RESUMEN
Objective:To compare the efficacy and complication in clinical application about the indwelling central venous transfusion port and peripheral venipuncture central vein indwelling catheter.Methods: 80 cases with indwelling central vein transfusion port were arranged to observation group and 80 cases with peripheral venipuncture central vein indwelling catheter were arranged to control group. All of patients were detected for blood routine, blood coagulation time and chest X-ray fluoroscopy routine examination before operation. And to take venipuncture by right subclavicle of patient skin under X-ray fluoroscopy guided, and then indwell catheter. To compare the clinical effect for the two kinds of indwelling catheter method.Results:In observation group, the successful rate was 97.5% (78/80), the average operation time was (51.23±10.21) min; while in control, the successful rate was 78.8% (63/80), the average operation time was (67.42±11.03)min, there were statistical significant difference in successful rate (x2=13.44,P<0.05) and average operation time (t=9.63,P<0.05) between observation and control group. In observation group, the rate of complications occurred was 13.75% (11/80), which was significant lower than 32.5% of control (26/80)(x2=7.91,P<0.05).Conclusion: It is safe and reliable to use the dwelling central venous transfusion port, and the complication of some patients mainly related with nursing skill of paramedic and the proficiency degree of pillbox puncture and using skill in this operation.