Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in psychopathology between offspring of parents with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and those with bipolar II disorder (BP-II). METHODS: The sample included 201 offspring between 6 and 17 years of age who had at least one parent with BP-I or BP-II. The offspring were diagnostically evaluated using the Korean Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. Psychopathology and Clinical characteristics were evaluated, including lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, depression, and childhood trauma. Lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses were also compared between schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. RESULTS: In lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, offspring of parents with BP-I had significantly increased risk of developing MDD and BP-I than those with BP-II. Regarding clinical characteristics, ADHD rating scale and childhood trauma scale were significantly higher in offspring of parents with BP-I than that in those with BP-II. CONCLUSION: The present study supports that BP-I may be etiologically distinct from BP-II by a possible genetic liability. Our findings indicate that additional research related to bipolar offspring is needed to enhance understanding of differences between BP-I and BP-II.

Circadian Rhythm Characteristics in Mood Disorders: Comparison among Bipolar I Disorder, Bipolar II Disorder and Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVE: Morningness/eveningness (M/E) is a stable characteristic of individuals. Circadian rhythms are altered in episodes of mood disorder. Mood disorder patients were more evening-type than normal population. In this study, we compared the characteristics of M/E among the 257 patients with bipolar I disorder (BPD1), bipolar II disorder (BPD2) and major depressive disorder, recurrent (MDDR). METHODS: M/E was evaluated using the Korean version of the composite scale of morningness (CS). Factor analysis was done to extract specific elements of circadian rhythm (morning preference, morning alertness, and evening tiredness). The total score and scores for factors and individual items of CS were compared in order to evaluate differences among the three different diagnostic groups. Factor scores of CS were different among the diagnostic groups. RESULTS: BPD1 subjects had a higher score for evening tiredness than BPD2 subjects (p=0.060), and BPD1 subjects had a significantly higher score for morning alertness than subjects with MDDR (p=0.034). This difference was even more profound for the representative item scores of each factor; item 2 of CS for evening tiredness (BPD1>BPD2, p=0.007) and item 5 of CS for morning alertness (BPD1>MDDR, p=0.002). Total score of CS were not different among 3 diagnostic groups. CONCLUSION: Circadian rhythm characteristics measured by CS were different among BPD1, BPD2, and MDDR. BPD2 showed more eveningness than BPD1. MDDR showed less morningness than BPD1. CS would be a reasonable endophenotype associated with mood disorders. More studies with large sample size of mood disorders on M/E are warranted.

Comparative Study of Personality Traits in Patients with Bipolar I and II Disorder from the Five-Factor Model Perspective

OBJECTIVE: The distinguishing features of Bipolar I Disorder (BD I) from Bipolar II Disorder (BD II) may reflect a separation in enduring trait dimension between the two subtypes. We therefore assessed the similarities and differences in personality traits in patients with BD I and BD II from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model (FFM). METHODS: The revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) was administered to 85 BD I (47 females, 38 males) and 43 BD II (23 females, 20 males) patients. All included patients were in remission from their most recent episode and in a euthymic state for at least 8 weeks prior to study entry. RESULTS: BDII patients scored higher than BD I patients on the Neuroticism dimension and its four corresponding facets (Anxiety, Depression, Self-consciousness, and Vulnerability). In contrast, BD II patients scored lower than BD I patients on the Extraversion dimension and its facet, Positive emotion. Competence and Achievement-striving facets within the Conscientiousness dimension were significantly lower for BD II than for BD I patients. There were no significant between-group differences in the Openness and Agreeableness dimensions. CONCLUSION: Disparities in personality traits were observed between BD I and BD II patients from the FFM perspective. BD II patients had higher Neuroticism and lower Extraversion than BD I patients, which are differentiating natures between the two subtypes based on the FFM.

Verbal and Visual Memory Impairments in Bipolar I and II Disorder

OBJECTIVE: To compare verbal and visual memory performances between patients with bipolar I disorder (BD I) and patients with bipolar II disorder (BD II) and to determine whether memory deficits were mediated by impaired organizational strategies. METHODS: Performances on the Korean-California Verbal Learning Test (K-CVLT) and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF) in 37 patients with BD I, 46 patients with BD II and 42 healthy subjects were compared. Mediating effects of impaired organization strategies on poor delayed recall was tested by comparing direct and mediated models using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Both patients groups recalled fewer words and figure components and showed lower Semantic Clustering compared to controls. Verbal memory impairment was partly mediated by difficulties in Semantic Clustering in both subtypes, whereas the mediating effect of Organization deficit on the visual memory impairment was present only in BD I. In all mediated models, group differences in delayed recall remained significant. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that memory impairment may be one of the fundamental cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders and that executive dysfunctions can exert an additional influence on memory impairments.

Subsyndromal Depressive Symptoms in Bipolar II Disorder: a Community Mental Health Services Cohort Study (SIN-DEPRES) / Síntomas depresivos subsintomáticos en trastorno bipolar II: un estudio de cohorte de servicios de salud comunitarios

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and the impact of subclinical depressive symptoms (SDS) on the functional outcome of bipolar II (BD) outpatients in remission. Methods: Cross-sectional and prospective 16-week study of a cohort of 739 euthymic BD patients included by 94 investigators in Spain. Clinical stability was assessed at baseline and week 16 with the Clinical Global Impression scale for BD (CGI-BP-M), depressive symptoms at baseline with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Montgomery-Asberg Scale (MADRS) and the self-applied Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). Functional status was evaluated with the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) and Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS). Results: The sample of type II BD was composed by 202 patients. SDS were detected in 21.3% of patients (95% IC =15.9 to 27.6) at baseline. In apparently symptom-free patients, the incidence of SDS after 16 weeks was 29% (MADRS >7). At baseline, SDS patients compared to non-SDS presented poorer social-occupational performance (SOFAS mean difference -13.3, 95% CI from -17.1 to -9.5) and poorer social adjustment (SASS mean difference -4.3, 95% CI from -7.0 to -1.7). Depressive symptoms were inversely related to functional status and social adjustment: MADRS-SOFAS correlation coefficients r = -0.55 (p<0.0001) and MADRS-SASS correlation coefficients r = -0.43 (p<0.0001). The self-applied questionnaire identified additional cases with depressive symptoms at baseline, showing a SDS-Total prevalence of 51% identified by any method. A MADRS score 5 showed 0.75 sensitivity and 0.69 specificity in the detection of cases with possible SDS based on self-reported results as gold standard. Conclusions: Depressive symptoms in apparently remitted type II BD outpatients are common and as frequent as in other BD subtypes. These subclinical symptoms result in adverse occupational outcome and social maladjustment. MADRS and self-applied questionnaires during follow-up visits may provide important information about type II BD patients’ mood status and functionality.

Objetivos: Evaluar la prevalencia y el impacto de los síntomas depresivos subclínicos (SDS) en el resultado funcional de pacientes externos de bipolaridad II (TB) en remisión. Métodos: Estudio transversal y prospectivo, de 16 semanas de duración, de una cohorte de 739 pacientes eutímicos de TB incluidos por 94 investigadores en España. La estabilidad clínica se evaluó, en la línea base y en la semana 16, con la Escala Impresión Global Clínica para TB (CGI-BP-M); los síntomas depresivos, en la línea base, con la Escala de Calificación de la Depresión de Hamilton (HDRS), la Escala Montgomery-Asberg (MADRS) y la Escala Autoaplicada para la Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D). El estado funcional se evaluó con la Escala de Evaluación del Funcionamiento Social y Ocupacional (SOFAS), y la Escala de Autoevaluación de la Adaptación Social (SASS). Resultados: La muestra de TB tipo II estuvo compuesta de 202 pacientes. Se detectaron SDS en 21,3% de los pacientes (95% IC = 15,9 a 27,6) en la línea base. En pacientes que aparentemente no presentaban síntomas, la incidencia de SDS después de 16 semanas era de un 29% (MADRS>7). En la línea base, los pacientes SDS, en comparación con los no SDS, demostraban un desempeño social-ocupacional más pobre (diferencia media SOFAS -13,3, 95% IC de -17,1 a -9,5) y un ajuste social más pobre (diferencia media SASS -4,3, 95% IC de -7,0 a -1,7). Los síntomas depresivos estaban relacionados inversamente con el estado funcional y el ajuste social: coeficientes de correlación MADRS-SOFAS r = -0,55 (p<0,0001) y coeficientes de correlación MADRS-SASS r = -0,43 (p<0,0001). El cuestionario autoaplicado identificó casos adicionales con síntomas depresivos en la línea base, y mostró una prevalencia total de SDS de 51% identificada por cualquier método. Un puntaje MADRS ≥ 5 mostró una sensibilidad de 0,75 y una especificidad de 0,69 en la detección de casos con posible SDS, basándose en los resultados autoreportados como el estándar de oro. Conclusiones: Los síntomas depresivos en pacientes externos de TB de tipo II aparentemente en remisión son comunes y son tan frecuentes como para los demás subtipos de TB. Estos síntomas subclínicos tienen resultados ocupacionales adversos así como inadaptación social. La MADRS y los cuestionarios autoaplicados durante las visitas de seguimiento pueden ofrecer información importante acerca del estado de ánimo y la funcionalidad del paciente de TB tipo II.

Differences in Clinical Manifestations between Bipolar I and Bipolar II Disorders in Korean Population / 신경정신의학

OBJECTIVES : Whether bipolar II disorder (BP-II) is simply a milder form of bipolar I disorder (BP-I) or a valid diagnostic category that could be separated from BP-I, is an issue still under consideration. Investigations exploring differential clinical and biological features of the two conditions are needed to resolve the controversies. This study aimed to obtain a comprehensive view of differences in clinical course and symptoms characteristics between BP-I and BP-II. METHODS : 44 BP-I and 26 BP-II patients were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), Korean version. Demographic data, age at onset, number of (hypo) manic/ depressive episodes, the duration of illness, polarity at onset, seasonality, rapid cycling, atypical depression and symptom profiles of each episode were evaluated. RESULTS : BP-II patients experienced depressive episodes more frequently than BP-I patients after illness onset (U=240.5, p=0.008). More BP-II patients showed seasonality (34.9% vs. 61.5%) and a rapid cycling course (4.5% vs. 18.2%). When comparing symptom profiles of manic/hypomanic episodes, irritable mood, decreased sleep need, inattention, reckless behavior, arrogant/provocative attitude and frequent outbursts of anger were less encountered in BP-II patients. In depressive episodes, leaden paralysis and psychomotor agitation were more frequently observed in BP-II patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in psychotic symptoms of depressive episode. CONCLUSION : BP-I and BP-II disorders showed differences in clinical courses and symptom profiles. BP-II disorder seems to be less severe than BP-I disorder with regard to the intensity of manic symptoms, but more severe with respect to frequencies of depressive episodes. These results provide additional evidence supporting the distinction of BP-I and BP-II as separate diagnos-tic categories that might have different genetic profiles and/or biological mechanisms.

Differences in Clinical Manifestations between Bipolar I and Bipolar II Disorders in Korean Population / 신경정신의학

OBJECTIVES : Whether bipolar II disorder (BP-II) is simply a milder form of bipolar I disorder (BP-I) or a valid diagnostic category that could be separated from BP-I, is an issue still under consideration. Investigations exploring differential clinical and biological features of the two conditions are needed to resolve the controversies. This study aimed to obtain a comprehensive view of differences in clinical course and symptoms characteristics between BP-I and BP-II. METHODS : 44 BP-I and 26 BP-II patients were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), Korean version. Demographic data, age at onset, number of (hypo) manic/ depressive episodes, the duration of illness, polarity at onset, seasonality, rapid cycling, atypical depression and symptom profiles of each episode were evaluated. RESULTS : BP-II patients experienced depressive episodes more frequently than BP-I patients after illness onset (U=240.5, p=0.008). More BP-II patients showed seasonality (34.9% vs. 61.5%) and a rapid cycling course (4.5% vs. 18.2%). When comparing symptom profiles of manic/hypomanic episodes, irritable mood, decreased sleep need, inattention, reckless behavior, arrogant/provocative attitude and frequent outbursts of anger were less encountered in BP-II patients. In depressive episodes, leaden paralysis and psychomotor agitation were more frequently observed in BP-II patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in psychotic symptoms of depressive episode. CONCLUSION : BP-I and BP-II disorders showed differences in clinical courses and symptom profiles. BP-II disorder seems to be less severe than BP-I disorder with regard to the intensity of manic symptoms, but more severe with respect to frequencies of depressive episodes. These results provide additional evidence supporting the distinction of BP-I and BP-II as separate diagnos-tic categories that might have different genetic profiles and/or biological mechanisms.