RESUMEN
Purpose@#The aim of the present study was to compare the difference between double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy. @*Materials and Methods@#Patients who underwent radical proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy or double tract reconstruction were included in this study. @*Results@#Sixty-four patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to reconstruction method. The two groups were well balanced in perioperative safety and 3-year overall survival (OS). The rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis in the double tract reconstruction group and esophagogastrostomy group were 8.0% and 30.8%, respectively (p=0.032). Patients in the double tract reconstruction group had a better global health status (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p < 0.001), and complained less about nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001), pain (p=0.039), insomnia (p=0.003), and appetite loss (p < 0.001) based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Regarding the EORTC QLQ-STO22 questionnaire, patients in the double tract reconstruction group complained less about dysphagia (p=0.030), pain (p=0.008), reflux (p < 0.001), eating (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.001), dry mouth (p=0.007), and taste (p=0.001). The multiple linear regression analysis showed that reconstruction method, postoperative complications, reflux esophagitis, and operation duration had a linear relationship with the global health status score. @*Conclusion@#Double tract reconstruction could better prevent reflux esophagitis and improve quality of life without scarifying perioperative safety or 3-year OS.
RESUMEN
Purpose@#The aim of the present study was to compare the difference between double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy. @*Materials and Methods@#Patients who underwent radical proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy or double tract reconstruction were included in this study. @*Results@#Sixty-four patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to reconstruction method. The two groups were well balanced in perioperative safety and 3-year overall survival (OS). The rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis in the double tract reconstruction group and esophagogastrostomy group were 8.0% and 30.8%, respectively (p=0.032). Patients in the double tract reconstruction group had a better global health status (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p < 0.001), and complained less about nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001), pain (p=0.039), insomnia (p=0.003), and appetite loss (p < 0.001) based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Regarding the EORTC QLQ-STO22 questionnaire, patients in the double tract reconstruction group complained less about dysphagia (p=0.030), pain (p=0.008), reflux (p < 0.001), eating (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.001), dry mouth (p=0.007), and taste (p=0.001). The multiple linear regression analysis showed that reconstruction method, postoperative complications, reflux esophagitis, and operation duration had a linear relationship with the global health status score. @*Conclusion@#Double tract reconstruction could better prevent reflux esophagitis and improve quality of life without scarifying perioperative safety or 3-year OS.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of gastrointestinal decompression with enteral feeding tube in elderly patients with gastric cancer.Methods 78 cases of gastric cancer patients undergoing postoperative gastric decompression with enteral feeding tube were selected as the treatment group,and 66 patients with gastric cancer undergoing postoperative intravenous nutrition and gastric decompression with routine nasogastric tube as the control group in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2015.The incidence rate of gastric tube patency,faster postoperative recovery,nutritional immune improvement,adverse reaction and complication were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence rate of adverse reactions and complications in treatment group were significant lower than in control group (3.0 ％ vs.12.8 ％,x2 =4.4857,P =0.0342;1.5 ％ vs.10.2％,x2 =4.6620,P =0.0308,respectively).Following parameters were significant better in treatment group versus in control group:the time of evacuating [(3.1 ± 0.3) d vs.(4.0 ± 0.1) d,t =24.9227,P =0.0000],defecation[(4.3 ± 0.6) d vs.(5.5 ± 1.1) d,t =7.9189,P =0.0000],extubation [(5.3±1.3)d vs.(10.1±2.2)d,t=15.5690,P=0.0000],hospitalization[(12.3±2.5)d vs.(18.6± 3.2)d,t=12.9864,P=0.0000],postoperative body weight[(57.2±4.9)kg vs(49.0±7.2)kg,t=-7.8408,P=0.0000],plasma protein[(133.2± 11.2)g/L vs(104.5± 10.3)g/L,t=-16.0055,P=0.0000],hemoglobin[(4.7 ± 1.0) g/L vs (3.2 ± 0.6) g/L,t =-11.0991,P =0.0000] and peripheral blood lymphocyte count[(3.5 ± 0.7) × 109/L vs (2.1 ± 0.4) × 109/L,t =-15.0088,P =0.0000].Conclusions Effects of postoperative gastrointestinal decompression in elderly patients with gastric cancer are similar between with routine gastric tube and with enteral feeding tube.However,the enteral feeding tube-induced enteral nutrition shows fewer side effects and complications,better nutritional and immune effects,and faster postoperative recovery,which is worthy of a generalization and application.
RESUMEN
Since the biological characteristics of esophageal gastric junction (EGJ) cancer are different from those of gastric cancer and esophageal cancer, the choice of initial treatment is particularly important. This article introduces a case of locally advanced EGJ can-cer with single metastasis factor treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy in the Beijing Cancer Hospital. Through the multidisci-plinary team, we aim to achieve a better prognosis for this patient and propose new treatment practices for EGJ cancer.