Modelo de Cascada de Atención para la co-infección de las hepatitis virales para el cuidado continuo en personas con VIH/Sida / Care Continuum Model for Coinfection of Viral Hepatitis for the Continuing Care in people living with HIV / AIDS

Introducción: las coinfecciones con hepatitis virales y el VIH representan un riesgo por su alta transmisibilidad y complicaciones. Es de vital importancia que se puedan identificar las barreras de acceso y manejo de las coinfecciones del VIH y la Hepatitis B y C. El propósito del estudio es describir la cascada de atención para la coinfección de las hepatitis virales en personas viviendo con VIH/SIDA. Métodos: se delimitaron los indicadores de manejo y seguimiento de los pacientes monitoreados actualmente en clínicas de primer nivel de atención en Santo Domingo y Santiago. Los datos recopilados fueron analizados a partir de los registros escritos de los pacientes en seguimiento, para evaluar los datos epidemiológicos y serológicos que se obtuvieron de los archivos clínicos. Resultados: se demostró que un 100 % de los pacientes fueron enrolados, 85.7 % se consideraron como retenidos en el manejo de la coinfección VIH/VHB y solamente 71.4 % recibieron TARV basado en Tenofovir. La cascada de atención para la coinfección VIH/VHC muestra un vínculo de 87.5 % de los pacientes, 75 % fueron retenidos y ninguno recibió tratamiento. Conclusión: la identificación de los factores de riesgo que influyen en las brechas de la cascada es fundamental para optimizar el manejo y monitoreo de los pacientes coinfectados, teniendo en cuenta que es preciso poder reconocer aquellos infectados para iniciar tratamiento de inmediato y así prever secuelas citopatológicas hepáticas

Introduction: Co-infections of viral hepatitis and HIV represent a risk due to their high transmissibility and complications. It is vitally important that barriers to access and management of HIV and Hepatitis B and C co-infections can be identified. The purpose of the study is to describe the cascade of attention for the preparation of viral hepatitis in people living with HIV/AIDS. Methods: The management and follow-up indicators of the patients currently monitored in first-level care clinics in Santo Domingo and Santiago were delimited. The data collected was analyzed from the written records of the patients in follow-up to evaluate the epidemiological and serological data that was obtained from the clinical files. Results: It was demonstrated that 100% of the patients were enrolled, 85.7% were considered as retained in care of HIV / HBV coinfection and only 71.4% received ARTbased on Tenofovir. The cascade of care for HIV / HCV coinfection shows a linkage to care of 87.5% of patients, 75% were retained and none received treatment. Conclusions: Identifying the risk factors that influence the gaps in the cascade of care is essential to optimize the management and monitoring of coinfected patients, with special interest in those that might receive immediate treatment to prevent liver cytopathological sequelae

Hepatitis C among blood donors: cascade of care and predictors of loss to follow-up

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To investigate the HCV cascade of care and to identify the factors associated with loss or absence to follow-up of patients identified as infected with hepatitis C through blood donation. METHODS Blood donors from 1994 to 2012, identified with positive anti- HCV by enzyme immunoassay and immunoblot tests were invited to participate in the study, through letters or phone calls. Patients who agreed to participate were interviewed and their blood samples were collected for further testing. The following variables were investigated: demographic data, data on comorbidities and history concerning monitoring of hepatitis C. Multiple regression analysis by Poisson regression model was used to investigate the factors associated with non-referral for consultation or loss of follow-up. RESULTS Of the 2,952 HCV-infected blood donors, 22.8% agreed to participate: 394 (58.2%) male, median age 48 years old and 364 (53.8%) Caucasian. Of the 676 participants, 39.7% did not receive proper follow-up or treatment after diagnosis: 45 patients referred not to be aware they were infected, 61 did not seek medical attention and 163 started a follow-up program, but were non-adherent. The main reasons for inadequate follow-up were not understanding the need for medical care (71%) and health care access difficulties (14%). The variables showing a significant association with inadequate follow-up after multiple regression analysis were male gender (PR = 1.40; 95%CI 1.15–1.71), age under or equal to 50 years (PR = 1.36; 95%CI 1.12–1.65) and non-Caucasians (PR = 1.53; 95%CI 1.27–1.84). CONCLUSIONS About 40.0% of patients did not receive appropriate follow-up. These data reinforce the need to establish strong links between primary care and reference centers and the need to improve access to specialists and treatments.