RESUMEN
Backgroung: Brazil was slow to implement an expanded testing policy for COVID-19, which may have affected the most vulnerable population's access to testing services.Objective: to evaluate the factors associated with performing the molecular test for COVID-19.Methods: cross-sectional study of secondary data from the COVID-19 panel in the state of Espírito Santo. COVID-19 suspicion notification forms were included between September 11, 2020 and March 2, 2021. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI95%).Results: 419,771 notification forms were analyzed. The prevalence of performing the molecular teste for COVID-19 was 81.1% (CI95% 81.0-81.2). Elderly (OR= 2.70 CI95% 2.56-2.85), health professional (OR=1 .43 CI95% 1.36-1.50), chronic cardiovascular disease (OR=1.13 CI95% 1.09-1.17), diabetes mellitus (OR=1.07 CI95% 1.01- 1.14) and hospitalization (OR=5.95 CI95% 4.53;7.82) were more likely to have undergone the molecular test. Male sex (OR=0.96 CI95% 0.94-0.98), black skin color (OR=0.75 CI95% 0.73-0.78), yellow skin color (OR=0.74 CI95% 0.71-0.77), residing in the northern health region (OR=0.37 CI95% 0.36-0.39) and the homeless population (OR=0.76 CI95% 0.67-0.85) had the lowest chance of having undergone the molecular test.Conclusion: Social, economic, contextual factors and the risk of aggravation of the disease were associated with carrying out the molecular test for COVID-19 in the state of Espírito Santo. Actions are needed to guarantee the access of the most vulnerable population to molecular testing.
Introdução: o Brasil demorou a implementar uma política de testagem ampliada para COVID-19 no qual pode ter afetado o acesso da população mais vulnerável aos serviços de testagem.Objetivo: analisar os fatores associados à realização de testes moleculares para o diagnóstico da COVID-19.Método: estudo transversal de dados secundários do painel COVID-19 do estado do Espírito Santo. Foram incluídas fichas de notificação de suspeita de COVID-19 entre 11 de setembro de 2020 a 02 de março de 2021. Empregou-se regressão logística hierárquica para estimativa de razão de chances (odds ratio, OR) com intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%).Resultados: Foram incluídos no estudo 419.771 fichas de notificação. A prevalência da realização do teste molecular para COVID-19 foi 81,1 % (IC95% 81,0%;81,2%). Idosos (OR= 2,70 IC95% 2,56-2,85), profissional da saúde (OR=1,43 IC95% 1,36-1,50), doença cardiovascular crônica (OR=1,13 IC95% 1,09-1,17), diabetes mellitus (OR=1,07 IC95% 1,01-1,14) e hospitalização (OR=5,95 IC95% 4,53;7,82) apresentaram maior chance de ter realizado o teste molecular. Sexo masculino (OR=0,96 IC95% 0,94-0,98), cor da pele preta (OR= 0,75 IC95% 0,73-0,78), cor da pele amarela (OR=0,74 IC95% 0,71-0,77), residir na região norte de saúde (OR=0,37 IC95% 0,36-0,39) e a população em situação de rua (OR=0,76 IC95% 0,67-0,85) apresentaram a menor chance de ter realizado o teste molecular.Conclusão: Fatores sociais, econômicos e o risco de agravamento da doença foram associados a realização do teste molecular para COVID-19 no estado do Espírito Santo. É necessário ações que garantam o acesso da população mais vulnerável ao teste molecular.
RESUMEN
Resumen Introducción: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha afectado a millones de personas en todo el mundo. La identificación de sujetos infectados ha sido importante para el control. Objetivo: Evaluar el rendimiento de una reacción de polimerasa en cadena (RPC) cuantitativa en tiempo real (en inglés: RT-qPCR) para SARS-CoV-2, utilizando saliva como matriz en comparación con un hisopado nasofaríngeo (HNF). Metodología: Se reclutaron adultos en atención ambulatoria, la mayoría sintomáticos. Fueron estudiadas 530 muestras pareadas de saliva e HNF con RT-qPCR. Resultados: Fueron positivas 59 muestras de HNF y 54 de saliva. La sensibilidad con saliva fue 91%, especificidad 100%, el valor predictor positivo (VPP) 100%, valor predictor negativo (VPN) 98%. El índice Kappa fue de 0,95 y LR-0,08. En promedio, el umbral de ciclo (en inglés cycle threshold-CT) de la saliva fue 3,99 puntos más alto que los de HNF (p < 0,0001) mostrando que la carga viral (CV) es menor en saliva. La carga viral en ambas disminuyó con el tiempo después del inicio de los síntomas. El muestreo de saliva fue preferido por los sujetos en lugar de HNF. Conclusión: Este estudio demuestra que la RPC para SARS-CoV-2 utilizando saliva, es adecuada para el diagnóstico de COVID-19 en adultos ambulatorios, especialmente en la etapa temprana de los síntomas.
Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions of people around the world. Part of control strategies is testing a large proportion of the population to identify and isolate the infected subjects. Aim: To evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 detection by the performance of a reverse transcription and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) against SARS-CoV-2, using saliva as a matrix compared to a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) to simplify obtaining a diagnostic sample. Methods: Adults in outpatient care were recruited, 95% of them symptomatic. We studied 530 paired saliva and NPS samples by SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR. Results: Fifty-nine individuals tested positive in NPS and 54 in saliva samples. Sensitivity for saliva sample was 91%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98%. The Kappa index was 0.95 and LR-0.08. On average, the cycle threshold (CT) of saliva was 3.99 points higher than those of NPS (p < 0.0001) showing that viral load (VL) is lower in saliva than in NPS. Viral load in both decreased over the time after onset of symptoms. Saliva sampling was preferred by subjects instead of NPS. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR using saliva, even with lower VL, is suitable for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in outpatient adults, especially at early stage of symptoms.