RESUMEN
@#Objective To compare the ascending aortic diameter and postoperative outcomes of patients with simple ascending aortic dissection or simple ascending aortic dilatation and to study the reliability of the surgical indication in present guideline for Chinese patients with ascending aortic dilatation. Methods The clinical data of patients with aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection who underwent surgery at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. After exclusion of patients with Marfan syndrome, heart valve and other diseases, 139 patients were divided into two groups: a simple ascending aorta dilatation group (56 patients) and a simple ascending aortic dissection group (83 patients). The ascending aortic diameter and postoperative outcomes of two groups were compared. Results The inner ascending aortic diameter (57.30±9.41 mm vs. 50.72±9.53 mm, P <0.001) and the inner ascending aortic diameter index (31.12±5.38 vs. 27.22±6.40, P<0.001) in the simple ascending aorta dilatation group were significantly greater than those in the simple ascending aortic dissection group. For male patients, the results were similar (60.28±10.80 mm vs. 47.40±6.53 mm; 30.00±6.33 vs. 23.60±3.72, both P<0.001). But for the female patients, there was no significant difference between the two groups (54.90±7.47 mm vs. 53.81±10.84 mm; 32.03±4.37 vs. 30.58±6.56, both P>0.05). The mortality, the incidence of tracheotomy and postoperative reopen rate in the simple ascending aortic dissection group were higher. Conclusion In this study, the inner diameter of the ascending aorta in the group of ascending aorta is mostly < 5.5 cm. In our opinion, the present surgical indication for Chinese patients with ascending aortic dilatation is not enough. In the future clinical studies, we also need to find more reasonable surgical indications.
RESUMEN
Objective Atrial septal defect(ASD) or ventricular septal defect(VSD) To performe a retrospective analysis of ascending aortic dilation in adult patients with congenital ASD or VSD,and summarized the treatment experience and prognosis.Methods Retrospective analysis on preoperative data,intraoperative data,and postoperative data from the adult patients with ASD or VSD who developed ascending aortic dilation in our institution from February 2010 to January 2017.24 adult patients,19 males,5 females;aged(40.7 ± 14.4) years.Results All patients received surgical treatment.Their symptoms were all improved after surgery,no deaths occurred.Conclusion Surgery is safe for the ascending aortic dilation in adult patients with congenital ASD or VSD.Both proper perioperative treatment and close monitoring are required for the successful surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart disease, which affects 1-2 percent of the population. However, the relationship between BAVs and aortic dilation has not been sufficiently elucidated. METHODS: A total of 241 BAV patients who were referred to this hospital for cardiac surgey over a 4.75-year period were included in this study. In addition to the clinical characteristics of the included patients, the morphological features of the aortic valve and aorta, the length of the left main coronary artery, and the laboratory findings (the coagulation and hematological parameters as well as the total cholesterol concentration) were determined and compared with those of the tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. RESULTS: The BAV patients were younger than the TAV patients for a valve surgery in the last 3 months of the study period. The BAV patients were predominantly male. Most of the BAVs that were surgically treated were stenotic, regurgitant, or combined, and only 19 (7.88 percent) were normally functioning valves. According to echocardiography or operative records, 148 (78.31 percent) were type A, 31 (16.40 percent) were type B, and 10 (5.29 percent) were type C. The left main coronary artery was much shorter in the BAV patients than it was in the TAV patients. There was no significant difference between BAV and TAV patients in the total cholesterol concentrations; whereas differences were noted between patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy and those not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. The dimensions of the aortic root, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta were beyond normal limits, while they were significantly smaller in the BAV patients than in the TAV patients. They were also much smaller in patients receiving statin therapy than those not receiving statin therapy in both groups. Moreover, the aortic dilation in the BAV group was found to be significantly associated with patient age. CONCLUSIONS: ...