Study on research cooperation based on published scientific papers from hospital / 中华医学科研管理杂志

Objective The internationalization of modern scientific research and its high degree of complexity have showed the importance of scientific research cooperation.How to promote cooperation more effectively is an important research topic.Methods This article analyzes the research cooperation of Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences during the past 12 years.Results Scientific research cooperation is a big trigger for the output of papers,especially high-level output,international and native institutions' cross-cooperation can be used as an important way for expanding scientific research cooperation and provides a reference for decision-making.Conclusions Strengthen the awareness of cooperation,increasing scientific research funding,establishing common and hot research directions and constructing highlevel platform can expand scientific research cooperation.

Co-Author Networks in Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to analyze the co-author networks in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, a representative journal published by a branch of the domestic psychiatric academy, in order to present the current state of the co-authoring of and developments in child and adolescent psychiatry. METHODS: We visualized and estimated the basic characteristics of the co-author networks shown by 564 authors who wrote 251 papers published in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry between 2005 and 2015, in order to assess their network characteristics, author centrality, and relevance to research performance. RESULTS: The co-author networks in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry showed the characteristics of a small world and scale-free network. There was a correlation between the author centrality within the network and the research performance of the authors, but less correlation was shown between the centrality and mean paper citation counts. CONCLUSION: The network structure in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry showed similarity to the co-authoring of other branches. However, given that the mean paper citation counts were less correlated with the author centrality than those in other branches, it may be necessary to promote an increase in the mean paper citation counts.

Allocation methods of coauthor credit in collaboration of scientific research / 中华医学图书情报杂志

The rationality of hormonal calculating method for the precedence of signed authors and the total num-ber of coauthors was elaborated according to the analysis of different allocation methods for the credit weight of coau-thors. It was proposed that the credit weight calculating method of co-first authors, corresponding author and co-corresponding authors should be used as a supplement of hormonal calculating method, and the published papers and their citation frequency should be weighted in order to provide the ideas for revising the present scientific re-search evaluation methods.

Electronic Medical Record in TCM Field-An Analysis Based on Scientific Knowledge Visualization / 中国中医药信息杂志

ObjectiveTo assess China’s newly evolved hot spots and novelty of structural electronic medical record in TCM field.Methods Articles about electronic medical record in TCM field were retrieved from CNKI from January 2000 to December 2015, focusing on researchers, research institutes, and key words for bibliometric analysis. Then visualization software CiteSpace was used to establish co-occurrence network.ResultsThe top 3 productive authors were LIU Bao-yan (13 articles), ZHANG Run-shun (8 articles), XIE Qi (7 articles), and ZHOU Xue-zhong (7 articles). Institutes highly cooperated with others included China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Information Engineering College of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine and The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine. The major clusters were TCM diagnosis (#0), China’s TCM information (#1), artificial intelligence (#2), medical record management (#3), and medical laboratory department (#4). The representative keywords involved electronic medical record, TCM hospital, data mining, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence. ConclusionIn the field of TCM electronic medical record, cooperation is not sufficiently facilitated among researchers and institutes. Research hot spots are not formed and novelty is not obvious, which is probably because of the overall status quo for China’s TCM information construction.

Authorship of scientific articles within an ethical-legal framework:quantitative model / Autoría en artículos científicos dentro de un marco ético legal: modelo cuantitativo

En la ciencia moderna,interdisciplinaria e interinstitucional, definir quién es autor y el ordende autoría en artículos científicos se ha convertido en problema anivel ético y legal. No aclarar la autoría antes o durante la realizaciónde la investigación genera problemas entre los que se consideranautores. Este artículo propone un formato cuantitativo y cualitativopara determinar autorías dentro del marco científico, ético y legal.Los principios utilizados para la construcción de este formato sefundamentaron en 2 criterios: a) fases de investigación y métodocientífico; involucrando: 1. planificación y elaboración del proyectode investigación, 2. diseño y obtención de datos, 3. presentaciónde resultados, 4. interpretación de resultados, 5. preparación delmanuscrito para la difusión del nuevo conocimiento, y 6. administracióny gestión; y b) coeficientes de ponderación en cada fase, para tomardecisiones de autoría y titularidad de obra. De la misma manera elformato considera y diferencia que fase y actividad, realizada dentro dela creación de la obra y difusión del conocimiento, es aporte práctico ointelectual; lo cual contrasta y complementa lo que la ley de derechosde autor protege. El formato es aplicable apriori y a posteriori a larealización de un proyecto o manuscrito y adaptable a cualquier tipode investigación y publicación, resolviendo cuantitativamente: 1.Orden de autores (primer autor y orden de coautores), 2. Inclusión yexclusión de colaboradores considerando principios éticos y legales y3. Porcentajes de derecho patrimonial para cada autor...

Determining authorship and the order of authorship inscientific papers, in modern interdisciplinary and interinstitutionalscience, has become complex at a legal and ethical level. Failureto define authorship before or during the research, createssubsequent problems for those considered authors of a publicationor lead authors of a work, particularly so, once the project ormanuscript is completed. This article proposes a quantitativeand qualitative model to determine authorship within a scientific,ethical and legal frame. The principles used for the constructionof this design are based on 2 criteria: a) stages of research andscientific method involving: 1. Planning and development of theresearch project, 2. Design and data collection, 3. Presentationof results, 4. Interpretation of results, 5. Manuscript preparationto disseminate new knowledge to the scientific community, 6.Administration and management, and b) weighting coefficients ineach phase, to decide on authorship and ownership of the work.The model also considers and distinguishes whether the leveland activity performed during the creation of the work and thediffusion of knowledge is an intellectual or practical contribution;this distinction both contrasts and complements the elementsprotected by copyright laws. The format can be applied a prioriand a posteriori to the completion of a project or manuscript andcan conform to any research and publication type. The use ofthis format will quantitatively resolve: 1. The order of authorship(first author and co-author order), 2. Determine the inclusion andexclusion of contributors, taking into account ethical and legalprinciples, and 3. Percentages of economic rights for each authors...

Na ciência moderna, interdisciplinar e inter-institucional,a definição do que é um autor e da ordem de autoría em trabalhoscientíficos tornou-se um problema de ética e legal. A carência de definirautoría, antes ou durante a realização de pesquisas, gera problemasentre os autores considerados. Este artigo propõe um formatoquantitativo e qualitativo para determinar a autoría dentro de umaestrutura científica, ética e legal. Os princípios utilizados na construçãodeste formato basearam-se em dois critérios: a) as fases do método depesquisa científica, envolvendo: 1. planejamento e escrito da pesquisa,2. delineamento e coleta de dados, 3. apresentação dos resultados,4. interpretação dos resultados, 5. preparação do manuscrito para adivulgação de novos conhecimentos, e 6. administração e gestão, e, b)as fases ponderadas, para tomar decisões de autoría e de propriedadeda obra. O formato considera e inclui a diferença entre fase e atividade,realizadas dentro da criação da obra e disseminação do conhecimento,a contribuição intelectual ou prática, que contrasta e complementa oque a lei protege em direitos de autor. O formato se aplica apriori ea posteriori à conclusão de um projeto ou manuscrito e é adaptável aqualquer tipo de pesquisa e publicação, resolvendo quantitativamente:1. a ordem de autores (primeiro autor e co-autores), 2. inclusão eexclusão de contribuintes, considerando os princípios éticos e legais, e3. os percentuais de direitos econômicos para cada autor...