Avaliação do cuidado hospitalar pelo risco de óbito / Evaluation of hospital care by risk of death

A taxa de mortalidade hospitalar é tradicionalmente usada para medir a qualidade do cuidado nas unidades hospitalares, no entanto a mesma não consegue discriminar o risco de óbito proveniente da assistência oferecida e da carga de comorbidades que o paciente tem no momento da internação. A Razão de Mortalidade Hospitalar Padronizada (RMHP) é um índice que possibilita avaliar a qualidade do cuidado de acordo com o perfil dos pacientes atendidos pelo hospital. Resultados da RMHP < 1 indica uma qualidade melhor que a esperada e resultados > 1 apontam qualidade pior que a esperada. Assim este estudo propôs avaliar a qualidade da assistência hospitalar prestada no âmbito da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de Goiás, considerando seu perfil assistencial e os tipos de pacientes atendidos, no período de 2014 a 2019. O cálculo da RMHP foi baseado na metodologia de Jarman et al., no Índice de Comorbidades de Charlson (ICC) E Índice de Elixhauser para avaliar o risco de óbito, e posterior aplicação da curva ROC (para encontrar o modelo de ajuste de risco) e da regressão linear logística multivariada. A qualidade da assistência prestada no Estado de Goiás, considerando o perfil dos pacientes atendidos, foi pior que o esperado nos anos de 2014 a 2016, dentro do esperado no ano 2017 e melhor que o esperado nos anos de 2018 e 2019. Observou-se uma melhora gradativa na qualidade do cuidado nos últimos três anos

The hospital mortality rate is traditionally used to measure the quality of care in hospital units, however it cannot discriminate the risk of death resulting from the assistance provided and the burden of comorbidities that the patient has at the time of hospitalization. The Standardized Hospital Mortality Ratio (RMHP) is an index that makes it possible to assess the quality of care according to the profile of patients treated by the hospital. RMHP results < 1 indicate better quality than expected and results > 1 indicate worse quality than expected. Thus, this study proposed to assess the quality of hospital care provided by the State Health Department of Goiás, considering its care profile and the types of patients cared for, in the period from 2014 to 2019. The RMHP calculation was based on Jarman's methodology et al., in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (ICC) and Elixhauser Index to assess the risk of death, and subsequent application of the ROC curve (to find the risk adjustment model) and multivariate logistic linear regression. The quality of care provided in the State of Goiás, considering the profile of the patients cared for, was worse than expected in the years 2014 to 2016, within expectations in 2017 and better than expected in the years 2018 and 2019. A gradual improvement in the quality of care in the last three years

Evaluation Of Charlson’s Co-Morbidity Index And Risk Factors Among Patients With And Without Extended Spectrum Β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae Spp. Urinary Isolates In A Super-Specialty Hospital.

Background & Objectives: Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae are emerging worldwide The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors, co-morbidity status and short term mortality rates among hospitalized patients with and without ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae spp. urinary isolates. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study conducted in a super-specialty hospital from December 2014 to July 2015. Urine samples from 100 patients which repeatedly yielded significant colony counts of Enterobacteriaceae spp. isolates were identified using standard biochemical tests. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of these isolates was carried out by modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method as per CLSI guidelines 2014. Isolates which were resistant to cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime were tested for the production of ESBL by phenotypic confirmatory disc diffusion test. Relevant clinico-epidemiological details of these patients were subsequently obtained from Medical records as per the proforma formulated. The original version of the Charlson Index (CI) was used to assess co-morbidity and short term mortality rates. Results & Interpretation: Escherichia coli followed by Klebsiella pneumonia were the predominant isolates. 40 isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers. All isolates had Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) index of >0.2. The p-value of difference in proportion of all the risk factors distributed among patients with and without ESBL producing urinary Enterobacteriaceae spp. isolates respectively was found to be >0.05. The p-value of difference in mean Charlson index scores between these two groups of patients was 0.45. Conclusions: The results obtained in our study are largely inconclusive. It is imperative that more number of multicentre studies should be conducted in order to generate conclusive evidence on this subject. [Mohit B NJIRM 2016; 7(5):40-45]