RESUMEN
Objective:To compare the efficacy of morphine with intravenous injection and subcutaneous injection in the treatment of advanced cancer,and explore the indications of different drug delivery methods for high-dose morphine. Methods: A prospective study was performed,and 46 cases of patients with advanced cancer pain were collected and divided into intravenous group and subcutaneous group according to the administration route. Pain was assessed during the administration,and the analgesic efficiency and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed to compare the efficacy and safety of two different ways to give high-dose morphine. Results:No statisti-cally significant differences were found in the number of outbreaks needed to be rescued,the frequency of morphine-induced drug deliver-y,the efficiency of analgesia after opioid transfer,and the incidence of opioid-related side effects between the groups (P>0.05). The dose of morphine in the subcutaneous group was higher than that of the intravenous group(P<0.05). Conclusion:The continuous ad-ministration of morphine with intravenous injection and subcutaneous injection can quickly,safely and effectively relieve pain. With the same analgesic efficacy,patients can choose appropriate administration route according to the dose of morphine, the influence degree of primary diseases and the individual will.
RESUMEN
Objective: To discuss the conversion coefficient of morphine injection with continuous intravenous pump delivery or subcutaneous injection for the patients with advanced cancer pain demanding high dose of opioids.Methods: Using a retrospective survey, the patients with advanced cancer pain demanding high dose of opioids with poor efficacy were divided into 3∶1 group and 2.5∶1 group, and the conversion coefficient of 3∶1 or 2.5∶1 was used for the opioids equivalently conversed to intravenous or subcutaneous injection of morphine.After the conversion, the degree of pain relief, the analgesic efficiency in the conversion process, titration time, daily oral morphine equivalent amount at stable pain, morphine related adverse reactions and the other indicators were studied to evaluate the analgesic effect of morphine injection with different conversion coefficient.Results: There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups in the degree of pain relief, the effective rate of analgesia and the daily oral akministration amount of morphine at sable pain(P>0.05).The adjustment times for morphine in the two groups was (1.57±0.93) and (1.0±0.00), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).Conclusion: Giving morphine injection to the patients with terminal cancer pain demanding high dose of opioids with poor effect, the use of PCA pump through intravenous or subcutaneous injection can effectively relieve pain.Using the conversion coefficient of 2.5:1 can quickly complete the titration process, and safely achieve the effective analgesia.
RESUMEN
Objective To observe the analgesic effects of ethanol injection on advanced cancer patients by epidural two locus puncture. Methods Epidural two locus puncture was performed on 46 cases of advanced cancer patients. One locus was T 4 T 5, the other T 9 T 10 . Ethanol injection was used at the dose of 4 ml 95% ethanol on each locus. Results Satisfactory analgesic effect was found in all 46 patients. Conclusion Epidural two locus puncture is of wide diffusing range, low dose of injection and effective analgesia, which can overcome the disadvantage of partial analgesia by one locus puncture.