RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We studied to evaluate the risk of infectious keratitis in therapeutic contact lens wearer following PRK. METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 normal subjects were applied the therapeutic contact lens after PRK during corneal epithelium regeneration period and all patients used ofloxacin eye drops. After 3 to 5 days the therapeutic contact lenses were removed aseptically and we inoculated them into culture media. RESULTS: The number of culture positive contact lens was 15 (37.5%) and the number of identified organism was 17, because mixed culture (bacteria and fungus) was detected in two lens culture sets. In the 17 positive culture sets, CNS (Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus) was positive in 7 cases (41.2%), P. acnes in 3 cases (17.6%) and even pseudomonas species were positive in 2 cases (11.8%), but there was no infectious keratitis. Fungus was also detected in 4 culture sets. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that the risk of infectious keratitis in therapeutic lens wearer after PRK is still high as in extended lens wearers. So, close follow-up for contact lens-related keratitis after PRK is essential despite of the use of antibiotic solution.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Vendajes , Lentes de Contacto , Medios de Cultivo , Epitelio Corneal , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hongos , Queratitis , Ofloxacino , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Queratectomía Fotorrefractiva , Pseudomonas , RegeneraciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate error of corneal thickness measurement in different gazes in Orbscan topography. METHODS: Sixty eyes of 30 normal subjects were investigated using the Orbscan topography system. The central corneal thickness (Kc) and the thinnest corneal thickness (Kt) on topography map were obtained in 5 different gazes. Gaze directions were classified into center (C), nasal I (NI), nasal II (NII), temporal I (TI), and temporal II (TII), in which I means 13 degree deviation from visual axis and II means 22 degree deviation. RESULTS: Kc in right eye was 540.4+/-37.7 micro meter(mean+/-standard deviation) at central gaze (C) and 550+/-36.9 micro meter at NI ; there was no significant change, but there were in Kc at NII (563.0+/-40.5 micro meter), TI (566.5+/-32.8 micro meter), TII (595.2+/-54.5 micro meter). In addition, the same patterns were seen in left eye in Kc analysis. In contrast, Kt did not change even in 5 gaze changes. In comparison between Kc and Kt at the same gazes, there were significant differences except in central gaze (C). CONCLUSIONS: Though the gaze direction changed, the most reliable measurement for evaluation and follow up of corneal thickness is the thinnest corneal thickness (Kc) in Orbscan topography system. In case that the central corneal refractive power and thickness were needed, it is important that Orbscan topography is performed in exact central fixation.