Clinical comparative Study Between Uncemented Anatomic Stem with and Without Lateral Porous Pad / 대한정형외과학회잡지

Authors performed a retrospective clinical and radiologic comparative study for 43 uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty which include 20 hips without lateral porous pad and 23 hips with lateral porous pad in same kinds of implant(Zimmer Anatomic") to investigate the role and significance of the lateral porous pad. The average follow up was 35 months and 38 months for without and with lateral porous pad respectively. The results were as followings: 1. Clinical and radiological results of group with and without lateral pad were similar together except incidence of radiolucency at zone 1 on anteroposterior radiograph in group without lateral pad was markedly higher compare to that in group with lateral pad. 2. The extent of lateral porous pad was not sufficiently enough to make better clinical and radiological results in stem with lateral pad compare to stem without lateral pad. 3. Stems without lateral porous pad had no evidence of bone ingrowth on lateral pad while stems with lateral pad had bone ingrowth on lateral pad with more than 50% in incidence. So, we think that presence and increase of extent of porous pad would have better clinical and radiological results.

Comparative Study between Uncemented Proximal Filling Stem and Distal Filling Stem: A retrospective matched-pair study / 대한정형외과학회잡지

The authors performed a retrospective matched-pair study for 54 uncemented total hip arthroplasties which were performed in management of avascular necrosis of femoral head from July, 1989 to May, 1991 to investigate what kind of stem is better between Anatomic stem as a proximal filling stem and Harris-Galante stem as a distal filling stem. The results were as followings: 1. Clinical results of Anatomic group were slightly better than those of Harris-Galante group in terms of incidence of thigh pain, groin or buttock pain and final functional score of hip. 2. Incidence of radiolucency around femoral stem in Harris-Galante group was higher than that in Anatomic group, especially in zone I, V of anteroposterior view and in zone IV of lateral view, which were statistically significant(p < 0.05). 3. The incidence of vertical subsidence of femoral stem in Harris-Galante group was significantly higher than that in Anatomic group(p < 0.05) and the average distance of subsidence was 3.2mm. 4. The incidence of endosteal osteolysis and bone resorption in Harris-Galante group was higher than that in Anatomic group. 5. In overall view, clinical and radiographic results of Anatomic group were better than those of Harris-Galante group.