Comparison of the effects of recombinant human endostatin and docetaxel on human umbilical vein endothelial cells in different growth states / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin, Endostar) has been proved to be an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Docetaxel has been also considered as a common chemotherapeutic agent with inhibition of angiogenesis of malignancies. However, their function has been seldom compared and a best synergism protocol is not determined. This study aimed to compare the effects of two drugs, investigate their combined impact on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), a molecular basis and find ideal protocols to inhibit endothelial cell proliferation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>HUVECs on confluent growth or activated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were treated by rh-endostatin or/and docetaxel at respective gradient concentration in following operations as cell proliferation determined by MTT assay, cell cycle distribution, apoptosis and markers of CD146, CD62E and CD105 detected by flow cytometery, the structure of the channel formed by HUVECs measured by tube formation count.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Rh-endostatin exhibited time dependent inhibition of proliferation while docetaxel showed both time and dose dependent inhibition. HUVECs accumulated in G(0)-G(1) with decreased numbers of cells in G(2) after a single treatment of rh-endostatin or that followed by docetaxel treatment. Cells accumulated in G(2) after both a single docetaxel and simultaneous administration. Both the number of cells in G(0)-G(1) and apoptotic cells were increased by docetaxel followed by rh-endostatin treatment. The number of non-apoptotic cells at G(0)-G(1) was increased by first administering rh-endostatin then docetaxel. Sequential treatment of docetaxel followed by rh-endostatin resulted in the greatest increase in apoptosis (34.7%) and the second highest apoptosis was seen with simultaneous administration (18.2%). Expression of CD146 and CD105 on confluent HUVECs was reduced at certain doses of rh-endostatin and/or docetaxel. However, rh-endostatin reduced CD105 without any apparent impact on either CD146 or CD62E expression, whereas these markers were down-regulated by docetaxel after pre-activation by VEGF. Rh-endostatin treatment maintained tube-like structures for a limited time. In contrast, docetaxel swiftly reduced tube formation. Simultaneous treatment, or docetaxel followed by rh-endostatin, exhibited a stronger inhibition on tube formation than either agent alone.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Both rh-endostatin and docetaxel can inhibit HUVEC proliferation while the high apoptotic rate after combined administration was probably owing to different sequent administration by docetaxel followed by rh-endostatin or simultaneous treatment. Both proliferation and adhesion molecules on HUVECs of confluent growth are down-regulated by the two drugs. The rh-endostatin decreased proliferation markers, but only slightly modified adhesion molecules, while both markers were down-regulated by docetaxel on HUVECs activated by VEGF. Rh-endostatin could maintain adhesion of HUVECs at first then induce cells apoptosis to damage tube formation. We hypothesize that it could lead to vascular normalization in short time. In contrast, docetaxel can suppress HUVEC proliferation, adhesion, and reduced tube formation swiftly due to its cytotoxicity. Combined treatments can induce a synergistic inhibition of tube formation.</p>

Efficacy of endostar combined with chemotherapy in multi-cycle treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the correlation between long term efficacy/safety and treatment cycles of rh-endostatin (endostar) combined with TP (paclitaxel plus cisplatin/carboplatin) or NP (navelbine plus cisplatin/carboplatin) regimens in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twenty-five patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed by histopathology and/or cytology were enrolled in this study. Twenty-one patients underwent endostar combined with NP regimen and other four patients underwent endostar combined with TP regimen (all repeated 21 days) treatment. The therapeutic effects, quality of life (QOL) and adverse effects were evaluated according to RECIST criteria, Karnofsky performance scores and WHO grading of adverse effects, respectively. Our intention was to make knowledge of the therapeutic effects, median time to progression, one-year survival rate, median overall survival and adverse reactions. The amount of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in peripheral blood was measured by flow cytometry.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the 25 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. They were comprised of 5 cases of PR, 14 cases of SD and 6 cases of PD. Of the 25 cases, RR was obtained in 5 cases (20.0%), CBR in 19 cases (76.0%), mTTP was 8 months and mOS was 19 months. Of the 14 patients with short treatment cycles (< 4), PR was obtained in 2 cases, SD in 6 cases and PD in 6 cases, RR was 14.3%. Of the 8 patients who obtained PR or SD, the median TTP was 6 months and median overall survival was 18 months. Of the 11 patients with long treatment cycles (≥ 4), PR was obtained in 3 cases, SD in 8 cases, RR was 27.3%, mTTP was 17 months and mOS was 26 months. After treatment, the amount of activated CECs was increased by (293 ± 12)/10(5) in patients with short treatment cycles, and decreased by (243 ± 181)/10(5) in patients with long treatment cycles. A positive correlation was found between the changes of activated CECs after therapy, time to progression (TTP) and treatment cycles (r = 0.970, P = 0.001; r = 0.829, P = 0.042, respectively). The quality of life (QOL) was improved in 12 cases (48.0%), stable in 10 cases (40.0%), and decreased in 3 cases (12.0%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mainly related with chemotherapeutics, including neutropenia in 4 cases (16.0%), vomiting in 3 cases (12.0%) and arrhythmia in 1 case. No hypertension was observed. All the adverse reactions did not affect the following treatment, and there was no significant difference in incidence rate of grade 3 and 4 adverse events between the patients treated with long-term and short-term cycles.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Endostar combined with TP or NP regimen chemotherapy is effective and safe in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, especially in patients with long term treatment cycles which can effectively prolong TTP and reach long term survival, but not increase adverse events. The QOL of patients can be improved or remain stable. The changes of CECs may be used as a useful maker in predicting the efficacy of the combination treatment.</p>

Observation of the antitumor effect of endostar combined with docetaxel under different administration sequences / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe and analyze the antitumor effect of endostar combined with docetaxel under different administration sequences.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Nude mice with xenograft tumor (A549 cell line) were randomized into 3 groups, 8 mice/group: (1) Concurrent administration group (each mouse: endostar 400 µg/d, d1-d35, docetaxel 10 mg/kg, every 3 days, d1-d19); (2) Endo-first group (each mouse: endostar 400 µg/d, d1-d35, docetaxel 10 mg/kg, every 3 days, d16-d34); (3) Model group (positive control, tumor-bearing mice without treatment, each mouse: physiological saline, 100 µl/d, d1-d35, water for injection, 200 µl/d, d1-d35, every 3 days), and blank control group (negative control, normal mice without treatment, 8 mice), the administration method was the same to the model group. The volume of tumor and the weight of mouse were measured during treatment. Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) were detected by flowcytometry, and the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-2, MMP-9), the tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP-1, TIMP-2), the extracellular MMP inducer (EMMPRIN), CD34, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) were determined by immunohistochemistry.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The tumor growth of concurrent administration group (39.94 mm(3)) was lower than that of the endo-first group [(99.57 ± 74.48) mm(3)] during treatment, both of them were smaller than that of the model group [(217.67 ± 95.44) mm(3), P < 0.05]. The amount of CECs in the endo-first group [(77.25 ± 24.02) cells/10(4) cells] was more than that of the concurrent administration group [(25.86 ± 11.77) cells/10(4) cells], the model group [(14.71 ± 11.07) cells/10(4) cells], and the blank control group [(12.90 ± 11.20) cells/10(4) cells, P < 0.01]. The expression of MMPs in the treatment groups was obviously downregulated. The expressions of TIMP-1 in the endo-first group and TIMP-2 in the concurrent administration group were upregulated (P < 0.05). The expression of EMMPRIN was significantly down-regulated in the concurrent administration group (P < 0.05). The MVD and α-SMA expressions of the treatment groups were less than that of the model group (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>In comparison with the endo-first group, the anti-tumor effect and survival quality of the concurrent administration group are better. Both of the administration groups may have "vascular normalization effect" by down-regulating MMPs expression through different points, and inhibit the cancer-induced stromal reaction, restraining the cancer progress to a certain extent. The changes of CECs should be a dynamic process with an initial rise in the early-stage suggesting the decrease of vascular bed and subsequent decline ascribed to apoptosis of CECs and the tumor-regression after combined therapy. Investigation of its dynamic changes may be helpful to know the change of tumor burden and vascular bed and predict the antitumor effect.</p>

Analysis of cavitation of advanced NSCLC treated by rh-endostatin combined with NP chemotherapy / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the significance of intra-tumoral cavitation in the patients with advanced NSCLC treated by rh-endostatin plus NP chemotherapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty-seven patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with rh-endostatin plus NP or NP alone. The numbers of activated circulating endothelial cells (aCECs) were measured by flow cytometry. Chest computed tomography was performed to evaluate the efficacy after 2 cycles of chemotherapy.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Cavitation occurred in 5 of 29 patients in the rh-endostatin plus NP group, but not in any case of the NP group. Of the 5 patients, there were 2 males and 3 females, with pathological types of 3 adenocarcinomas, 1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma and 1 sarcomatoid carcinoma. All of these 5 cases had a peripherally located tumor in the CT scan. There was only one cavity in each case and most of these were roundish. Four cavities were situated in the center of the tumor and another one was eccentric. There were 3 cavities with thin wall and 2 with thick wall. Their average diameter was 2.7 cm. No hemoptysis occurred in these 5 patients. The blood-supply of the tumors showed by perfusion CT images was inhibited in 3 cases after treatment. The average number of aCECs decreased from 323.2/10(5) to 33.0/10(5) after treatment.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Intratumoral cavitation is a peculiar imaging characteristics after anti-angiogenic therapy, which may be caused by inhibition of blood-supply to the tumor. CT perfusion imaging and measurement of activated circulating endothelial cells may be helpful to predict the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy.</p>