RESUMEN
@#Objective To investigate the effect of several types of cervical braces used for external immobilization on craniovertebral junction malformation. Methods 48 patients with craniovertebral junction malformation applied several types of cervical braces, including Philadelphia collar, sterno-occipito-mandibular immobilizer (SOMI) and Halo-vest, for the surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Results The primary applications of external cervical brace after posterior internal craniovertebral fixation in this series were 20 cases of Philadelphia collar, 16 cases of SOMI and 12 cases of Halo-vest, with excellent or good results in 80%, 87.5% and 91.7%. The applications of external brace for post-hospital recovery were 16 cases of collar, 15 cases of SOMI and 17 cases of Halo-vest. 35 (72.9%) patients were followed-up for at least 4 months, with satisfying immobilization and duration which fulfilled the requirements for post-operative recovery. Conclusion The applications of the all of 3 kinds of external brace, including collar, SOMI and Halo-vest, have their important clinical value for peri-operational and post-operational recovery in the treatment of patients with craniovertebral junction malformation. To have a reasonable choice of these brace in different patients, the characteristics of pathology as well as the surgical stages should be taken into account.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of cervical orthosis upon swallowing and the differences of bracing effect between normal people and spinal cord injured patients. METHOD: 12 normal adults and 32 cervical cord injured patients who were wearing one of the three common cervical orthoses (soft neck collar, Philadelphia brace, and Minerva brace) were recruited. Swallowing function was evaluated by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) without cervical bracing for the baseline data and with cervical bracing to compare with baseline data. The parameters observed were oropharyngeal diameter, initiation point of swallowing, hyoid bone movement, laryngeal penetration, aspiration, and residual volume after swallowing. RESULTS: Cervical orthoses decreased oropharyngeal diameter, reduced hyoid bone movement, increased residual volume, and changed initiation point of swallowing. Minerva brace revealed to give more influence than other braces. Normal adult group and patient group showed no difference in cervical bracing effect. CONCLUSION: Attention should be paid to swallowing function when cervical bracing is needed because cervical bracing itself can increase the risk of aspiration.