-Miller including 4 ⅡA,6 ⅡB and 5 Ⅳ; (2) the Judet approach in 17 patients including 12 males and 5 females,the average age of 39.47 years,fractures classified by Ada-Miller including 5 ⅡA,4 ⅡB and 8 Ⅳ.All patients were followed up.Intraoperative data and postoperative pain of two groups were compared by visual analogue score (VAS),the efficacy were evaluated by Rowe-Zarins scores and the patient's postoperative shoulder function were assessed by Constant-Murley functional score.Results All fractures were preliminary healed after 8 weeks of surgery,there was no wound infection,no internal fixation loosening,no shoulder deformity and other complication.Length of incision,operative time and blood loss of straight incision approach was 6.73±0.96 cm,58.67±4.39 min,94.25±6.14 ml and length of incision,operative time and blood loss of Judet approach was 18.88±1.41 cm,82.24±4.49 min,227.77±23.08 ml.VAS of straight incision approach and Judet approach were 2.60±1.55 and 4.65±1.93,mild and moderate postoperative pain evaluated by VAS were significant differences between two groups.The excellent rate by Rowe-Zarins scores of straight incision approach and Judet approach were 93.3％(14/15) and 88.2％(15/17),they were no significant differences.There was no significant differences in the shoulder joint mobility and muscle strength of Constant-Murley functional score between two groups.However,pain and daily life of Constant-Murley functional score were significant differences between two groups and Constant-Murley functional score of straight incision approach and Judet approach were 85.60±3.31 and 80.65±3.44.Conclusion Compared with Judet approach,straight in cision approach has many advantages,such as a short time of surgery,minor injury,light postoperative pain,good postoperative functional recovery.It is the better surgical approach for the treatment of scapular fractures.