RESUMEN
The legal dilemma of informed consent facing in our country does not mean that the Chinese tradi-tional culture and the western human rights thought exist incommensurable. The solution to the informed consent di-lemma still needs take Chinese traditional"ritual" and"law" culture as basis, achieve the integration of ritual and law, eliminate their adverse effects, build the better Chinese medical ethics culture and medical legal culture, and promote the medical ethics, patient' s ethics and construction of legal system return to rational, so as to guarantee the effective realization of the double normative effect of law and ethics of the right and obligation of informed con-sent.
RESUMEN
El objetivo de este artículo es cuestionar algunas de las modas intelectuales en la psicología, y mostrar una posibilidad de análisis de las mismas a partir de concebir las teorías como dialectos (Ramírez, 2011a). Para ello, en un primer momento se plantea que es posible identificar diferentes registros, tipos y niveles de realidad. En un segundo momento se define teoría y se propone cuál sería su relación con la realidad. En un tercer momento, con base en el desarrollo anterior, se plantea que las teorías son como dialectos y que, como tales, varias de ellas pueden ser "habladas" por una misma persona. Finalmente, se plantea que la hipótesis anterior contribuye a un análisis no dogmático, lo cual evita, en parte, la adhesión acrítica a modas intelectuales de la psicología.
The aim of this article is to question some of the intellectual fashions in psychology, and show a possibility of analyzing them from conceiving theories as dialects (Ramírez, 2011a). Initially, different records, types and levels of reality are posed. In a second stage, theory is defined and its relation with reality is determined. In a third stage, based on the previous development, it is proposed that theories are like dialects and, as such many of them can be "spoken" by the same person. Finally, it is considered that the hypothesis above mentioned contributes to a non-dogmatic analysis, which prevents, in part, uncritical adherence to intellectual fashions of psychology.