A Case of an Asymptomatic Intralenticular Foreign Body

The purpose of this article is to report a case of an asymptomatic intralenticular metallic foreign body that was retained for 6 months. A 66-year-old male visited our ophthalmology department because of decreased visual acuity in his left eye 6 months after he suffered ocular trauma while mowing. He had not been treated because he did not experience any discomfort. His corrected visual acuity was 0.4. Central corneal opacity, an intralenticular metallic foreign body, and an intact posterior capsule were observed on slit lamp examination. Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation and simultaneous removal of the intralenticular foreign body was performed. Seventeen days after the operation, his corrected visual acuity was 1.0, the intraocular lens was well-seated, and there was no intraocular inflammation. In this case report, a patient was found to have an intralenticular metallic foreign body retained for 6 months. During this time he did not experience any ocular dysfunction due to the foreign body. Mowing accidents are common in Korea. Despite the absence of symptoms, patients reporting a history of lawn mowing should be thoroughly examined.

Comparison of Effects of IVTA and Photocoagulation, Depending on Types of Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of IVTA with focal laser photocoagulation, for cystoid macular edema and sponge-like macular edema categorized by findings of optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This study comprised 104 eyes of diabetic macular edema. OCT findings were used to divide the eyes into one group with sponge-like macular edema, and one group with cystoid macular edema. Each group was then divided into two subgroups, one with eyes treated with IVTA, and the other with eyes treated with laser photocoagulation. Visual acuity and macular thickness were compared between the subgroups at 1, 2, and 3 months after therapy. RESULTS: Regardless of the type of macular edema, the group treated with IVTA showed a more rapid improvement of visual acuity (P0.05), but patients who definetely had focal leakage showed better improvement and consistency of visual acuity when treated with focal laser photocoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: The correct therapeutic method, depending on the type of macular edema, grouped by OCT and FAG, should result in better improvement of visual acuity. Further study is needed to determine the optimal combination therapy depending on the type of macular edema.