C-reactive protein as a marker of postoperative complication of emergency colorectal surgery

Introduction: The literature converges regarding the use of C-reactive protein (CRP) tests between postoperative days (PODs) 3 and 5 of elective procedures. In this period, they have great sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for severe and anastomotic complications about two days before the first clinical sign. The few studies on colorectal urgency suggest that, despite the different initial values according to the surgical indication, following POD 3, the level of CRP is similar to that of elective procedures. However, given the heterogeneity of the studies, there is no consensus on the cutoff values for this use. Objective: To validate the use and propose a PO CRP cut-off value in urgent colorectal procedures as an exclusion criterion for complications of anastomosis or the abdominal cavity. Method: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 308 patients who underwent urgent colorectal surgical procedures between January 2017 and December 2019. The following data were considered: age, gender, surgical indication, type of procedure performed, complications, CRP levels preoperatively and from POD 1 to 4, and the severity of the complications. We compared the CRP levels and the percentage variations between the preoperative period and PODs 1 to 4 as markers of severe complications using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The levels of CRP on POD4, and their percentage drops between PODs 2 to 4 and PODs 3 to 4, were better to predict severe complications. A cutoff of 7.45mg/dL on POD 4 had 91.7% of sensitivity and NPV. A 50% drop between PODs 3 and 4 had 100% of sensitivity and NPV. Conclusion: Determining the level of CRP is useful to exclude severe complications, and it could be a criterion for hospital discharge in POD 4 of emergency colorectal surgery. (AU)

The Feasibility of Fundal Retraction of the Gallbladder in the Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison between a 4-instrument Fundal Retraction Group and a 3-instrument Group

PURPOSE: Owing to the accumulation of surgical experience, the indications of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) have increased. To overcome the difficulties and limitations of SLC, we included an additional instrument for use in retracting the gallbladder fundus. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of 4-instrument fundal retraction SLC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 134 patients who had undergone SLC for benign gallbladder disease. We compared the clinical outcome between patients who had undergone SLC without fundal retraction (3-instrument SLC, n=102) and those who had undergone SLC with fundal retraction (4-instrument fundal retraction SLC, n=32). RESULTS: Of 134 patients, 47 were male and 87 were female. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the 4-instrument fundal retraction group had gallbladder distention and wall thickening than patients in the 3-instrument SLC group. No statistically significant difference in the incidence of pericholecystic inflammation, adhesion, and gallbladder perforation; duration of operation, the incidence of complications, and duration of postoperative hospital stay was observed between the two groups. In univariate analysis to perform 4-instrument fundal retraction SLC, higher BMI, the presence of gallbladder distension, and wall thickening were significant factors. In multivariate analysis, gallbladder distention and the presence of concurrent operation during SLC were independently significant factors for performing 4-instrument fundal retraction SLC. CONCLUSION: Four-instrument fundal retraction SLC is a feasible and safe surgical procedure, particularly in patients with a high BMI, gallbladder distention, wall thickening, inflammation, or adhesions. If difficulties are encountered during 3-instrument SLC, simple fundal retraction using an additional instrument may be the preferred option prior to converting the operation to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Clinical analysis of intradermal subcutaneous suture in acute gastrointestinal tract incision / 中国医师杂志

Objective To investigate the relationship between wound suture and incision complications in acute gastrointesti -nal tract incision .Methods Patients with abdominal surgery ( acute digestive tract perforation , and acute intestinal obstruction ) were divided into two groups .The differences between two suture methods were compared with the indicators such as operative time , incision complications, and hospital stay, etc.Results There were no significant differences between two groups (12.5%vs 20%) in incision complications ( P >0.05 );while there were differences in the postoperative hospital stay between two groups .The hospital stay of the intradermalsubcutaneoussuturegroup(13.54±7.32)dweresignificantlyshorterthanthatoftraditionalgroup(18.11±11.67)d(P<0.05 ) .Conclusions Wound intradermal subcutaneous suture was superior to traditional suture in acute gastrointestinal tract inci -sion.No significant difference was found between two groups in incision complications , but wound intradermal subcutaneous suture had significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay .