Cephalometric comparison of dentofacial parameters between Yemeni and Caucasian adults / Comparação cefalométrica de parâmetros dentofaciais entre adultos iemenitas e caucasianos

Objective: The purposes of our research were to establish cephalometric standards for Yemeni adults and to compare them with those of the Caucasians. Material and Methods: 100 Yemeni students (fifty males, mean age of 23.6 ± 2.1 years, and fifty female, mean age of 21.5 ± 3.1 years) with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces were involved in the study. Inclusion criteria were a class I occlusion with minor or no crowding, the whole teeth is present except third molars and no previous orthodontic, orthopedic or maxillofacial surgery treatment. Five angular and eighteen linear measurements were used for the skeletal, dental and soft tissue analysis. All participant's Lateral cephalometric radiographs were evaluated. The average values and standard deviations for all the angles and linear measurements were determined. The differences for each measurement between the Yemeni and Caucasian participants were calculated using unpaired t­tests. Results: Yemeni subjects had a more retrognathic mandibular positions (P< 0.05), protrusive mandibular incisors (P< 0.01), more protruded lip positions (P < 0.01), deeper mentolabial sulci (P< 0.01) and a steeper mandibular planes (P< 0.001) compared to the Caucasians. Yemeni females had a larger lower face height than Caucasian females (P< 0.001). Conclusions The study provides specific standards for Yemeni adults and shows that the Yemenis had different skeletal and dentoalveolar cephalometric standards in comparison with Caucasians (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo de nossa pesquisa foi estabelecer padrões cefalométricos para adultos iemenitas e compará-los com os caucasianos. Material e Métodos: Cem estudantes iemenitas (cinquenta homens, idade média de 23,6 ± 2,1 anos, e cinquenta mulheres, idade média de 21,5 ± 3,1 anos) com oclusões normais e faces bem equilibradas foram envolvidos no estudo. Os critérios de inclusão foram: oclusão de classe I com pouco ou nenhum apinhamento, todos os dentes presentes, exceto terceiros molares e sem histórico de tratamento ortodôntico, ortopédico ou cirurgia maxilo-facial prévio. Cinco medidas angulares e dezoito lineares foram utilizadas para a análise esquelética, dentária e de tecidos moles. Todas as radiografias cefalométricas laterais dos participantes foram avaliadas. Foram determinados os valores médios e desvios padrão para todos os ângulos e medidas lineares. As diferenças para cada medição entre os participantes iemenitas e caucasianos foram calculadas usando testes t não pareados. Resultados: Os indivíduos iemenitas tinham posições mandibulares mais retrognáticas (P <0,05), incisivos inferiores protrusivos (P <0,01), posições dos lábios mais protuberantes (P <0,01), sulcos mentolabiais mais profundos (P <0,01) e planos mandibulares mais inclinados (P <0,001) em comparação com os caucasianos. As mulheres iemenitas tinham uma altura facial inferior maior do que as mulheres brancas (P <0,001). Conclusão:O estudo fornece padrões específicos para adultos iemenitas e mostra que os iemenitas apresentaram padrões cefalométricos esqueléticos e dentoalveolares diferentes em comparação com os caucasianos. (AU)

A comparative study of pre- and post-treatment cephalometric measurements : extraction vs. non-extraction groups of Class I malocclusion / 대한치과교정학회지

71 Class I maloccousion samples were selscted and they were divided into premolar-extraction and non-extraction groups. Vertical and horizontal cephalometric evaluations on dental and soft tissue measurements were done before and after treatment. Also, treatment results in adolescent patients and adult patients were compared. The following conclusions were obrained: 1. In comparison of extraction and non-extraction groups, all the dental and soft tissue measurements, with exception of SN-MP angle, upper lip to E-line, vertical movement of upper first molar, and horizintal movement of lower first molar, showed statistically significant differences. 2. In comparison of extraction and non-extraction groups of adolescent samples, there were statistically significant differences in upper and lower incisor inclinations, horizontal dental movements from vertical reference line, positional changes in upper and lower lips, and mesial movements of upper first molar. 3. In comparison of extraction and non-extraction groups of adult samples, there were statistically sigmificant differences in upper and lower incisor inclinations, horizintal dental movements from vertical reference line, positional changes in upper and lower lips from E-line and vertical reference line, vertical hright of upper first molar, and mesial morement of lower first molar. 4. There was no statistically significant difference in SN-MP angle between extraction and non-extraction groups od both adolescent and adult samples.