Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 213
Filtrar
1.
Acta Medica Philippina ; : 1-7, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1012445

RESUMEN

Background and Objective@#Primary care providers are key players in providing quality care to patients and advancing Universal Health Care (UHC). However, effective and quality healthcare delivery may be affected by inadequate knowledge and failure to adhere to evidence-based guidelines among providers. The Philippine Primary Care Studies (PPCS) is a five-year program that pilot tested interventions aimed at strengthening the primary care system in the country. Evidence-based training modules for healthcare providers were administered in Sorsogon and Bataan from the years 2018 to 2021. Module topics were selected based on common health conditions encountered by providers in rural and remote settings. This program aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of training in increasing provider knowledge.@*Methods@#A series of training workshops were conducted among 184 remote- and 210 rural-based primary care providers [nurses, midwives, barangay or village health workers (BHWs)]. They covered four modules: essential intrapartum and newborn care (EINC), integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI), non-communicable diseases (NCD), and geriatrics. A decision support system (UpToDate) was provided as a supplementary resource for all participants. We administered pre-tests and post-tests consisting of multiple-choice questions on common health conditions. Data was analyzed using paired one-tailed t-test, with an alpha of 0.05.@*Results@#The knowledge of nurses, midwives, and BHWs improved after the training workshops were conducted. The largest increase from pre-test to post-test scores were observed among the midwives, with a mean difference (MD) of 32.9% (95% CI 23.9 to 41.9) on the EINC module, MD of 25.0% (95% CI 16.6 to 33.4) in the geriatrics module, and MD of 13.5% (95% CI 6.9 to 20.1) in the NCDs module. The nurses had the greatest improvement in the IMCI module (MD 10.8%, 95% CI 2.5 to 19.1). The knowledge of BHWs improved in all participated modules, with greatest improvement in the NCD module (MD 9.0%, 95% CI 5.77 to 12.14). @*Conclusions@#Primary care workshops, even if conducted as single-sessions and on a short-term basis, are effective in improving short-term knowledge of providers. However, this may not translate to long-term knowledge and application in practice. Furthermore, comparisons across provider categories cannot be made as participant composition for each training workshop varied. Ultimately, this study shows enhancing provider knowledge and competence in primary care will therefore require regular and diverse learning interventions and access to clinical decision support tools.


Asunto(s)
Creación de Capacidad , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Filipinas , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 161-168, 2024.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1006506

RESUMEN

@#After tooth extraction, significant absorption occurs in the soft and hard tissues of the alveolar ridge. The goal of alveolar ridge preservation is to maintain the volume and shape of the alveolar ridge's soft and hard tissues as much as possible so as to provide suitable conditions for implant placement. Currently, there are challenges in classifying the socket for alveolar ridge preservation, such as the difficulty in directly guiding the selection of graft materials and clinical procedures and the insufficient space for particle xenograft maintenance, resulting in poor bone regeneration. Plasmatrix is an autologous blood derivative that effectively enhances tissue regeneration. This article introduced the characteristics of soft and hard tissue defects after tooth extraction and the primary applications of plasmatrix for alveolar ridge preservation (liquid plasmatrix, solid plasmatrix membrane/plug, and plasmatrix bone blocks) as well as the proposed methods for the reclassification of sockets for alveolar ridge preservation based on soft and hard tissue defects at the extraction site to facilitate the creation of clinical recommendations. The proposed classifications are as follows: Class I, extraction socket without bone defect, with or without soft tissue defect; Class Ⅱ, extraction socket with bone defect, both sides with bone wall defect less than 50%, with or without soft tissue defect; Class Ⅲ, extraction socket with bone tissue defect, at least one side with bone wall defect greater than 50%, with or without soft tissue defect. For the Class I socket, a solid plasmatrix membrane or plug is inserted, followed by injection of liquid plasmatrix, using a double-layer solid plasmatrix membrane for socket closure; for the ClassⅡ socket, plasmatrix bone blocks are inserted, followed by injection of liquid plasmatrix and secondary solidification, using absorbable collagen membrane and double-layer solid plasmatrix membrane for socket closure; for the ClassⅢ socket, tenting screws are used to maintain height, followed by implantation of plasmatrix bone blocks, injection of liquid plasmatrix and secondary solidification, using absorbable collagen membrane and double-layer solid plasmatrix membrane for socket closure. The aim of this article is to provide comprehensive knowledge of plasmatrix for oral clinicians to serve as a reference to simplify the clinical decision-making process and procedures for alveolar ridge preservation.

3.
CoDAS ; 36(4): e20230276, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1557623

RESUMEN

RESUMO Objetivo validar o conteúdo do Teste de Concordância de Scripts em Fonoaudiologia, denominado FonoTCS. Método Trata-se de estudo de validação de conteúdo de instrumento. Participaram da construção do FonoTCS cinco fonoaudiólogas, doutoras e docentes, com média de 24,8 anos de atuação profissional, que chegaram a um consenso durante o processo de construção do teste. Elaborou-se 30 questões e 120 itens contemplando as áreas de atuação fonoaudiológica. Em seguida, 15 fonoaudiólogas com titulação mínima de mestre, e com, no mínimo, 10 anos de atuação clínica generalista receberam eletronicamente o FonoTCS para validação de conteúdo por meio de questionário sobre critérios de clareza, ética e pertinência do conteúdo das questões. Para a análise das respostas calculou-se o Coeficiente de Validade de Conteúdo Corrigido de todas as afirmativas. Foram revisadas as questões com porcentagem de concordância igual ou inferior a 80%. Resultados 13 avaliadores responderam a análise, todos do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 39,07 anos, sendo oito mestres e cinco doutoras, com atuação clínica generalista média de 15,38 anos. Os valores médios do Coeficiente de Validade de Conteúdo Corrigido foram 0,93 e 0,95 para o critério de clareza; 0,98 e 0,92 para o critério de pertinência; e 0,99 para o critério de ética. Duas questões apresentaram notas de 0,78 e 0,80, sendo ambas da área de audiologia no domínio de avaliação/diagnóstico, para a questão relacionada ao critério de pertinência, sendo revisadas e reestruturadas pelos juízes. Conclusão O FonoTCS é um instrumento válido do ponto de vista do conteúdo.


ABSTRACT Purpose To validate the content of the Speech-Language Pathology Concordance Test called FonoTCS. Methods This is a content validation study of the instrument. Five speech-language pathologists, all with doctoral degrees and teaching experience, averaging 24.8 years of professional practice, participated in the development of FonoTCS and reached a consensus during the process. Thirty questions and 120 items were created, covering seven areas of speech-language pathology expertise across three domains. For content validation, FonoTCS was electronically sent to 15 evaluators to respond to a questionnaire with five questions, rated on a five-point scale, regarding the criteria of clarity, ethics, and relevance of the questions. The Corrected Content Validity Coefficient was calculated for all statements to analyze the responses. Questions with agreement percentages equal to or less than 80% were revised. Results Thirteen evaluators, all female, with an average age of 39.07 years, including eight with master's degrees and five with doctoral degrees, and an average clinical practice experience of 15.38 years, participated in the analysis. The average Corrected Content Validity Coefficient values for the clarity criterion were 0.93 and 0.95, for the relevance criterion 0.98 and 0.92, and for the ethics criterion 0.99. Two questions received scores of 0.78 and 0.80, both related to the audiology area in the assessment/diagnosis domain, specifically question 2 regarding the relevance criterion. These questions were reviewed and restructured by the judges. Conclusion FonoTCS is a valid instrument from a content perspective.

4.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 22: eAE0780, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1557723

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective We aimed to share our experience in implementing a structured system for COVID-19 lung findings, elucidating key aspects of the lung ultrasound score to facilitate its standardized clinical use beyond the pandemic scenario. Methods Using a scoring system to classify the extent of lung involvement, we retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound reports performed in our institution according to COVID-RADS standardization. Results The study included 69 thoracic ultrasound exams, with 27 following the protocol. The majority of patients were female (52%), with ages ranging from 1 to 96 years and an average of 56 years. Classification according to COVID-RADS was as follows: 11.1% in category 0, 37% in category 1, 44.4% in category 2, and 7.4% in category 3. Ground-glass opacities on tomography correlated with higher COVID-RADS scores (categories 2 and 3) in 82% of cases. Ventilatory assessment revealed that 50% of cases in higher COVID-RADS categories (2 and 3) required second-line oxygen supplementation, while none of the cases in lower categories (0 and 1) utilized this support. Conclusion Lung ultrasound has been widely utilized as a diagnostic tool owing to its availability and simplicity of application. In the context of the pandemic emergency, a pressing need for a focused and easily applicable assessment arose. The structured reporting system, incorporating ultrasound findings for stratification, demonstrated ease of replicability. This system stands as a crucial tool for screening, predicting severity, and aiding in medical decisions, even in a non-pandemic context.

5.
Rev. CEFAC ; 26(3): e12523, 2024. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1559002

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Purpose: to determine the structure of treatment goals set by expert voice-specialized speech-language pathologists in treatment plans for patients with vocal needs. Methods: a cross-sectional documentary research was conducted to analyze 129 treatment goals proposed in treatment plans by 30 expert voice-specialized speech-language pathologists. These goals were thematically analyzed and organized according to the therapeutic content addressed. The goals including the notion of patient in their wording, the statement of a specific purpose, the method for achieving it, and the presence of outcome criteria, were evaluated. Results: most treatment goals analyzed correspond to those aimed at modifying vocal parameters (67.4%). The contents referring to muscle tone (13.8%), vocal hygiene and education (10%), breathing (7.75%), and posture (1.55%) are represented to a lesser extent. From the total number of treatment goals analyzed, 82.17% include the notion of patient, 88.37% indicate the method, 100% indicate the purpose, 52.71% state the outcome criteria used, and 17.05% include other components in their structure. Conclusions: diversity in goal setting shows different visions by the professionals involved in the therapeutic process.


RESUMEN Objetivo: determinar la estructura de los objetivos operacionales formulados por los/las fonoaudiólogos/as en las planificaciones terapéuticas para usuarios con necesidades vocales. Métodos: investigación documental transversal en que se analizaron 129 objetivos operacionales propuestos en las planificaciones terapéuticas de 30 fonoaudiólogos/as. Estos objetivos se sometieron a un proceso de análisis temático y se organizaron según el contenido terapéutico abordado. Se examinó la inclusión de la noción de usuario en la redacción, la declaración de una finalidad específica, el método para alcanzarla y la presencia de criterios de logro. Resultados: de la totalidad de objetivos analizados, la mayoría corresponde a aquellos que están orientados a la modificación de parámetros vocales (67.4%). En menor medida, están representados los contenidos referentes a tonicidad muscular (13.8%), educación e higiene vocal (10%), respiración (7.75%) y postura (1.55%). Del total, un 82.17% incluye la noción de usuario, un 88.37% señala el método, el 100% indica la finalidad y un 52.71% declara los criterios de logro utilizados. Un 17.05% incluye otros componentes en su estructura. Conclusiones: la diversidad en la formulación de los objetivos evidencia distintas visiones acerca del proceso terapéutico por parte de los profesionales involucrados.

6.
Rev. bras. enferm ; 77(1): e20220773, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1529825

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the initial nipple damage degree by breastfeeding practice and to associate findings with clinical manifestations of breastfeeding women. Methods: a retrospective, cross-sectional study with primary data and photographic images database from two randomized clinical trials. Photographic images were analyzed by two independent evaluators using the Nipple Trauma Score. For analysis, the chi-square, Mann-Whitney tests and Kappa coefficient were applied. Results: 115 breastfeeding women and their respective 186 photographic images were analyzed. The degree of agreement of evaluators using the Nipple Trauma Score was 93.6%. The nipple pain score during breastfeeding was moderate and compromised more than 25% of the nipple surface area. Conclusions: assistance to breastfeeding women should prioritize nipple pain intensity instead of the nipple damage size.


RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar el grado de afectación tisular en las lesiones tempranas del pezón resultantes de la lactancia materna y asociar los hallazgos con las manifestaciones clínicas de las mujeres que amamantan. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo, transversal, con datos primarios y banco de imágenes fotográficas de dos ensayos clínicos aleatorizados. Las imágenes fotográficas fueron analizadas por dos evaluadores independientes, utilizando el Nipple Trauma Score. Para el análisis se aplicaron las pruebas de Chi-Cuadrado, Mann-Whitney y coeficiente Kappa. Resultados: se analizaron 115 mujeres lactantes y sus respectivas 186 imágenes fotográficas. El grado de acuerdo de los evaluadores utilizando el Nipple Trauma Score fue del 93,6%. El nivel de dolor en el pezón durante la lactancia es moderado y existe presencia de lesiones del pezón con más del 25% de la superficie del pezón comprometida. Conclusiones: la asistencia a la mujer lactante debe priorizar el nivel de dolor que presenta en detrimento del tamaño de la lesión del pezón.


RESUMO Objetivo: analisar o grau de comprometimento tecidual das lesões mamilares precoces decorrentes da amamentação e associar achados com as manifestações clínicas de mulheres em amamentação. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo, transversal, envolvendo o uso de dados primários e de banco de imagens fotográficas provenientes de dois ensaios clínicos randomizados. Imagens fotográficas foram analisadas por duas avaliadoras independentes a partir do instrumento Nipple Trauma Score. Para análise, aplicou-se os testes Qui-Quadrado, Mann-Whitney e coeficiente Kappa. Resultados: foram analisadas 115 lactantes e respectivas 186 imagens fotográficas. O grau de concordância das avaliadoras pelo instrumento Nipple Trauma Score foi de 93,6%. O nível de dor mamilar encontrado durante as mamadas é moderado e há presença de lesões mamilares com mais de 25% de área da superfície do mamilo comprometida. Conclusões: a assistência a mulheres que amamentam deve priorizar o nível de dor apresentado em detrimento do tamanho da lesão mamilar.

7.
Artículo en Español | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1528856

RESUMEN

Uno de los principales problemas durante la dentición mixta es la determinación de la futura discrepancia entre tamaño dentario y el espacio disponible. Para predecir el ancho mesiodistal de los dientes permanentes no erupcionados se han introducido diferentes métodos de análisis. Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio fue comparar el método Tanaka-Johnston con una nueva ecuación de regresión para predecir el ancho mesiodistal de caninos y premolares permanentes no erupcionados en una población de la región de Valparaíso, Chile. Material y método: Este estudio fue realizado en la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Valparaíso, desde octubre de 2022 a junio de 2023 (8 meses), la muestra estuvo compuesta por 202 modelos de estudio del departamento de ortodoncia (91 hombres y 111 mujeres) en el rango de edad de 11 -20 años. Resultados: Se demostró que el método elaborado por Lara-Sandoval presenta mayor fiabilidad respecto a las medidas mesiodistales reales de los pacientes (ICC 0,773 para maxilar y 0,762 para mandíbula), en comparación con el método de Tanaka-Johnston (ICC 0,665 para maxilar y 0,623 para mandíbula). No existen diferencias significativas entre los valores reales y el método de Lara-Sandoval. Conclusión: El método de Lara-Sandoval es mejor que el propuesto por Tanaka-Johnston para determinar el ancho mesiodistal de caninos y premolares para esta muestra. Es necesario validar este método en otras regiones del país para ser utilizado con mayor seguridad que el ya existente como método estándar nacional.


One of the main orthodontic problems in mixed dentition is the determination of future tooth and size arch discrepancy. In order to predict the mesiodistal widths of unerupted permanent teeth different methods of analyses have been introduced. The aim of this study is to compare the Tanaka-Johnston analysis with a new regressive equation to predict the mesiodistal width of unerupted permanent canines and premolars in a Chilean population sample, from Valparaíso region. This study was conducted at the Universidad de Valparaíso Dental Faculty, from october 2022 to june 2023 (8 months), and the sample comprised historical dental casts from 202 patients (91 boys and 111 girls) in the age range of 11-20 from the orthodontics department. All the patients are from the Valparaíso region, Chile. The results show that the predictions of the new regressive equation method are closer to the actual mesiodistal measurements of the patients (ICC 0,773 for maxilla and 0,762 for mandible), compared to the Tanaka- Johnston method (ICC 0,665 for maxilla and 0,623 for mandible). There are no significant differences between the real values and the Lara-Sandoval method. Lara-Sandoval method is better than the one proposed by Tanaka-Johnston to determine the mesiodistal width of canines and premolars in this sample population. It is necessary to validate this method in other regions of the country to be used with greater security than the ones that already exists as a national standard method.

8.
Rev. latinoam. enferm. (Online) ; 31: e3974, ene.-dic. 2023. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1450108

RESUMEN

Objetivo: verificar la validez clínica de la proposición de un nuevo diagnóstico de enfermería denominado sed perioperatoria, basado en la precisión diagnóstica de sus indicadores clínicos, incluyendo la magnitud del efecto de sus factores etiológicos. Método: estudio de validación clínica diagnóstica con 150 pacientes quirúrgicos en un hospital universitario. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas e indicadores clínicos relacionados con la sed. Se utilizó la técnica de análisis de clases latentes. Resultados: se propusieron dos modelos de clases latentes para las características definitorias. El modelo ajustado en el preoperatorio incluía: labios resecos, saliva espesa, lengua espesa, ganas de beber agua, informe del cuidador, garganta seca y deglución constante de saliva. En el postoperatorio: sequedad de garganta, saliva espesa, lengua espesa, constante deglución de saliva, ganas de beber agua, mal gusto en la boca. Los factores relacionados "temperatura ambiente elevada" y "sequedad de boca" se asocian a la presencia de sed, así como las condiciones asociadas "uso de anticolinérgicos" e "intubación". La prevalencia de sed fue del 62,6% en el preoperatorio y del 50,2% en el postoperatorio inmediato. Conclusión: la proposición diagnóstica de la sed perioperatoria mostró buenos parámetros de precisión de sus indicadores clínicos y efectos etiológicos. Esta propuesta en una taxonomía de enfermería permitirá una mayor visibilidad, apreciación y tratamiento de este síntoma.


Objective: to verify the clinical validity of the proposition of a new nursing diagnosis called perioperative thirst, based on the diagnostic accuracy of its clinical indicators, including the magnitude of effect of its etiological factors. Method: clinical diagnostic validation study with a total of 150 surgical patients at a university hospital. Sociodemographic variables and clinical indicators related to thirst were collected. The latent class analysis technique was used. Results: two models of latent classes were proposed for the defining characteristics. The model adjusted preoperatively included: dry lips, thick saliva, thick tongue, desire to drink water, caregiver report, dry throat and constant swallowing of saliva. In the postoperative period: dry throat, thick saliva, thick tongue, constant swallowing of saliva, desire to drink water, bad taste in the mouth. The factors related to "high ambient temperature" and "dry mouth" are associated with the presence of thirst, as well as the associated conditions "use of anticholinergics" and "intubation". The prevalence of thirst was 62.6% in the pre and 50.2% in the immediate postoperative period. Conclusion: the diagnostic proposition of perioperative thirst showed good accuracy parameters for its clinical indicators and etiological effects. This proposition in a nursing taxonomy will allow greater visibility, appreciation and treatment of this symptom.


Objetivo: verificar a validade clínica da proposição de um novo diagnóstico de enfermagem denominado sede perioperatória, com base na acurácia diagnóstica de seus indicadores clínicos, incluindo a magnitude de efeito de seus fatores etiológicos. Método: estudo de validação clínica diagnóstica com 150 pacientes cirúrgicos em um hospital universitário. Foram coletadas variáveis sociodemográficas e indicadores clínicos relacionados à sede. Empregou-se a técnica de análise de classe latente. Resultados: dois modelos de classes latentes foram propostos para as características definidoras. O modelo ajustado no pré-operatório incluiu: lábios ressecados, saliva grossa, língua grossa, vontade de beber água, relato do cuidador, garganta seca e constante deglutição de saliva. No pós-operatório: garganta seca, saliva grossa, língua grossa, constante deglutição de saliva, vontade de beber água, gosto ruim na boca. Os fatores relacionados Temperatura do ambiente elevada e Boca seca estão associados à presença de sede, assim como as condições associadas Utilização de anticolinérgicos e Intubação. A prevalência de sede foi de 62,6% no pré-operatório e 50,2% no pós-operatório imediato. Conclusão: a proposição diagnóstica de sede perioperatória apresentou bons parâmetros de acurácia de seus indicadores clínicos e efeitos etiológicos. Essa proposição em uma taxonomia de enfermagem permitirá maior visibilidade, valorização e tratamento desse sintoma.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermería Perioperatoria , Sed , Diagnóstico de Enfermería , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas
9.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 2023 Sep; 8(3): 229-230
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-222716

RESUMEN

This article recounts a poignant interaction between the author and a mother of a child with cerebral palsy. The mother's remarkable strength and optimism in the face of adversity deeply moved the author, leading to a tearful moment which prompted a comforting response from the mother. The ongoing debate regarding whether doctors are allowed to display emotions in their professional lives centers around the challenge of balancing professionalism with the emotional impact of providing healthcare to patients. While doctors are expected to uphold professionalism and make sound decisions in their work environment, simultaneous expression of emotions, empathy, and vulnerabilities becomes inevitable.

10.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 43(Supl. 1)ago. 2023.
Artículo en Español | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1550064

RESUMEN

Introducción. La diabetes es una enfermedad crónica que se caracteriza por el aumento de la concentración de la glucosa en sangre. Puede generar complicaciones que afectan la calidad de vida y aumentan los costos de la atención en salud. En los últimos años, las tasas de prevalencia y mortalidad han aumentado en todo el mundo. El desarrollo de modelos con gran desempeño predictivo puede ayudar en la identificación temprana de la enfermedad. Objetivo. Desarrollar un modelo basado en la inteligencia artificial para apoyar la toma de decisiones clínicas en la detección temprana de la diabetes. Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio de corte transversal, utilizando un conjunto de datos que incluía edad, signos y síntomas de pacientes con diabetes y de individuos sanos. Se utilizaron técnicas de preprocesamiento para los datos. Posteriormente, se construyó el modelo basado en mapas cognitivos difusos. El rendimiento se evaluó mediante tres parámetros: exactitud, especificidad y sensibilidad. Resultados. El modelo desarrollado obtuvo un excelente desempeño predictivo, con una exactitud del 95 %. Además, permitió identificar el comportamiento de las variables involucradas usando iteraciones simuladas, lo que proporcionó información valiosa sobre la dinámica de los factores de riesgo asociados con la diabetes. Conclusiones. Los mapas cognitivos difusos demostraron ser de gran valor para la identificación temprana de la enfermedad y en la toma de decisiones clínicas. Los resultados sugieren el potencial de estos enfoques en aplicaciones clínicas relacionadas con la diabetes y respaldan su utilidad en la práctica médica para mejorar los resultados de los pacientes.


Introduction. Diabetes is a chronic disease characterized by a high blood glucose level. It can lead to complications that affect the quality of life and increase the costs of healthcare. In recent years, prevalence and mortality rates have increased worldwide. The development of models with high predictive performance can help in the early identification of the disease. Objective. To develope a model based on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in the early detection of diabetes. Materials and methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study, using a dataset that contained age, signs, and symptoms of patients with diabetes and of healthy individuals. Pre-processing techniques were applied to the data. Subsequently, we built the model based on fuzzy cognitive maps. Performance was evaluated with three metrics: accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Results. The developed model obtained an excellent predictive performance with an accuracy of 95%. In addition, it allowed to identify the behavior of the variables involved using simulated iterations, which provided valuable information about the dynamics of the risk factors associated with diabetes. Conclusions. Fuzzy cognitive maps demonstrated a high value for the early identification of the disease and in clinical decision-making. The results suggest the potential of these approaches in clinical applications related to diabetes and support their usefulness in medical practice to improve patient outcomes.

11.
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-220781

RESUMEN

Innovative computer techniques are now being utilized not only in academic research but also in commercial dental practice, revolutionizing various areas of dentistry. This digitalization trend is driven by the increasing demands for treatment and diagnosis in the eld. Accurate diagnosis is crucial in dentistry, whether it be in orthodontics, maxillofacial surgery, periodontics, or prosthetics, as it forms the basis for creating effective treatment plans and restoring patients' oral health. While a specialist's expertise plays a vital role in diagnosis and treatment planning, it is susceptible to the inherent risks of human error, given the multifactorial nature of dental conditions. Consequently, there is growing interest in leveraging multi-parametric pattern recognition methods, including statistics, machine learning, and articial intelligence (AI), to enhance clinical decision-making. The introduction of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and genetic algorithms (GAs) in dental research and clinical practice holds great promise for both healthcare professionals and patients. Extensive work has been undertaken to develop CDSS in dentistry, and this article reviews the latest advancements in this eld.

12.
Indian J Cancer ; 2023 Jun; 60(2): 211-216
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-221779

RESUMEN

Background: Various clinical applications have been attempted using artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support system (CDSS), and it has become a starting point for personalized cancer treatment. We aimed to identify the degree of agreement between the AI?CDSS, Watson for Oncology (WFO), and the clinician in treatment recommendations for Korean breast cancer patients and to provide guidelines for future improvement. Methods: One hundred and eighty?three breast cancer patients who underwent treatment at the Pusan National University Hospital between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2017 were enrolled in this study. The concordance between WFO抯 and clinicians� treatment recommendations were examined according to various factors. Results: WFO gave the same treatment option recommendations as clinicians in 74 (40.4%) of the cases. According to the logistic regression, the difference in recommendation concordance between stage I and stage III was statistically significant (P = 0.004), and there was no difference among other factors. Conclusion: The concordance of treatment recommendations was low overall. However, this is largely attributable to the differences of medical insurance system and healthcare environment between the United States and Korea. In the future, region?specific features should be considered or reflected during the development of AI?CDSS.

13.
Braz. dent. j ; 34(3): 82-93, May-June 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1447598

RESUMEN

Abstract The objective of this study was to observe patients' satisfaction with their in-service direct anterior dental restorations and to compare it with clinical evaluation using FDI (Federation Dental International) criteria. Patients scored their own anterior dental restorations regarding satisfaction (satisfactory /dissatisfactory). If dissatisfaction was mentioned, then, they would be interviewed about the complaint. In the same session, the dental restorations were clinically evaluated by two dentists using FDI criteria (1-5 score) concerning esthetic, functional, and biological domains. Descriptive statistics were used for frequencies of scores attributed by patients and clinicians. In order to compare patients' to clinicians' frequencies, the Chi-square test was applied (p ≤ 0.05). A total of 106 restorations were evaluated by patients and clinicians. Patients reported 52.8% of restorations satisfactory and 47.8% dissatisfactory. Overall, clinicians reported the same restorations as 82,3% satisfactory and 17,6% dissatisfactory. Patients' most frequent complaints referred to color, followed by anatomical form, fracture of material and retention, and approximal anatomical form. Comparing patients' satisfaction and dissatisfaction rates to clinicians' evaluation per criteria, there was no difference regarding esthetics. The frequency of dissatisfactory restorations by clinicians was significantly lower when functional and biological properties were compared with patients' opinions. Direct anterior dental restorations were more frequently reported as satisfactory by patients and clinicians, being the main complaints related to esthetic issues. When clinicians and patients' evaluations were compared, it was observed that the frequencies of satisfactory restoration by patients and clinicians were similar regarding esthetic properties, and significantly different regarding functional and biological properties.


Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi observar a satisfação dos pacientes com suas restaurações dentárias anteriores diretas e compará-las com a avaliação clínica do dentista usando os critérios FDI (Federation Dental International). Os pacientes pontuaram suas restaurações dentárias (n=106) anteriores em relação à satisfação (satisfatória / insatisfatória). Quando insatisfatória, ele foi entrevistado sobre a queixa. Na mesma sessão, as restaurações dentárias foram avaliadas clinicamente por dois dentistas utilizando os critérios FDI (escore 1-5) quanto aos aspectos estéticos, funcionais e biológicos. Estatística descritiva foi usada para frequências de escores atribuídos por pacientes e clínicos. Para comparar as frequências dos pacientes e dos clínicos, foi aplicado o teste Qui-quadrado (p ≤ 0,05). Os pacientes relataram suas restaurações como 52,8% satisfatórias e 47,8% insatisfatórias. Os clínicos reportaram as mesmas restaurações, 82,3% satisfatória e 17,6% insatisfatória. As queixas mais frequentes dos pacientes referiam-se à cor, seguida da forma anatômica, fratura e retenção do material e forma anatômica proximal. Comparando os índices de satisfação e insatisfação dos pacientes com os clínicos, não houve diferença em relação à estética. A frequência de restaurações insatisfatórias por dentistas foi significativamente menor quando as propriedades funcionais e biológicas foram comparadas com as opiniões dos pacientes. As restaurações foram mais frequentemente relatadas como satisfatórias pelos pacientes, sendo as principais queixas relacionadas a questões estéticas. Quando as avaliações dos clínicos e dos pacientes foram comparadas, observou-se que as frequências de restaurações satisfatórias por pacientes e clínicos foram semelhantes em relação às propriedades estéticas e significativamente diferentes em relação às propriedades funcionais e biológicas.

14.
Nursing (Ed. bras., Impr.) ; 26(300): 9616-9624, ju.2023. tab.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1443498

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Identificar práticas clínicas com resultados favoráveis aos pacientes com diagnóstico de infarto agudo do miocárdio sem obstrução de artéria coronária. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura pela base de dados National Library of Medicine e Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde de estudos publicados entre 2018 e 2022. Resultados:87,5% dos estudos encontrados destacaram estratégias farmacológicas e destes, 62,5% citaram o uso da dupla antiagregaçãoplaquetária como mais utilizada, apesar de nenhum estudo evidenciar benefícios. Os inibidores do sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona comprovaram benefícios em três estudos. 75% dos artigos apontaram que esse grupo de pacientes recebem menos medicamentos preventivos comparados aos pacientes com infarto por obstrução coronariana. Outros seis estudos, revelaram condução clínica variável desses pacientes. Conclusão: O uso de inibidores do sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona deve ser considerado por ser a única medicação com redução da mortalidade evidenciada. São necessários estudos maiores para orientar com mais segurança à condução do infarto do miocárdio sem obstrução de coronária.(AU)


Objective: To identify clinical practices with favorable results for patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction without coronary artery obstruction. Method: Integrative literature review using the National Library of Medicine and Virtual Health Library databases of studies published between 2018 and 2022. Results: 87.5% of the studies found highlighted pharmacological strategies and of these, 62.5% cited the use of dual antiplatelet therapy as the most used, despite no study showing benefits. Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have shown benefits in three studies. 75% of the articles pointed out that this group of patients receive less preventive medication compared to patients with infarction due to coronary obstruction. Another six studies revealed variable clinical management of these patients. Conclusion: The use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors should be considered as it is the only medication with proven reduction in mortality. Larger studies are needed to guide with more safety the management of myocardial infarction without coronary obstruction.(AU)


Objetivo: Identificar prácticas clínicas con resultados favorables para pacientes con diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio sin obstrucción arterial coronaria. Método: revisión integrativa de la literatura utilizando las bases de datos de la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina y la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud de estudios publicados entre 2018 y 2022. Resultados: el 87,5% de los estudios encontrados destacaron estrategias farmacológicas y de estos, el 62,5% citó el uso de la terapia antiplaquetaria dual como el más utilizados, a pesar de que ningún estudio muestra beneficios. Los inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona han mostrado beneficios en tres estudios. El 75% de los artículos señalaron que este grupo de pacientes recibe menos medicación preventiva en comparación con los pacientes con infarto por obstrucción coronaria. Otros seis estudios revelaron un manejo clínico variable de estos pacientes. Conclusión: Se debe considerar el uso de inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona, ya que es el único medicamento con reducción comprobada de la mortalidad. Son necesarios estudios más amplios que orienten con mayor seguridad el manejo del infarto de miocardio sin obstrucción coronaria.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Terapéutica , Conductas Terapéuticas Homeopáticas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , MINOCA , Infarto del Miocardio
15.
Curitiba; s.n; 20230424. 184 p. ilus, graf, tab.
Tesis en Portugués | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1551280

RESUMEN

Resumo: O objetivo desta pesquisa foi sumarizar as evidências de revisões sistemáticas sobre a efetividade das estratégias de ensino para o desenvolvimento do raciocínio clínico ou pensamento crítico em estudantes da graduação em Enfermagem. Trata-se de uma overview de revisões sistemáticas, guiada pelas recomendações do Cochrane Handbook. O protocolo de pesquisa foi registrado na plataforma Prospero sob o número 187785, sendo este estudo inédito. O uso do protocolo possibilita a replicação ou atualização dessa overview. A pergunta de pesquisa foi: Quais as evidências de efetividade oriundas de revisões sistemáticas sobre as estratégias de ensino, isoladas, comparadas ou associadas, para o desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico dos estudantes de graduação em Enfermagem, em qualquer ambiente de aprendizagem? A busca por revisões Cochrane e não Cochrane foi realizada em oito bases de dados e bibliotecas, e na literatura cinzenta. Não houve restrições de idioma e ano de publicação. Foi recuperado um total de 13.936 estudos, com 6.620 participantes. Dois revisores independentes aplicaram os critérios de inclusão e exclusão, fizeram a extração dos dados e a análise de qualidade das revisões. Foram incluídas 11 revisões, com 65 estudos primários. As sínteses foram descritivas e por metanálises. A análise do risco de viés das revisões sistemáticas foi realizada por meio do instrumento ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews); a qualidade metodológica foi avaliada pelo instrumento AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews); e a análise da força da evidência seguiu as recomendações do sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Quatorze estudos, com 1.350 participantes, forneceram evidências para metanálise. As evidências, ainda que classificadas como de certeza muito baixa, sugerem que a aprendizagem baseada em problemas e a simulação são estratégias de ensino que possibilitam o desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico em estudantes de graduação em enfermagem. Risco de viés, heterogeneidade elevada, número limitado de estudos, número de participantes reduzido contribuíram para o rebaixamento do nível de certeza das evidências. Recomenda-se que os docentes avaliem as características dos estudantes antes de optarem por uma ou outra estratégia de ensino, e ponderem o uso diversificado. São importantes a frequência e duração da aplicação das estratégias, uma vez que o desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico ocorre de forma processual e contínua. Recomenda-se aos pesquisadores que o relato seja aprimorado, incluindo informações relevantes, como dados estatísticos, características do estudante e do ambiente de ensino. O uso de ferramentas que orientem um relato de qualidade é indicado. No planejamento dos ensaios clínicos, é relevante prever e padronizar o tempo de exposição à estratégia de ensino e a quantidade de sessões; utilizar pelo menos duas escalas de mensuração do pensamento crítico e aplicá-las no mínimo antes e após a intervenção. Tais cuidados promovem robustez aos resultados. A contribuição social dessa tese inédita é a identificação de estratégias de ensino - aprendizagem baseada em problemas e simulação - eficazes para o desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico em estudantes de enfermagem, o que possibilita, consequentemente, aprimorar a qualificação dos futuros enfermeiros para a prática profissional segura e baseada em evidências.


Abstract: The aim of this study was to summarize evidence from systematic reviews on the effectiveness of teaching strategies for the development of clinical reasoning or critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students. This is an overview of systematic reviews guided by the Cochrane Handbook recommendations. The research protocol was registered on the Prospero platform under number 187785 and this study is unprecedented. The use of the protocol makes it possible to replicate or update this overview. The research question was: What is the evidence of effectiveness from systematic reviews on teaching strategies, isolated, compared or associated, for the development of critical thinking of undergraduate nursing students in any learning environment? The search for Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews was performed in eight databases and libraries, and in the gray literature. There were no language and year of publication restrictions. A total of 13,936 studies with 6,620 participants were retrieved. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria and performed data extraction and quality analysis of the reviews. Eleven reviews with 65 primary studies were included. The syntheses were descriptive and by meta-analyses. Analysis of the risk of bias of systematic reviews was performed using the ROBIS instrument (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews); methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 instrument (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews); and analysis of the strength of evidence followed the recommendations of the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Fourteen studies of 1,350 participants provided evidence for meta-analysis. Despite the very low certainty of the evidence, findings suggest that the teaching strategies of problem-based learning and simulation enable the development of critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students. Risk of bias, high heterogeneity, limited number of studies, and reduced number of participants contributed to lower the level of certainty of the evidence. It is recommended that professors assess students' characteristics before choosing one or another teaching strategy and consider diversified use. The frequency and duration of the application of strategies is important, since the development of critical thinking occurs in a procedural and continuous way. It is recommended that researchers improve the report, including relevant information such as statistical data and characteristics of students and the teaching environment. The use of tools that guide a quality report is indicated. When planning clinical trials, it is important to predict and standardize the time of exposure to the teaching strategy and the number of sessions; use at least two clinical reasoning measurement scales and apply them at least before and after the intervention. These precautions bring robustness to the results. The social contribution of this unpublished thesis is the identification of effective teaching strategies for the development of critical thinking in nursing students, problem-based learning and simulation, thereby making it possible to improve the qualification of future nurses for a safe and evidence-based professional practice.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Pensamiento , Cognición , Ejercicio de Simulación , Educación en Enfermería , Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia
16.
Bol. méd. Hosp. Infant. Méx ; 80(1): 53-56, Jan.-Feb. 2023. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429940

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: Vascular malformations (VaM) are a heterogeneous group of disorders resulting from the dysmorphogenesis of blood vessels. Although correct classification is relevant to providing adequate treatment according to evidence-based medicine, diagnostic terminology may be misused or need clarification. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to measure agreement and concordance between referral and final confirmed diagnoses of 435 pediatric patients with VaM newly referred to the multidisciplinary Vascular Anomalies Clinic (VAC) using Fleiss kappa (κ) concordance analysis. Results: We found fair concordance between referral and confirmed diagnoses of VaM (κ 0.306, p < 0.001). Lymphatic malformations (LM) and VaM associated with other anomalies showed moderate diagnostic concordance (κ 0.593, p < 0.001 and κ 0.469, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Continuing medical education strategies are required to improve physician knowledge and diagnostic accuracy in patients with VaM.


Resumen Introducción: Las malformaciones vasculares (MVa) son un grupo heterogéneo de trastornos resultantes de la dismorfogénesis de los vasos sanguíneos. A pesar de que la correcta clasificación es relevante para brindar un adecuado tratamiento de acuerdo con la medicina basada en la evidencia, la terminología diagnóstica podría resultar confusa o utilizarse de manera inapropiada. Métodos: En este estudio retrospectivo se midieron el acuerdo y la concordancia entre los diagnósticos de referencia (o derivación) y los diagnósticos finales confirmados de 435 pacientes pediátricos con MVa recién remitidos a la Clínica de anomalías vasculares (CAV) multidisciplinaria, mediante el análisis de concordancia kappa de Fleiss (κ). Resultados: Se encontró una buena concordancia entre los diagnósticos de referencia (o derivación) y los diagnósticos confirmados de MVa (κ 0.306, p < 0.001). Las malformaciones linfáticas (LM) y las MVa asociadas con otras anomalías presentaron concordancias diagnósticas moderadas (κ 0.593, p < 0.001 y κ 0.469, p < 0.001, respectivamente). Conclusiones: Se requiere de estrategias de educación médica continua para mejorar el conocimiento de los médicos y la precisión diagnóstica de los pacientes con MVa.

17.
Gac. méd. Méx ; 159(1): 3-9, ene.-feb. 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1448258

RESUMEN

Resumen Introducción: La prueba genómica de recurrencia de 21 genes (PGR21) permite determinar la utilidad de la quimioterapia adyuvante en pacientes con cáncer de mama temprano luminal (CMTL). Se han desarrollado modelos predictivos adicionales, como las ecuaciones de Magee (EM), el modelo Predict (MP) y la puntuación del nomograma de la Universidad de Tennessee (NT). Objetivo: Evaluar la concordancia entre PGR21, EM, MP y NT. Métodos: Se incluyeron pacientes con CMTL unifocal y con resultados de PGR21, EM, MP y NT. Se efectuó subanálisis de mujeres mayores de 50 años. La concordancia se evaluó mediante índice kappa de Cohen (IK). Resultados: Se incluyeron 122 mujeres. La concordancia entre PGR21 y EM (IK = 0.35) y MP (IK = 0.24) fue aceptable (p < 0.001); entre PGR21 y NT fue inferior (IK = 0.16, p = 0.04). Se incluyeron 80 pacientes mayores de 50 años con datos suficientes para calcular los tres modelos. Se encontró concordancia entre la clasificación de bajo riesgo mediante PGR21 y los tres modelos combinados en 36/37 pacientes (valor predictivo negativo de 97.3 %). Conclusión: Se puede omitir la PGR21 en las mujeres mayores de 50 años con CMTL que se clasifica de bajo riesgo en los tres modelos predictivos.


Abstract Introduction: The genomic-based 21-gene recurrence score assay (21-GRSA) allows to determine the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with luminal-type early breast cancer (LTEBC). Additional predictive models have also been developed, such as Magee equations (ME), the Predict model (PM), and the Tennessee nomogram score (TNS). Objective: To evaluate the concordance between 21-GRSA, ME, PM and TNS. Methods: Patients with unifocal LTEBC and 21-GRSA, ME, PM and TNS results were included. A subgroup analysis of women older than 50 years was carried out. Concordance between the models and 21-GRSA was evaluated using Cohen's kappa index (KI). Results: One-hundred and twenty-two women were included. Concordance between 21-GRSA and ME (KI = 0.35) and PM (KI = 0.24) was fair (p < 0.001). Concordance between 21-GRSA and TNS was inferior (KI = 0.16, p = 0.04). Eighty patients older than 50 years with sufficient data to calculate all three predictive models were included. Concordance was found between the low-risk classification on 21-GRSA and all three combined models in 36/37 patients (negative predictive value of 97.3%). Conclusion: 21-GRSA can be omitted in women older than 50 years with LTEBC classified with low risk scores on all three predictive models.

18.
MedUNAB ; 26(2): 251-261, 20230108.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1555173

RESUMEN

Introducción. Tomar decisiones clínicas basadas en la mejor evidencia disponible es una buena práctica que favorece los resultados en salud. Su uso ha sido promovido por diferentes organismos; sin embargo, aún existen algunas barreras entre profesionales de la salud para su apropiación. El objetivo fue el análisis exploratorio del efecto de un curso sobre los conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes frente a la Medicina Basada en la Evidencia (MBE) en profesionales de la salud que ejercen en Bogotá, Colombia. Metodología. Estudio exploratorio que incluyó un componente cuantitativo y uno cualitativo de carácter descriptivo. El estudio se desarrolló entre agosto de 2022 y abril de 2023. Para el componente cuantitativo se construyó un cuestionario tipo test, compuesto por 38 preguntas, aplicado antes y después del curso. Respecto de lo cualitativo, se realizaron en total 6 entrevistas semiestructuradas a docentes, estudiantes y uno de los gestores del proyecto. Resultados. Los resultados cuantitativos permitieron identificar cambios relacionados con la toma de decisiones clínicas, una mejora en el conocimiento y aplicación de herramientas para la evaluación de la calidad de estudios para resolver preguntas clínicas. El componente cualitativo permitió identificar dos temáticas centrales: pedagogía de la toma de decisiones y los aspectos que posibilitan o no la implementación de estas herramientas para tomar decisiones clínicas. Discusión. Los resultados sobre los efectos del curso son similares a los reportados por otros estudios en contextos diferentes al colombiano. Se requiere investigación que a mediano y largo plazo mida el impacto de la formación en el cambio de práctica. Conclusión. El curso sugiere tener efectos en los conocimientos y habilidades para mejorar la búsqueda y evaluación de la evidencia, así como para la formulación de preguntas clínicas, la comprensión de la certeza de la evidencia y mejorar la actitud hacia el uso de la evidencia para fundamentar la toma de decisiones en la clínica. Palabras clave: Medicina Basada en la Evidencia; Capacitación Profesional; Toma de Decisiones Clínicas; Desarrollo de Personal; Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud.


Introduction. Making clinical decisions based on the best available evidence is a good practice that favors health outcomes. Different organizations have promoted its use; however, there are still some barriers to its appropriation among health professionals. The objective was the exploratory analysis of the effect of a course on knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in health professionals practicing in Bogotá, Colombia. Methodology. Exploratory study that included quantitative and qualitative components with a descriptive approach. The study was conducted between August 2022 and April 2023. For the quantitative component, a questionnaire was developed with 38 questions, applied before and after the course. In the qualitative component, 6 semi-structured interviews were conducted with teachers, students, and a Project manager. Results. The quantitative results showed changes in clinical decision-making and the improvement in the knowledge and application of study quality assessment tools to resolve clinical issues. The qualitative component identified two main themes: pedagogy in decision-making and the aspects that either allow or do not allow the implementation of these tools for clinical decision-making. Discussion. The results on the effects of the course are similar to those reported by other studies in contexts other than Colombia. Research is needed in the medium and long term to measure the impact of the training on practice change. Conclusion. The course suggests effects on knowledge and skills related to searching for and evaluating evidence, formulating clinical questions, understanding the certainty of evidence, and improving attitudes toward the use of evidence to inform clinical decision-making. Keywords: Evidence-Based Medicine; Professional Training; Clinical Decision-Making; Staff Development; Outcome Assessment Health Care


Introdução. Tomar decisões clínicas baseadas nas melhores evidências disponíveis é uma boa prática que favorece os resultados em saúde. A sua utilização tem sido promovida por diferentes instâncias, contudo, ainda existem algumas barreiras entre os profissionais de saúde para a sua apropriação. O objetivo foi a análise exploratória do efeito de um curso sobre conhecimentos, habilidades e atitudes em relação à Medicina Baseada em Evidências (MBE) em profissionais de saúde que atuam em Bogotá, Colômbia. Metodologia. Estudo exploratório que incluiu uma componente quantitativa e uma componente qualitativa descritiva. O estudo foi realizado entre agosto de 2022 e abril de 2023. Para a componente quantitativa foi criado um questionário do tipo teste, composto por 38 questões, aplicado antes e após o curso. Quanto aos aspectos qualitativos, foram realizadas um total de 6 entrevistas semiestruturadas com professores, alunos e um dos gestores do projeto. Resultados. Os resultados quantitativos permitiram identificar mudanças relacionadas à tomada de decisão clínica, melhoria no conhecimento e aplicação de ferramentas de avaliação da qualidade dos estudos para resolução de questões clínicas. A componente qualitativa permitiu identificar dois temas centrais: a pedagogía da tomada de decisão e os aspectos que possibilitam ou não a implementação destas ferramentas para a tomada de decisões clínicas. Discussão. Os resultados sobre os efeitos do curso são semelhantes aos relatados por otros estudos noutros contextos que não a Colômbia. É necessária investigação a médio e longo prazo para medir o impacto da formação na mudança de práticas. Conclusão. O curso sugere ter efeitos sobre conhecimentos e competências para melhorar a procura e avaliação de evidências, bem como para formular questões clínicas, compreender a certeza das evidências e melhorar a atitude em relação ao uso de evidências para fundamentar a tomada de decisões na clínica. Palavras-chave: Medicina Baseada em Evidências; Capacitação Profissional; Tomada de Decisão Clínica; Desenvolvimento de Pessoal; Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Desarrollo de Personal , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Capacitación Profesional , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas
20.
West China Journal of Stomatology ; (6): 134-139, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981104

RESUMEN

When selecting implant guidance methods or judging whether the patient can be implanted, many doctors ignore or only use visual inspection to estimate a patient's mouth opening. This phenomenon often leads to failure to complete the implantation due to insufficient mouth opening or the deflection of the implant due to limited angle, resulting in the high incidence of corresponding complications. The main reason is that doctors lack accurate analysis and control of the overall geometric conditions of the intraoral surgical area, and three-dimensional position blocking of surgical instruments occurs during the operation. In the past, mouth opening was defined as the distance between the incisor edges of the upper and lower central incisors when the patient opens his mouth widely, and the implant area could be in any missing tooth position. When it is in the posterior tooth area, the specific measurement scheme of the mouth opening could not be simply equivalent to the previous measurement method in the anterior tooth area. However, how to measure quickly and conveniently the mouth opening of any surgical area to determine whether it could be implanted and meet the needs of the selected guidance method remains unclear. This paper introduces new concepts, establishes new classification and corresponding accurate measurement scheme of implant area, and establishes a decision tree of implant methods guided by the actually measured value. Results provide a quantitative basis for rational formulation and implementation of implant treatment.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Boca , Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Incisivo , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Implantes Dentales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA