RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To investigate the characteristics and regularity of denosumab-associated atypical fractures (AF), so as to provide references for clinical rational use of drugs. METHODS The case reports of AF related to denosumab were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang data and VIP databases, and the reports were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS A total of 19 references were retrieved, including 20 patients. There were 3 males and 17 females, with an average age of (69.80± 15.39) years. Among 20 patients, primary diseases of 14 patients were osteoporosis, and 6 cases were malignant tumor bone metastasis and giant cell tumor of bone. The occurrence time of AF ranged from 3 to 132 months after the administration of denosumab, with an average of (42.14±29.49) months. Fourteen cases had prodromal symptoms before AF. There were 3 cases of ulna fractures, and the remaining 17 cases were femoral fractures. The vast majority of patients recovered well after discontinuing medication and undergoing surgical fixation, but some patients experienced delayed fracture healing. CONCLUSIONS Long-term use of denosumab should be vigilant against AF. When patients experience prodromal symptoms such as thigh, groin, hip joint and forearm pain, they should seek medical attention in a timely manner to ensure medication safety.
RESUMEN
Resumen Los bisfosfonatos constituyen uno de los pilares fundamentales en el manejo de la morbilidad ósea de los pacientes con varios tipos de tumores sólidos (1, 3). Sin embargo, a pesar de la experiencia que tenemos por su uso desde hace décadas, existen eventos adversos como las fracturas atípicas (FA) que por su baja frecuencia pueden pasar desapercibidas y no recibir un manejo adecuado. Existen pocos reportes en la literatura de FA en el manejo de pacientes con cáncer. Se presenta un caso en el cual una paciente con un tumor metacrónico de mama con metástasis ósea al debut, actualmente en remisión, presenta una FA de fémur tras recibir bisfosfonatos durante 8 años.
Abstract Bisphosphonates are one of the fundamental pillars in the treatment of bone morbidities in patients with different types of solid tumors.1-3 However, despite the experience that we have accumulated during decades, there are adverse events such as atypical fractures (AF) that due to their low frequency can go unnoticed and might not receive adequate management. There are few reports in the literature about AF in cancer treatments. We present a case of a patient with metachronous breast cancer and bone metastases at initial diagnosis, currently in remission, who presents AF of the femur after receiving bisphosphonates for 8 years.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Difosfonatos , Fracturas Óseas , Fémur , Terapéutica , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , NeoplasiasRESUMEN
Abstract: Introduction: Bisphosphonates have been the gold standard in the management of osteoporosis. Its antiresorptive effect has reduced the incidence of fractures due to bone fragility, as well as its impact on public health. We present the clinical case of a patient in prolonged treatment with bisphosphonates and atypical bilateral femur fracture. Case report: A 65-year-old female who presented a fall from her own height, on treatment with risedronate for seven years, and a history of systemic arterial hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, both with medical treatment. Diagnosed with bilateral atypical femoral fracture, treated with closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) with intramedullary nailing, application of calcium citrate and teriparatide. Discussion: Multiple studies indicate that the benefit of using bisphosphonates for osteoporosis is higher than the risk of presenting atypical fractures.
Resumen: Introducción: Los bifosfonatos han sido de gran utilidad en el manejo de la osteoporosis. Su efecto antirresortivo ha disminuido la incidencia de fracturas por fragilidad ósea, así como, su impacto en salud pública. Presentamos el caso clínico de una usuaria en tratamiento prolongado con bifosfonatos y fractura atípica de fémur bilateral. Caso clínico: Femenino de 65 años, presenta caía de su plano de sustentación, en tratamiento con risedronato desde hace siete años y antecedente de hipertensión arterial sistémica e hipercolesterolemia, ambas con manejo médico. Diagnosticada con fractura bilateral de fémur, tratada con enclavado centro-medular, citrato de calcio y teriparatida. Discusión: Múltiples estudios refieren que el beneficio del uso de bifosfonatos en la prevención del riesgo de fracturas es mayor, aunque exista la posibilidad de presentar fracturas atípicas.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Teriparatido , DifosfonatosRESUMEN
Bisphosphonates are widely prescribed and highly effective at limiting the bone loss that occurs in many disorders characterized by increased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, including senile osteoporosis in both men and women. Although, they are generally well-tolerated, potential adverse effects may limit bisphosphonate use in some patients. Optimal use of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis requires adequate calcium and vitamin D intake before and during therapy. Long-term adverse effects of bisphosphonate therapy include osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical fractures of femur. We report a case of a 78-year-old man who presented with pain and inability to move the left thigh from 11 am on the day of admission. He was diagnosed to have transverse subtrochanteric fracture of the left femur with relatively thick cortex. He had been religiously taking alendronate (a bisphosphonates) 70 mg once a week along with calcium preparation (elemental calcium 500 mg with cholecalciferol 250 units twice-daily) for 5 years. With this background of a ‘chalk stick’ like transverse fracture of the subtrochanteric region of femur in an otherwise healthy elderly man, an ‘atypical fracture of femur’ from long-term use of bishphosphonates was the likely cause.