RESUMEN
【Objective】 To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic bladder muscle flap ureteroplasty in the treatment of long-segment injury in the middle and lower ureter and to summarize the clinical experience. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 6 patients treated in our hospital during Oct.2018 and Aug.2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Four of them had long-segment ureteral mucosal cuff-like avulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy and could not undergo end-to-end ureteral anastomosis or reimplantation, and then laparoscopic bladder muscle flap ureteroplasty plus lumbaris major fixation of the bladder was performed immediately. The other 2 patients had to undergo this procedure due to stricture. 【Results】 All operations were successful. The median ureteral avulsion or ureteral stricture length was 14.5(6, 16) cm, muscle flap length 16.5(8,18) cm, operation time 190 (160, 240) min, blood loss 175 (100, 250) mL, postoperative hospital stay 8 (7, 12) days, and postoperative creatinine (89.38±21.74) μmoI/L. No major complications occurred. One patient developed urinary leakage, which returned to normal after active glycemic control and nutritional therapy; one patient developed postoperative absorption fever, which recovered after physical cooling. During the follow-up of 6 to 45 months, CT showed mild hydronephrosis in some patients, but no ureteral stenosis, impaired renal function or other complications, and patients complained no subjective discomfort. 【Conclusion】 Laparoscopic bladder muscle flap ureteroplasty is safe and effective for patients with long-segment injury in the middle and lower ureter. It has the advantages of small trauma, few long-term complications, and rapid recovery and improvement of renal function. If necessary, it can be combined with lumbaris major fixation of the bladder to shorten the distance from the muscle flap to the broken end of the ureter and to reduce the tension of the anastomosis.
RESUMEN
【Objective】 To compare the efficacy, safety and survival of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in the treatment of clinical T1b and T2a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). 【Methods】 A total of 115 patients with stage T1b and T2a RCC treated during Apr.2014 and Jul.2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into PN group (n=55) and RN group (n=60). The clinical data and prognosis of the two groups were compared. 【Results】 There were no significant differences in the general clinical data and perioperative related factors between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in PN group than in RN group (P=0.024), but there was no significant difference in serious complications (Clavien grade ≥3) (P>0.05). In terms of renal function recovery, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine between the two groups before operation (P>0.05), but the serum creatinine was significantly lower in PN group than in RN group on the 1st day, 3rd, 6th and 12th months after operation (P0.05). 【Conclusion】 Both PN and RN are safe and effective in the treatment of stage T1b and T2a RCC, and can achieve good oncological control effects. Compared with RN, PN can fully and effectively protect the postoperative renal function, but it causes more surgical complications. However, there is no significant difference in severe complications (Clavien grade ≥3).