A Prospective Study of Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsy in Patients with High Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen with Consideration of Prostatic Inflammation

PURPOSE: We aimed to reduce unnecessary prostatic biopsy in patients with high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) by consideration of prostatic inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigation was conducted prospectively in 413 patients with a PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/ml from January 2004 to December 2009. All patients underwent the expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) or voided bladder urine 3 (VB3) test to be classified into two groups: positive group and negative group. Patients with a positive result on the EPS or VB3 test were treated with antibiotics for 2 months, and in cases in which the PSA level remained high, we performed prostate biopsy. In patients with a negative result on the VB3 test, we performed prostate biopsy directly. RESULTS: Of the 413 study patients, 215 (52%) patients had positive findings on the EPS or VB3 test. After 8 weeks of antibiotics therapy, 53 of the 215 men avoided prostate biopsy because their PSA level was normalized. The other patients (162 of 215) still had elevated PSA levels of more than 4 ng/ml, including 7 patients in whom the biopsy revealed cancer. Patients with negative findings (198 of 413) underwent prostate biopsy. Of the 198 patients, 41 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The total prostate cancer detection rate was 11.6% in our subjects, where as it was 20.7% in the patients with negative findings on the EPS or VB3 and 3.3% in the patients with positive findings, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In cases in which the PSA level is increasing, if we first exclude prostatitis and carry out a serial diagnostic procedure, it may help to reduce unnecessary prostatic biopsy.

The Different Reduction Rate of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Dutasteride and Finasteride

PURPOSE: To compare and analyze the therapeutic effects and changes in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level with treatment with finasteride or dutasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for 1 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients who suffered from BPH for 1 year between January 2005 and December 2008. For treatment groups, we divided the patients into two groups: one was treated with alfuzosin and finasteride and the other was treated with alfuzosin and dutasteride. At the beginning of treatment, the patients underwent transrectal ultrasonography and measurement of urine flow rate, residual urine volume, PSA, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Patients with diseases affecting urinary function were excluded. We not only analyzed the data at the time of initial treatment, but also after 1 year of treatment. A total of 219 patients were able to be evaluated for 1 year. RESULTS: Both finasteride and dutasteride reduced PSA and prostate volume significantly. The comparison between groups showed a more significant reduction of PSA (p=0.020) and prostate volume (p=0.052) in the dutasteride group. Other parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: 5-alpha Reductase inhibitors for BPH treatment reduced PSA and prostate volume significantly when the patients were treated for 1 year. Administration of dutasteride is considered to be more effective in reducing PSA and prostate volume. Therefore, dutasteride should not be considered equivalent to finasteride in the reduction rate of PSA. The intensity of dutasteride must be reevaluated in comparison with finasteride.